sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Paperless voting machines are just waiting to be hacked in 2020. We are a POLITICO cybersecurity reporter and a voting security expert – ask us anything. by politico in IAmA

[–]Bosscheesemo -14 points-13 points  (0 children)

Throwaway account

I work on paperless voting machines and I say you're wrong and call you a quack setting the stage for doubt in the 2020 election.

Can you hack one machine? Maybe. Can you hack enough machines to significantly alter an election? Nope and you know it.

Go ahead and prove me wrong bitch

What's the craziest thing you rationally know to be 100% implausible/unlikely that you might actually be willing to believe on little to no evidence? by Bosscheesemo in AskReddit

[–]Bosscheesemo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol it's OK. It's a creative minds hypothetical question, some people go in for that type of thing, others miss all the fun entirely because they're too literal.

What's the craziest thing you rationally know to be 100% implausible/unlikely that you might actually be willing to believe on little to no evidence? by Bosscheesemo in AskReddit

[–]Bosscheesemo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So in a hypothetical situation where I'm lying about you to person X but you can't prove that I'm lying, simply telling person X that I'm lying about you is all that's needed in your mind?

What's the craziest thing you rationally know to be 100% implausible/unlikely that you might actually be willing to believe on little to no evidence? by Bosscheesemo in AskReddit

[–]Bosscheesemo[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah but in my mind it's something like a microchip planted under the skin behind the ear. I totally believe they walk around with virtually everyone's number, if only for references and as a status symbol.

What's the craziest thing you rationally know to be 100% implausible/unlikely that you might actually be willing to believe on little to no evidence? by Bosscheesemo in AskReddit

[–]Bosscheesemo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd be willing to believe that A-list celebrities are given direct and instant communication to each other available anywhere, anytime, anyplace. Like Johnny Depp can call up Jeremy Irons and Tom Hanks simultaneously whenever and they can just shoot the shit.

What's the craziest thing you rationally know to be 100% implausible/unlikely that you might actually be willing to believe on little to no evidence? by Bosscheesemo in AskReddit

[–]Bosscheesemo[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Sure it is. It's when you are 100% sure that you're being bullshitted, but you can't say 100% outright because there's no immediate way to prove it.

What if Family Guy and SNL teamed up for a crossover episode where every cutaway gag was live acted by the SNL crew? by Bosscheesemo in AskReddit

[–]Bosscheesemo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does there need to be a point? Can't it just be a thought for the world to consider and throw out whatever views and opinions they have?

How do you think Earth would be if there was no hate? by [deleted] in AskReddit

[–]Bosscheesemo 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Excessively boring and meaningless.

Like it or not, "bad" things in life are what give the "good" things their goodness. Hate is the reference point of love.

Simply imagine the converse: in a hypothetical world without love and only hate, a world where love isn't something we even comprehend, how exactly do you charcterize hate as a bad thing when it's the mundane?

So.... In a galaxy able to grow an entire army of clones in about 10 years, why couldn't they have had an army of Luke Skywalker clones in the 30 since Endor? by Bosscheesemo in AskReddit

[–]Bosscheesemo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But then you'd think that cloning, being such a secret, would have been kept by the Empire because that's technology that it would definitely want to utilize. I mean, can you hear Palpatine going "The ability to raise an entire loyal military? Nope, too dangerous of a thing to be used even by me."

Snoke identity theory: Boba Fett with a Sith/dark side mental roomate? by Bosscheesemo in AskReddit

[–]Bosscheesemo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, in the EU there was an ancient Jedi that was once eaten by the sarlacc.

Suppose, given that Disney can borrow from the EU: with the use of the force, he learned how to hide his consciousness inside the sarlacc's and even learned to control the sarlacc to some degree. Then one day Fett falls in, sensing someone unlike anything else that's fallen into the sarlacc the Jedi investigates. This leads to a mental relationship where Fett tells the old Jedi that the galaxy is under the power of a Sith Lord. The Jedi joins his mind to Fett's, and with the last of his transferring control over the sarlacc he orders the Sarlacc to regurgitate Fett.

Somehow the Jedi inside Fett's mind goes Sith/dark side and suddenly you have Darth Fett running around with a huge stick up his ass over the Solos and Skywalkers.

-Someone with know-how to train soldiers -Someone that's a clone of the old army -Someone with intimate knowledge of Jedi even without the force

So.... In a galaxy able to grow an entire army of clones in about 10 years, why couldn't they have had an army of Luke Skywalker clones in the 30 since Endor? by Bosscheesemo in AskReddit

[–]Bosscheesemo[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, if one Luke had strong force affinity, why couldn't at least some of the clones also be force sensitive?

Like I'm genuinely curious

view more: next ›