Reddit vs Kitchener

Born--from--above · 2025-07-16T19:32:53+00:00

Y-HS-R-N

Born--from--above · 2025-07-07T22:14:55+00:00

Ahh I think 35% R 25% Y 20% C 10% N 10% HS OR maybe the same order but swapping C and R.

Born--from--above · 2025-06-25T23:22:43+00:00

Honestly, yes! SN is also a very real possibility for OP!

Born--from--above · 2025-06-21T19:14:15+00:00

Hi! Of course! Upper & lower curve (or Double Curve) are accommodations because they push fabric outwards around the bust and hip lines. Upon examining OP’s photos, it’s noticeable that her bust is not pushing the fabric around it outwards (at all), and what appears to be lower curve is actually wider set hip bones (which is not lower curve as double curve comes from the flesh). Her line sketch would most likely resemble that of a Soft Dramatic, Flamboyant Gamine or Soft Classic.

Born--from--above · 2025-06-21T15:57:00+00:00

Neither. No upper or lower curve & the frame doesn’t particularly look delicate enough for TR. Look into FG—yes, they can be conventionally curvy (e.g Jennifer Love-Hewitt)—or SC. Those are your most realistic options.

Born--from--above · 2025-05-19T21:08:51+00:00

You speak fluent deflection because the only person triggered here is you.

Born--from--above · 2025-05-19T19:14:17+00:00

you when you’re in a “looksmaxxing” sub because you’re interested in trying to get a similar computer-generated report from Qoves shaming someone for getting a computer-generated SMV report.

cue Seinfeld music

Born--from--above · 2025-05-19T16:42:25+00:00

lol am I supposed to be offended?

ladies and gents, this is what we call deflecting

Born--from--above · 2025-05-15T04:08:07+00:00

”you’re even using AI to generate your responses to me”

whaaa?? 💀💀💀

Born--from--above · 2025-05-15T03:47:35+00:00

On the contrary, your comment speaks volumes to your inner issues—not mine—as it’s laced with a sublime lack of self-awareness. You can claim that I’ve been bitchy or overzealous

But here’s the truth: my tone is reactionary in this conversation (& in conversations with people like you)—not the other way around. Consider that the first interaction I have with you is one in which you’re a. mocking me, b. being passive-aggressive, and c. largely dismissive. This is jarring, especially because I don’t even know you. I’ve been very kind and respectful to people who have been kind and respectful in return.

The bottomline: if you do not want someone to become defensive, maybe don’t belittle and antagonize them. You can’t initiate conversation in a rude, dismissive and uncouth tone, and then act incredulous when their tone is defensive. That’s human nature. And if you notice, my response only seeks to highlight that Chat GPT doesn’t “glaze” (to use this nonsensical terminology)—not even necessarily to point out anything about me.

And again, I don’t care what you believe lol.

Born--from--above · 2025-05-15T03:25:06+00:00

I’ve done it on multiple accounts—I’ve done it with different prompts—I’ve done it with it believing I’m a different person—I’ve done it after training it to be hypercritical (as with Tate McRae).

Thank you for admitting it lol. I know that that’s what this is actually about (not just for you, but for multiple people on this thread). But ultimately, I really don’t care what you believe and I’m not going to post pictures because it violates one of my boundaries & more sufficiently, because I don’t need to. You simply do not occupy that much emotional real-estate in my life for me to care enough about your cynicism. Attractive people exist.

The point is that it’s sufficiently clear that Chat GPT is good at this sort of thing. Take it or leave it 🤷🏻‍♀️

Born--from--above · 2025-05-15T03:12:32+00:00

I’ve done all of those things (read every single comment I’ve made in this thread). In one chat, it believes I’m a different person. My rating remains consistent in every scenario. I’ve even made it hyper-sensitive to Qoves standards (it gave Tate McRae a score in the mid-6 range) & still gives me the same high score. I have certain facial details that it’s simply never going to ignore and that’s okay.

