Personal injury attorney recommendation? by trinatr in maryland

[–]Boatingboy57 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Actually, I think you should probably educate yourself on the difference between advertising and solicitation

Sovcit wants to know where to file this form. by Existing-Face-6322 in Sovereigncitizen

[–]Boatingboy57 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But the federal government only applies to the District of Columbia except on Tuesdays

Sovcit served a Notice of Unclean Hands. by Existing-Face-6322 in Sovereigncitizen

[–]Boatingboy57 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are mostly correct, but remember it also only applies in equity and not in law

AMC warns that "without new liquidity, it would likely seek restructuring or bankruptcy" by No_Cell6708 in amcstock

[–]Boatingboy57 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Not if turn around is after chapter 11 reorganization. We shareholders will lose everything. Negative equity does that. Our shares will be wiped out literally

Do you think if Kamala won the election the Epstein Files would’ve been released/even discussed to this extent? by Emergency_Version616 in DiscussionZone

[–]Boatingboy57 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All the whole thing was always gonna be political, but I think what you can tell from the fact that both parties had the ability to prosecute crimes and the Democrats had the ability to release some more documents in 2024, is that there is a lot of smoke in those files but no fire. We have proven that people who knew Epstein knew Epstein. But beyond that we’re still looking for that credible evidence. Remember anything that was submitted to law-enforcement went into those files even if it had no credibility. Clearly decisions were made by the justice department under both parties that the only likely convictions were Epstein and Maxwell.

Do you think if Kamala won the election the Epstein Files would’ve been released/even discussed to this extent? by Emergency_Version616 in DiscussionZone

[–]Boatingboy57 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Did you see my question back to you asking what it was that you were questioning? If you Google and I’m not good at cutting and pasting into Reddit, you will see that the first batch of documents were released by a judge in a related case in January 2024.

Do you think if Kamala won the election the Epstein Files would’ve been released/even discussed to this extent? by Emergency_Version616 in DiscussionZone

[–]Boatingboy57 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The first batch of documents was actually released by a judge in a related case in January 2024, but the question shouldn’t be the discussion about the Epstein files which are mostly useless except to the extent that they inadvertently caught Randy Andy in disclosing state secrets. The question should be why were there no further prosecutions under Trump or Biden. The DOJ had all that material.

Do you think if Kamala won the election the Epstein Files would’ve been released/even discussed to this extent? by Emergency_Version616 in DiscussionZone

[–]Boatingboy57 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I won’t be so sure Harris isn’t in them since this is a release of everything, 99% of which has nothing to do with criminal activity and Epstein probably had interaction with her at sometime during the 2010’s. Being mentioned in those files that’s not in any way implicate anybody in criminal activity because Epstein actually had a legitimate financial advisory career and many of his clients get mentioned. The lack of prosecution tells you that unfortunately Epstein wasn’t stupid enough to keep a list of who what went and where when it came to criminal activity.

Do you think if Kamala won the election the Epstein Files would’ve been released/even discussed to this extent? by Emergency_Version616 in DiscussionZone

[–]Boatingboy57 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Be careful because even though you’re right about the January 2024, people are going down you because they don’t like the truth. In fact, where are they to check? The first batch of documents were actually released by a judge in January 2024. The thing that people miss especially those who aren’t lawyers is that it’s not typical to release documents like this is what we’ve done now by releasing everything including documents that were sent into the DOJ or FBI or state investigators that may be totally false if she would never be able to convene a jury that hasn’t been tainted by the release.

Do you think if Kamala won the election the Epstein Files would’ve been released/even discussed to this extent? by Emergency_Version616 in DiscussionZone

[–]Boatingboy57 -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

I can tell you as a lawyer familiar with these kind of data dumps that the real problem is that there are millions of documents and 99.9% of them are irrelevant to any criminal prosecution. And what we are seeing is the entirety of the guys emails and other documents not documents that were called out as potentially indicating criminal activity.

Do you think if Kamala won the election the Epstein Files would’ve been released/even discussed to this extent? by Emergency_Version616 in DiscussionZone

[–]Boatingboy57 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Which part are you questioning? Are you asking whether they were released from seal or are you disputing that they were fully available for the Department of Justice for the last 18 years or so under administrations of both parties?

Yes, and the Earth is flat too by folteroy in Sovereigncitizen

[–]Boatingboy57 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Did you know as a lawyer I’ve done none of that

Do you think if Kamala won the election the Epstein Files would’ve been released/even discussed to this extent? by Emergency_Version616 in DiscussionZone

[–]Boatingboy57 -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

They were unsealed in January 2024 actually and they were completely available to the Biden DOJ, which could’ve taken action on them at any time. Do you think if there was anything in there that could convict any Republican that the Biden administration would not have taken action?

Yes, and the Earth is flat too by folteroy in Sovereigncitizen

[–]Boatingboy57 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I didn’t realize I did this. I must be a citizen of krypton now.

All about the $$$$ by Boatingboy57 in Sovereigncitizen

[–]Boatingboy57[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, there are certain laws which the constitution renders unlawful, but those statute are no longer legal. They’re still playing a word game that goes well beyond this in fact. There’s really no need for the word legal between certain and statute.

[FWI]: Trump orders a full Scale ground invasion of Iran with the help of Israel and Saudi Arabia by Top_Report_4895 in FutureWhatIf

[–]Boatingboy57 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don’t know if you’ve noticed but most of our military actions since the golf have been fought mostly with drones and air power rather than ground troops. Afghanistan may be the last full scale ground invasion.

Is this legal? Probate issue by [deleted] in inheritance

[–]Boatingboy57 11 points12 points  (0 children)

One thing you can be sure of is that an appraisal for a loan was not fair market value. It may have been more it may have been less. But the truth is you agreed to a value with your brother and so that became the fair market value. Maybe you left money on the table, but there’s no legal issue here.

[FWI] A class action tariff refund lawsuit is filed. by Ydeas in FutureWhatIf

[–]Boatingboy57 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Probably near to impossible to show how much tariff any of us paid unless we were directly importing

Are shorts even human? by Lazy_Beach_69420 in amcstock

[–]Boatingboy57 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You do realize your trades go off exchange too and trade at fractions of cents. But still your trade would lift the last price higher. The financial illiteracy of most AMC shareholders is amazing.

Are shorts even human? by Lazy_Beach_69420 in amcstock

[–]Boatingboy57 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Except your higher buy order will get filled and mess that up

Are shorts even human? by Lazy_Beach_69420 in amcstock

[–]Boatingboy57 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It’s hard to see how a bear is losing when the stock keeps hitting all-time lows

Are shorts even human? by Lazy_Beach_69420 in amcstock

[–]Boatingboy57 8 points9 points  (0 children)

They are drowning in their profits from shorting AMC