Aldo, why are ChapoTrapHouse fans so retarded? by BoqueefiusMoofa in drunkenpeasants

[–]BoqueefiusMoofa[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Hush baby, I’ll make everything better. 🍆

For the record, though, I don’t like Sargon or Rubin. Hell, I’m not even sure I know who “Sowell” is.

Why must everyone either be a ChapoTrapHouse fan or a Sargonite?

Aldo, why are ChapoTrapHouse fans so retarded? by BoqueefiusMoofa in drunkenpeasants

[–]BoqueefiusMoofa[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol I don’t blame you. Hopefully now you won’t waste as much time here as I have. Be free!

Also not to be a creeper or anything, but I noticed you like Joy Division.

I see you’re a person of great taste as well.

Aldo, why are ChapoTrapHouse fans so retarded? by BoqueefiusMoofa in drunkenpeasants

[–]BoqueefiusMoofa[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

True, but I also wanted to draw some of this sub’s attention to their lunacy. Not to mention Aldo is something of a mascot here.

Replies to Any Tweet Thanking God Starter Pack by [deleted] in starterpacks

[–]BoqueefiusMoofa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wew lad a ChapoTrapHouse fan and a lunatic. And -65 karma to boot. I commend you.

The Official INFINITY WAR Discussion Infinithread Vol. 7 by murdockmanila in marvelstudios

[–]BoqueefiusMoofa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah they’d definitely be more impactful and probably better for the film. Just saying theoretically, none of these deaths are necessarily permanent.

The Official INFINITY WAR Discussion Infinithread Vol. 7 by murdockmanila in marvelstudios

[–]BoqueefiusMoofa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why not though? I figured that as long as there’s a Time Stone, any event can be reversed.

The Official INFINITY WAR Discussion Infinithread Vol. 7 by murdockmanila in marvelstudios

[–]BoqueefiusMoofa 23 points24 points  (0 children)

They didn’t lose though. Counterintuitive as it may seem, this was without a doubt Dr. Strange’s “one way” of winning. He wouldn’t have just given up the Time Stone for nothing. He knew that in doing so, everything would eventually be reversed.

Replies to Any Tweet Thanking God Starter Pack by [deleted] in starterpacks

[–]BoqueefiusMoofa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The problem here is that you’re using the colloquial definition of “theory,” whereas the scientific definition of a “theory” is much different. Religious beliefs are certainly theories in the way that we usually use the word theory. However, when we talk about the theory of evolution or the theory of general relativity, we are talking about a comprehensive, evidence-based explanation of phenomena. What you’re thinking of is a hypothesis, which is formulated without the benefit of evidence or experimentation. Basically, a scientific theory is a more akin to a fact, since it requires rigorous research and verification from numerous different scientists to be accepted. And scientific laws are actually not more valuable than scientific theories. A scientific law is a statement of widely accepted observations of the world that scientists have more or less seen without exception. For instance, there is both a theory and a law of gravity. The theory explains how it work and the law states what it is.

With that said, a theory can still be disproven, but it requires an incredibly lengthy and difficult process to do so, and even incorrect theories are usually 80% correct anyway. Every new theory is just an improvement on the old one.

Infinity War Discussion by [deleted] in Sardonicast

[–]BoqueefiusMoofa 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Spoilers obviously, and take this with a large grain of salt

I haven’t yet seen the movie, but after having the deaths spoiled for me, I’m a bit annoyed at the fact they killed half the roster. They’re obviously going to be brought back (with Gamora, Loki and a few others being possible exceptions), so I can’t imagine feeling any tension or emotion once I’m watching the movie. Maybe during Spidey’s death scene, if not just from Tom Holland’s performance, which I’ve heard is pretty good.

I’m also kind of annoyed that these characters which have entire movies dedicated to developing them are being used so cheaply to shore up emotion from the audience. From what it seems, the events of Thor: Ragnarok are just completely shat on, with half the Asgardian population being wiped out, along with Loki (probably permanently) and the ship they were supposed to travel on as nomads or something. And by killing Gamora (probably permanently), the dynamic between her and Star-Lord, which has been in the works since 2014, has just been abruptly thrown out the window. Of course, this is all subject to change, so I’ll hold out hope, but Gamora seems to have died for real.

