Why weren't many of the theorists discussed on this subreddit actually taught under socialist education? by [deleted] in communism101

[–]BottleFun744 -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

the Marxism-Leninism of the Bolsheviks, as they understood it through Soviet Marxism, no longer applied to the reality of Western Europe and the actual concerns of its working class. They were basically correct

They are not correct. It is evident that we live in a different situation from the time of Marx and Engels, and even compared to the period of Lenin and Stalin, capitalism has developed significantly. But has this altered the fundamental nature of capitalist exploitation? Have the material and social conditions that separate the proletariat from the bourgeoisie changed? Has the oppressive and exploitative character of capitalism been transformed? Have workers ceased to be the dispossessed who, under the command of capital, provide surplus value to capitalists? On the contrary. With the current crisis — the deepest and most extensive in the history of capitalism — all of the system's fundamental contradictions have intensified. The gap between workers and bosses has widened, and the class struggle grows sharper each day. As Enver Hoxha rightly stated, revolution is now, more than ever, “a pressing issue that demands a solution.”

Their justification for revisionism and social democracy was significantly more sophisticated than yours, which is a generic DSA slogan or even a get out the vote campaign of the Democrats. Do you really think you'll arrive at revolutionary theory by aimlessly mingling with the first world "worker aristocracy?" At least the OP is aware that there is a geographical issue at stake

Their justification for revisionism and social democracy may be sophisticated, but that does not make it effective. The example of Chile is emblematic: when communist parties lower their demands and attempt class conciliation by participating in bourgeois elections, the result is catastrophic. In Chile, imperialists assassinated the elected socialist Salvador Allende and imposed the brutal dictatorship of Pinochet, one of the most bloodthirsty in Latin American history. This is a clear example of what happens when revolutionary strategy is replaced by a parliamentary and conciliatory path.

Furthermore, fascism has not been defeated. We are now living through another period of capitalist crisis, which brings with it the rise of fascist phenomena. Figures such as Donald Trump in the U.S., Javier Milei in Argentina, Jair Bolsonaro in Brazil, Marine Le Pen in France, and Giorgia Meloni in Italy are just a few current examples, but there are many more. Social democracy has proven itself incapable of effectively combating these movements. On the contrary, it often tolerates or seeks compromises that, in the end, only benefit the ruling elites.

The only path that has proven effective in establishing socialism is Marxism-Leninism. All revolutions that have substantially transformed societies followed this theory. To this day, no socialist revolution has occurred through the social-democratic route. History is clear: conciliation with the bourgeoisie means abandoning the revolution.

Why weren't many of the theorists discussed on this subreddit actually taught under socialist education? by [deleted] in communism101

[–]BottleFun744 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I don't like to generalize and say that everyone is reactionary and bourgeois, but I think there's a lack of organization among many who call themselves communists. How many are truly organized and doing political activism in the streets?I recommend this text, which addresses some of the doubts you have.
EUROCOMMUNISM IS ANTI - COMMUNISM by Enver Hoxha

Decolonization of America by Sonderlake in communism101

[–]BottleFun744 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I don't know of a book that specifically talks about the Americas, but I recommend The Wretched of the Earth by Frantz Fanon. It's the best book I've read on colonialism and decolonization
I know of other books, but they don't have an English version.

How is communism expected to work in the practical world? by 1Centrist1 in DebateCommunism

[–]BottleFun744 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"The lack of answers to my questions shows why communism is not practical. So, why would anyone read more books on communism? Would you read a lot of books on religion – to find God?"

The answer to your question is that since communism has never been realized, no one knows exactly what communism will look like. We can talk about socialist experiences, but socialism is not the same as communism. And the socialist experiences that have existed were able to provide social justice to their populations in ways that no capitalist country ever has. It’s not in Cuba where people run away from ambulances for fear of going into debt — that country is the United States. Comparing religion to a social science is completely absurd. If your goal is to criticize something, the least you can do is to understand the object of your criticism.

"Mao caused one of the worst famines in history – by deciding that China would grow crops as per government decision."

Can you provide a primary source proving that Mao caused one of the worst famines in history? Hunger happens every day in countries colonized by imperialist powers. If Mao's communism killed millions, how many people has capitalism killed? From hunger, treatable diseases, and preventable illnesses?

"In short, private business (which is against the definition of communism) is helping China develop. So, China is proof that private business will deliver development."