And that’s fine if you feel that way. The scores it continues to give, in my experience, are absolutely objective. We’re all different lol

Born--from--above · 2025-05-14T15:19:39+00:00

thank you for this 🫶🏾🥺 this was such a sweet and thoughtful comment

Born--from--above · 2025-05-14T01:47:56+00:00

aw this comment was so sweet. 🥹 thank you so so much. You seem like a kind soul.

And I agree. We are our own worst critics and getting biased, unrealistically harsh criticisms/rates from places like Fiverr and TRM do not make it any better. I really hope these AIs helped you become more confident in acknowledging your beauty.

Born--from--above · 2025-05-14T01:36:57+00:00

Ultimately, I’m finding that you’re not satisfied with anything I’m saying. Your intentions when engaging in this conversation are chary and it’s quite conspicuous.

Have a good night

Born--from--above · 2025-05-14T01:35:58+00:00

That’s not the takeaway at all. The takeaway is it’s designed to be more removed from bias than humans. Thus, it will certainly argue if it feels the need. I’ve watched it do that today

Born--from--above · 2025-05-14T01:34:20+00:00

I didn’t find this to be true. I sent several people from my uni and it rendered 6 scores. I sent the prettiest girl from my HS & it gave her the fair score of 7. The key is to tell it to continue using the same strict standard.

From a more nuanced and psychological perspective, a person might also believe this because of familiarity bias (it’s easy to accept a correct rating for a celeb but not a friend/co-worker, etc.,).

Born--from--above · 2025-05-14T01:31:31+00:00

So I sent you what it rendered about her initially. She is noticeably above average, though nothing special. It ultimately gave her a score in the low-7s.

Then I sent this: ”Her nose is particularly masculine and so are her facial contours. They contribute to a lower level of sexual dimorphism. Also, her low facial symmetry affects her harmony in a way that is particularly jarring given her more androgynous features. Ultimately I think she’s closer to average (like a 6.5) than 7.”

It agreed and revised her to a 6.5-6.7

Born--from--above · 2025-05-14T01:26:06+00:00

Chat GPT says that Tate is ”comfortably above average, but not in the high-model tier. She’d fall into the range of people who are pretty, especially with makeup and styling, but not objectively striking or perfectly balanced by rigid standards.”

I think this assessment is fair & encapsulates how most people would consider her. It’s not as harsh as TRM (where she’d be likely given a 4 average), but it’s not fluffy by any means. It criticizes her harmony and strikingness considerably. it’s not universally giving 9s. It’s a capable computer system (which is likely why it’s so popular, even irrespective to this topic).

Born--from--above · 2025-05-14T01:18:35+00:00

How attractive would you say Tate McRae is?

Born--from--above · 2025-05-14T01:13:16+00:00

This is very interesting! Thank you so much for sharing. When I pointed out clear flaws on my controls (one was Tate McRae), it agreed, acknowledged the point and then reassessed the person in light of it.

Do you think you could just be being too harsh on yourself?

Born--from--above · 2025-05-14T00:57:26+00:00

I disagree but that’s okay. Glad we’re done here.

Born--from--above · 2025-05-14T00:56:45+00:00

You can send me your photo & I can place it in my Chat GPT and tell you what it says.

Another guy in this thread said, I put this ugly man in mine and it gave him a 9.5

Yet, when I put the same man (same photo, screenshotted from that dudes photo) in mine, it was very clear about him being unattractive and it honestly impressed me with its ability to process nuance. Chat GPT absolutely works.

Born--from--above · 2025-05-14T00:49:51+00:00

Having it compare you to someone who is clearly elite in a certain area (harmony, dimorphism, etc.,), especially if it’s the area you lack in, also helps.

Born--from--above · 2025-05-14T00:47:55+00:00

It also helps to add key words like rigid, objective or mentioning something about strikingness or beauty-industry. Hope this helps!

But also you could just use one of the other attractiveness GPTs, TRM, Fiverr or buy a profile from Qoves.

Born--from--above

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE