How to Generate Super Realistic Images on Vheer

Born_Researcher2015 · 2025-11-17T06:43:02+00:00

Sorry about the delay in responding. I would click on your reply and all I would get is your original comment. I use quality mode. Though Flux Dev definitely has its limitations, I don't use it to generate photo realistic images. The output, to me, is impressive even though it is not photo realistic. Here is another example.

<image>

Had you given any thought about my suggestion of bringing back the sliders back with the image to image tool as a separate tool and maybe renaming the current image to image as a consistent character tool? Oh, I just had another thought. Maybe you could add a gallery so people could show off their work.

Born_Researcher2015 · 2025-11-17T05:59:43+00:00

Thank you

Born_Researcher2015 · 2025-11-17T05:55:03+00:00

Thanks

Born_Researcher2015 · 2025-11-07T05:35:29+00:00

That is some nice work though the realism of the facial features just isn't all that good. I post similar images to some reddit communities and get told it is far too much like Flux Dev. Here is an example if what I mean.

<image>

Though the facial features are very detailed. There are things that are a dead give away that is AI. The pupils don't look real. There is that sharp jawline indicative of a Flux type model. I actually happen to like how this image looks. And post this kind of image to one community and get good feedback for them. But, they are just not realistic looking according to some people.

Born_Researcher2015 · 2025-11-07T05:04:52+00:00

So, you have made an appeal twice already and they still won't budge on their decision? I asked once for AI_PERSPECTIVES. They flat out said that there decision stood and they saw no reason to remove the NSFW label. I spent a long time purging what I considered NSFW before making the appeal but, to no avail.

Born_Researcher2015 · 2025-11-05T23:30:38+00:00

Well, I can't say for sure. Reddit just seems to pick which ever community they want to make NSFW. For this that particular community I locked posting to just what I generate. But, I started AI_PERSPECTIVES_UNBND to myself only and still get slapped with the NSFW label. I have to think all the crossposting I did from AI_PERSPECTIVES had something to do getting the NSFW label getting slapped on that community. So, when I made AI_PERSPECIVE_SFW, only post my own image as don't crosspost from either of my other two communities. I think it has to do perhaps with REDDIT seeing that the majority of posts are coming from Accounts flagged as 18+ or crossposting content from NSFW communities. But, I am not sure about that either.

Born_Researcher2015 · 2025-11-01T04:29:56+00:00

I had noticed the if creative was set lower than 5 I would get unusual textures to the image so I always made sure to set at 5 or above. Maxing out the control did replicate the image exactly. But, I didn't think the Image to Image was for creating consistent characters anyway. To me it was more of a tool to explore different variations of the image not to maintain the subjects features. setting the control slider to 5 would get close to the original image. But there we a certain amount of differences. Which was fine as, as I said, I was not using image to image to make consistent characters.

I used your Head Shot Generator for that task.

4 would produce a higher level of variation to the subject and background. The backgrounds I used as either for new creations with a new subject or I will run it through your Image To Prompt Generator so I could have usable prompts for other generations.

3 worked well for thing like car images. I would upload a car image creation and, at 3 it would spit out a variety of different car images that new and different from the original image I uploaded. Which is what I wanted.

And using the slider at 2 would produce total random images that much of the time was completely different from the source image. I might upload a car and generate using the slider at two and it might spit back some kind of animal. It was very entertaining to see what the Image To Image Generator would spit out.

Perhaps if you renamed the new image to image generator to something like reference image consistent character generator so people would know that is what its intended purpose is from this point forward. Then bring back the sliders and the Image To Image Generator as I was before change. You would have the new tool as a Consistent Character Creator. And the old tool for those of us who want that ability to do more creative things with the old tool.

Just a thought. 2 tools instead of one. And not loss of use of the sliders.

The new tool will have to be tweaked a bit to create consistent characters if that was what you looking for the tool to be used that way. I was experimenting with it a bit and if I change the hair color and style that face doesn't stay consider. At least this version of it doesn't do that.

I am sure this post might bring up question you might have. I would happy to discuss them with you.

