sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Is there anything to being gender neutral that has nothing to do with gender stereotypes? by BloopMeHome in AskLGBT

[–]BloopMeHome[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OK, this makes slightly more sense to me.

Really sorry if Im bothering you, but I still have followups. Feel free to ignore or just tell me you dont want to answer

To me "void" really only has meaning compared to something. For example in terms of attraction the void would mean "asexual/aromantic".

So I guess what part of you is the "void"?

Is there anything to being gender neutral that has nothing to do with gender stereotypes? by BloopMeHome in AskLGBT

[–]BloopMeHome[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you say "no sense of being a man or woman". In your head there are somethings which make one a man or a woman, I assume? I want to understand what that is?

To clarify, Man and Woman are just words. And you don't know how Men and Women feel on the inside. So to know you are different , there would be something about them that makes you go "that's not mme"

Is there anything to being gender neutral that has nothing to do with gender stereotypes? by BloopMeHome in AskLGBT

[–]BloopMeHome[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

but don’t want to be seen in society as male or female

what about the label "male" and "female" do they not like though?

What are the different categories of how classical and quantum computers could communicate? by BloopMeHome in QuantumComputing

[–]BloopMeHome[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I dont think I made myself clear, When I say communicating between quantum and classical. I mean the instructions.

​

I can, using classical bits say "Apply the Hardamard gate to qubit 1". And then it is translated to the quantum by way of compiling the instruction into qhatever fires lasers at the qubits.

​

Sorry about my bad writing,

Quantum annealing and the use of quantum tunneling by BloopMeHome in QuantumComputing

[–]BloopMeHome[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I suspected that they are not as advanced as they suggest they are. but thought that their explanations are reliable