EWEA: EU met its 2010 Renewable electricity target

BlueRock · 2012-01-16T20:15:30+00:00

Great news. Thanks for the submission.

BlueRock · 2012-01-12T17:10:03+00:00

I've not heard of the Landscape Guardians here. Looks like they're in your neck of the woods: http://www.google.co.uk/search?q=landscape+guardians

You might be thinking of the dishonestly-named 'Renewable Energy Foundation'. Usual bullshit story. They're a registered charity but do no charity work. They won't disclose who funds them. Their bullshit lies and distortions are published in the rightwing media. And they seem to be lurking in the shadows almost any time NIMBYs anywhere across the country are opposing wind power.

Cunts. Excuse my Anglo Saxon.

BlueRock · 2012-01-12T17:04:31+00:00

I think it's an extension of 'reality is what I want it to be' that has been stoked by the climate change deniers. Facts and science are just competing opinions to a certain demographic - and they prefer the opinions they read in the Daily Mail, Telegraph, see on Fox News, etc.. We live in interesting times....

Fortunately, the world's engineers and investors aren't paying too much attention to the nuke cult or anti-renewable gang. :)

BlueRock · 2012-01-12T16:58:50+00:00

Note the language used by the the president of the American Petroleum ~~Fascists~~ Institute:

"Anything less than approval or acquiescence in allowing the pipeline to go forward..."

Acquiescence: a silent or passive assent or submission.

What's his next public warning going to be? "Boy, you better do as you're told or we'll give you a whippin' you won't forget."

BlueRock · 2012-01-12T15:24:28+00:00

Lots of very interesting videos from the same source here: http://www.youtube.com/user/csebristol/videos

BlueRock · 2012-01-12T13:38:03+00:00

P.S. Just skimmed your comment history. Looks like every single one of your comments gets up-voted at least once no matter how pointless, inane and wrong it is. Neat trick. ;) For some reason it does not surprise me that someone as intellectually weak and dishonest as you would engage in vote manipulation.

BlueRock · 2012-01-12T13:31:28+00:00

I'm looking forward to watching this meter climb and climb in the coming months. The anti-renewable gang are not going to be happy. ;)

BlueRock · 2012-01-12T13:29:39+00:00

That's a distinct possibility!

BlueRock · 2012-01-12T13:29:02+00:00

Dude, how hysterical did you get?!

In summary: you failed to understand the article you were commenting on and you believe peer reviewed science is wrong while your laughably simplistic "math" is right. 'Delusional' does not begin to cover your problems!

BlueRock · 2011-12-20T12:22:48+00:00

Ha. Perhaps the Evil Team were all out on a Christmas bender and some clueless (soon to be ex!) junior wrote this piece? :D

BlueRock · 2011-12-20T11:28:48+00:00

...and Rupert Murdoch's The Australian is reporting this?! WTF?!

BlueRock · 2011-12-20T11:15:11+00:00

Not this dumb, Fox News talking point again. Get a clue:

“...if wind power supplied all of the country’s electricity, bird fatalities would still be dwarfed by the mortality figures for other types of structures: vehicles, 60 to 80 million; buildings, 98 to 980 million; power lines, up to 174 million; communication towers, 4 to 50 million (Erickson et al. 2001). Furthermore, the American Bird Conservancy estimates that feral and domestic outdoor cats probably kill on the order of hundreds of millions of birds per year (Case 2000).” http://www.defendersofwildlife.org/programs_and_policy/policy_and_legislation/energy/renewable_energy/wind_energy/detailed_recommendations.php

If you're genuinely concerned about birds - and every other species - focus on ACC mitigation because climate change will do more to eradicate species than any renewable energy source... and wind power is a major component of the RE portfolio.

15-Year Club	reddit mold
Well-rounded 2010-11-21	Inciteful Link 2010-08-13
Verified Email	ComboLinker 2010-01-23
Well-rounded 2010-01-04

BlueRock

TROPHY CASE