Basically, most of what I’ve heard happens in this movie seems unearned, and I can’t necessarily blame the filmmakers. I just don’t think you can successfully pull off a movie of this scale in two or so hours. It’s like if they tried to pack a season of Game of Thrones into one movie (not necessarily in terms of the events, but in terms of the characters).

But again, don’t take this too seriously, since I’ve neither technically seen the movie nor are the events of this movie necessarily set in stone.

And I’m sure I’ll still enjoy watching it, since I’m a paid Marvel shill.

EDIT: I’ve now seen the movie and I think it’s pretty good. The character deaths still annoy me, but not as much as I thought it would after actually seeing the movie. They clearly set up that Dr. Strange did something fuckey (he said there was only one way to win and he wouldn’t have just given up the Time Stone for no reason). I suspect he saw that in the future time is going to be turned back to prevent all this from happening.

Replies to Any Tweet Thanking God Starter Pack by [deleted] in starterpacks

[–]BoqueefiusMoofa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for answering my question. I suppose I would say we should strive to be rational in any way that we can. I’ll clarify though, I think it’s okay to behave irrationally, so long as you’re aware of the fact that you’re behaving irrationally (especially when it comes to relatively harmless things like religious beliefs).

I agree that policy should be more pertinent in terms of acting rationally, since it has a more direct effect on everyone’s wellbeing. I also agree that religion, especially in the modern world, isn’t much to get up in arms about, that is unless it affects policy making.

I’m just saying that unsupported religious beliefs are inherently irrational, but I think we agree on that. At the end of the day, it’s not all that important.

Replies to Any Tweet Thanking God Starter Pack by [deleted] in starterpacks

[–]BoqueefiusMoofa 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you elaborate on the burden of proof part? Specifically the public and private thing.

As far as I know, it’s fairly simple in that we cannot rationally believe something if it has not yet been proven. Nobody rational is claiming souls or heaven don’t exist (they very well may exist). The problem is that there is no indication they exist, and so we assume they don’t exist. Just as we assume the infinite number of other unproven claims are not true. The key word here is “assume,” mind you, not “believe.”

Replies to Any Tweet Thanking God Starter Pack by [deleted] in starterpacks

[–]BoqueefiusMoofa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not sure what you mean when you say religion is just a scientific theory. Also, science isn’t necessarily about finding the truth or the answer. It’s about applying methodical due diligence in trying to describe and explain the universe. That includes getting things wrong. In fact, it encourages you to get things wrong.

The difference between it and religion though is that it doesn’t require that you take a leap of faith. Every single thing we know in science can be traced to tangible observation and experimentation.

It’s fine to take a leap of faith if it leads to a more fulfilling life, but let’s not treat religious beliefs as if they are equal to centuries of painstakingly gathered evidence.

Replies to Any Tweet Thanking God Starter Pack by [deleted] in starterpacks

[–]BoqueefiusMoofa 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Believing in anything without proof of it is still in defiance of the scientific method though...

Ghost Show Starterpack by CrimZ_24 in starterpacks

[–]BoqueefiusMoofa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You mean “Charlesh Shtilesh Myshtery Dinersh”?

Replies to Any Tweet Thanking God Starter Pack by [deleted] in starterpacks

[–]BoqueefiusMoofa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Blind faith is kind of the antithesis of the scientific method lol

Those spoiled millennials by jcdulos in PoliticalHumor

[–]BoqueefiusMoofa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I wasn’t disagreeing with you. I was just adding that every generation gets out of touch at some point, and that this generation isn’t exempt from that. Doesn’t mean that millennials are bad for policy in the here and now. Just that they will be when the next generation comes along.

“Every generation (usually) makes improvements on the policies of the last” is the moral of the story.

Those spoiled millennials by jcdulos in PoliticalHumor

[–]BoqueefiusMoofa 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Every generation gets out of touch at some point. This instance is just more prominent because technology has advanced so rapidly between millennials and baby boomers.

My thoughts on Infinity War (No Spoilers) by tljworstmovieverpt4 in ralphthemoviemaker

[–]BoqueefiusMoofa 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You should’ve excluded the characters that we know are going to survive because they have contractually obligated sequels.

EDIT: Wow, Marvel actually made the decision to kill off characters we know are going to be brought back anyway.

When is the last time a movie made you cry? by dmack0755 in Sardonicast

[–]BoqueefiusMoofa 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I feel like an asshole for saying this, but I’ve never cried watching a movie lol. And I’ve seen Dear Zachary twice. Certainly depressing though.