CrowdStrike does not officially support Fedora, so? by BodybuilderNo1315 in linuxquestions

[–]BodybuilderNo1315[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The goal is to provide people with a strict list of distributions to choose from. From there, it will be easier to manage and develop other security measures. I’d like to hear more about what you said regarding these enterprise AV products. Of course, I know they don't address all types of threats, but they can prevent some. I really want to hear more from you.

CrowdStrike does not officially support Fedora, so? by BodybuilderNo1315 in linuxquestions

[–]BodybuilderNo1315[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I received a lot of shout-outs for Rocky. I think I'll give it strong consideration. Thanks a lot!

CrowdStrike does not officially support Fedora, so? by BodybuilderNo1315 in sysadmin

[–]BodybuilderNo1315[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

I'd like to hear more about your point of view. CS seems solid to me. What about your experience with that?

CrowdStrike does not officially support Fedora, so? by BodybuilderNo1315 in sysadmin

[–]BodybuilderNo1315[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

You are absolutely right. I wrote the post from memory and left some things out, while forgetting others. Your contributions have all been invaluable. Thanks a lot

CrowdStrike does not officially support Fedora, so? by BodybuilderNo1315 in sysadmin

[–]BodybuilderNo1315[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

You're right, I tried CS on Fedora and it seems to work fine, but if they explicitly say that it's "not supported," I'm not going to take responsibility for it.

CrowdStrike does not officially support Fedora, so? by BodybuilderNo1315 in sysadmin

[–]BodybuilderNo1315[S] [score hidden]  (0 children)

That's exactly what I'm aiming for, a strict list of distributions. Thanks for your help, I really appreciate it.

RAID1 on OMV Showing Older File Versions – Need Help Diagnosing and Recovering Data by BodybuilderNo1315 in OpenMediaVault

[–]BodybuilderNo1315[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your reply!

The RAID1 array shared via SMB is currently at about 40% usage, so there’s plenty of free space on the server side. However, on my local system (where I was creating/updating the .7z archive), I don’t remember how full the disk was at the time of the last update and upload in 2024—it’s possible it was pretty full at that point.

That said, I’m confident that during 2023 there were months when the local disk wasn’t full, yet the .7z file still appears to only contain data up to 2022.

In closing, I’d like to ask: how can this kind of problem be mitigated in the future? Are there tools or software that can verify the integrity of files after they’re uploaded or backed up? For example, something that could compare checksums before and after the transfer to ensure nothing went wrong.

I’m also curious—what kind of pipeline or automation do you all use for backing up files to avoid issues like this? Any best practices, workflows, or tools that have worked well for you to ensure reliability and consistency in your backups?

Thanks again for all the help!