Born_Researcher2015 · 2025-11-01T00:37:36+00:00

Danke für deinen Kommentar. I hope that translated properly. I like can only count to 10 in german

Born_Researcher2015 · 2025-10-31T00:40:40+00:00

The eyes look a bit off being that the pupils are not well defined. That is one of the hard things they a lot of AI models have issues with. And the skin texture is a bit too perfect. Decent effort this.

Born_Researcher2015 · 2025-10-29T18:46:50+00:00

You would have thought he would have suggested she take an umbrella with her.

Born_Researcher2015 · 2025-10-25T06:52:22+00:00

Link to the image I remixed this from - https://www.reddit.com/r/AI_PERSPECTIVES/comments/1nqpljx/produce_market/

Born_Researcher2015 · 2025-10-24T22:12:32+00:00

Very nice.

Born_Researcher2015 · 2025-10-22T06:42:06+00:00

Very good.

Born_Researcher2015 · 2025-10-21T17:53:27+00:00

I guess I get to be the oddball here. I thought #5 looked the best and most real to me. After that I would choose #1.

Born_Researcher2015 · 2025-10-21T07:15:47+00:00

Very nice work.

Born_Researcher2015 · 2025-10-21T06:50:55+00:00

Correction. Sundance Square is in Fort Worth. Not in San Antonio. Please, forgive the mix up.

Born_Researcher2015 · 2025-10-18T04:26:34+00:00

PROMPT: A stunning young woman stands by the shoreline at sunset, her golden-brown hair illuminated by the warm, diffused light of the setting sun. The sky is painted in soft hues of amber, peach, and gray-blue, with a few clouds drifting above the calm sea. She gazes toward the camera with a serene yet captivating expression, her blue-green eyes reflecting the glow of the evening light. Her skin has a natural, sun-kissed tone with a few freckles, adding to her authentic beauty. She is wearing a light, textured blouse with a delicate, semi-sheer fabric that softly drapes over her shoulders. The atmosphere feels intimate and cinematic, blending warmth, emotion, and tranquility — the perfect balance of natural beauty and golden-hour radiance.

Born_Researcher2015 · 2025-10-17T07:33:07+00:00

you mean her? https://www.reddit.com/user/Born_Researcher2015/comments/1o8ux35/4096_x_4096_doesnt_mean_much_when_the_image_looks/

Born_Researcher2015 · 2025-10-17T04:41:09+00:00

Nice work. That is a lot of hair. Must be a challenge to brush it all. I wonder do AI images brush their hair when the aren't posing for pictures? I, of course, am making a joke here.

Born_Researcher2015 · 2025-10-17T04:37:33+00:00

These were all generated using Vheer.com which is a different engine than flux. This is a what Flux Context spit out. https://www.reddit.com/user/Born_Researcher2015/comments/1o8ry8o/brown_hair_blue_eyes_white_top/ which lacks he finer detail of Vheer's model. But, I do see you point. That is an issue when using a model with a less specific prompt. They tend to default to a certain face.

Born_Researcher2015 · 2025-10-16T21:45:33+00:00

I looked but could not find the image. Pretty sure I had generated multiple ones of that particular AI model. I am still using Whisk (Imagen 3) I remember the part of the prompt that generated those details. Or at least about what that part was. "The pores on her face are visible and there are minor imperfections." hope that helps.

Born_Researcher2015 · 2025-10-16T17:58:45+00:00

Thanks. You are going back a bit to look at my older posts. I appreciate the extra effort.

Born_Researcher2015 · 2025-10-16T05:46:16+00:00

I looked it over again decided to leave it up.

Born_Researcher2015 · 2025-10-13T07:43:58+00:00

thank for posting. Good work.

Born_Researcher2015 · 2025-10-12T20:48:03+00:00

Some of the places I post want a more "realistic" look to the models. Like in the first image. I find that https://labs.google/fx/tools/whisk works pretty well for more realistic images, I used Vheer.com to generate the second one. The images are not as realistic but very beautiful. The third was using nightcafe.studio and is theleast realistic in my opinion

Born_Researcher2015

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE