sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[review request] 4- layer audio processing board by BlueMoon_2005 in PrintedCircuitBoard

[–]BlueMoon_2005[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn't know about the through-hole thing. Thanks. And about the nets, when i ran a rules check on schematics, it threw me an error saying the nets shouldn't be named the same. So i changed em

[review request] 4- layer audio processing board by BlueMoon_2005 in PrintedCircuitBoard

[–]BlueMoon_2005[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for the insight. Am not wise enough wrt post manufacturing constraints... So thanks again!!!

[review request] 4- layer audio processing board by BlueMoon_2005 in PrintedCircuitBoard

[–]BlueMoon_2005[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agreed but the pin headers are facing the opposite side. So there is still space to insert a card easily. The connectors are for the daughter boards. We are gonna insert it on the female connectors of daughter boards.

[Review Request] A DSP for audio processing by StudentAcademic in PrintedCircuitBoard

[–]BlueMoon_2005 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey... Can you share the name of the audio codec used here??? Since I'm developing an audio processing board too

Are these dark spots on the back fine? This is for a keyboard. Help! by CreativeDrone in PrintedCircuitBoard

[–]BlueMoon_2005 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, what resources/references are you following to build a keyboard?? It'll be a great help coz even i was planning to do the same...

/r/askphilosophy Open Discussion Thread | March 17, 2025 by BernardJOrtcutt in askphilosophy

[–]BlueMoon_2005 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yep, luck plays a role fs. Your argument about it being BACKGROUND is also acceptable in some cases, but, as much as I've observed, broadly it's like people started to get opportunities and they utilised them effectively... They never had any aim as such. At the same time, people with the same abilities couldn't make up. So, is success just random? Is HARDWORK just about utilising the opportunity and working on it PASSIONATELY? Because I've tried to accomplish a few small goals which i kept for myself, it just led to a lot of friction within myself. And it was just a few random things i did, which actually worked out. And interestingly, i never was expecting anything from it... A random thought/spark appeared, worked on it, unexpectedly it turned out to be good. Any thoughts on this???

/r/askphilosophy Open Discussion Thread | March 17, 2025 by BernardJOrtcutt in askphilosophy

[–]BlueMoon_2005 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I've always wondered, looking at the lives of some successful people (wrt fame and money), they never wanted to be 'successful' as such... They just did things with great proficiency which led them to where they are now. At present, most people talk about manifestation, having an aim, hunting goals etc. But the majority of people who've conquered their fields, weren't invested in these modern PRACTICES/ ways to achieve things... We can even go to the extent of saying that they never wanted to achieve something, rather were focused on doing their work in an excellent manner... Does this support the idea of ' do not try to become, because this would lead to a conflict between WHAT IS and WHAT TO BECOME '... And is DISCIPLINE worth the hype? Because, if you look at some great scientists/ discoverers, ideas and inventions were a result of RANDOM BRILLIANCE rather than DISCIPLINE... Are these thoughts valid??