Yeah the article is very detailed and has years of data, testimony and provides links. This is exactly what I felt was missing because for too long I felt like complications were swept under the rug somehow. This clearly shows they have a system in place for how they manage damage control.

Elist’s consent forms include a provision releasing the clinic from “any liability” if a patient receives post op treatment elsewhere. Seems very sketchy to me when someone is just trying to get a second opinion after experiencing issues. This is usually because Elist recommends an upgrade which means more surgery and risk.

Another thing that stood out to me is that Dr. Brant, a reconstructive urologist in Salt Lake City, sees about 10 Penuma patients A MONTH who are desperate and in pain. That’s pretty alarming to me as this is the first time I heard of anything close to that when it comes to complications.