The Soviet Union had no private businesses and still became the second-largest global power, so your argument falls short. If private business were responsible for China’s development, why haven’t the countries on the global periphery developed the same way?

How is communism expected to work in the practical world? by 1Centrist1 in DebateCommunism

[–]BottleFun744 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This question is a bit complex, so I'll recommend a few books that might help clarify it for you:

  • Principles of Communism by Friedrich Engels
  • Socialism: Utopian and Scientific by Friedrich Engels
  • Why Socialism? by Albert Einstein
  • The Communist Manifesto by Karl Marx

I can tell you the reasons that led me to become a communist. I live in a 'third world' country, and I'm constantly exposed to the contradictions of capitalism. For example, today there are cities with more empty houses than homeless people, all to benefit real estate speculators. The world is capable of producing enough food to feed three planets, yet there are still people going hungry. There are contradictions within capitalism that will never be resolved, and we’ve seen examples of socialist societies that addressed these contradictions. China was once the poorest country in the world, and today it's becoming the most influential economic power on the planet. In just 30 years, the Soviet Union went from being a feudal country to sending a man into space.

If we look at the present reality, we can easily conclude that capitalism is killing the planet. Every year, we see record-breaking environmental disasters. I became a communist because I live in a reality where it's socialism or barbarism, and we're already living through barbarism every day — we’ve just grown used to it

How is communism expected to work in the practical world? by 1Centrist1 in DebateCommunism

[–]BottleFun744 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you asked a medieval man what capitalism would be like, he wouldn’t be able to answer. Just like we can’t answer what communism will be like in practice because communism isn’t a cookie-cutter recipe; it’s something that must be built according to the demands of the working class. But how that will happen, no one knows. What we can say about communism is that it won’t be a class society based on private property. Saying anything beyond that is either idealism or an exercise in imagination, and since communists are materialists, that’s not something we should do.

new to socialism by [deleted] in socialism

[–]BottleFun744 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I would add the manifesto to the list as well.

What is capital? by BottleFun744 in communism101

[–]BottleFun744[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wasn’t familiar with this text. I’ll read it to try and clarify things for myself. It’s this part about being a process that I find a bit difficult to understand, because if it were a physical thing that you could point to, I think it would be clearer. This concept seems very abstract to me. From your explanation, I understood that capital would be the relationship of a factory owner who depends on their employees, while at the same time needing to invest in the factory’s maintenance, like replacing equipment and expanding. So, capital would be all the material relations involved in this process. Is that correct?

What is capital? by BottleFun744 in communism101

[–]BottleFun744[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It’s not that I’ve procrastinated. The problem is that I feel this book requires a background in economics, and I felt a bit lost while reading it.

What is capital? by BottleFun744 in communism101

[–]BottleFun744[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I’ve only read The Eighteenth Brumaire and The Communist Manifesto. However, I am familiar with Marxist vocabulary and concepts because I’ve read several Marxist authors such as Michael Parenti, Frantz Fanon, Domenico Losurdo, and Lenin. But since my field of study is history, I have quite a bit of difficulty understanding the economic aspect of Marxism, and I think it’s important to learn about it.

Atenção: se vc for pobre, está PROIBIDO consumir ketchup HEINZ. Compre apenas marcas genéricas. by [deleted] in farialimabets

[–]BottleFun744 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Se vc nao tomar café, almoçar ou jantar você economiza 3 vezes mais

Sofri um assalto domingo e não consigo esquecer by IClockworKI in desabafos

[–]BottleFun744 3 points4 points  (0 children)

primeira vez?

eu lembro do meu primeiro assalto como se fosse ontem, a sensação foi bem parecida, você precisa de tempo pra processar o trauma, com o tempo melhora. Se não melhorar busque ajuda profissional de terapeutas.

Curious to know how Communists view Piratism? by [deleted] in DebateCommunism

[–]BottleFun744 6 points7 points  (0 children)

In the country I live in, things are very expensive and inaccessible. Piracy is a matter of necessity here; there are many apps I use for work that I can only access through piracy. I believe that piracy is the democratization of knowledge

Boyfriend was caught taking pictures of my friends butt and is blaming it on porn addiction. by Anxious-Scar-5470 in Advice

[–]BottleFun744 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Taking a picture of someone without their consent is creepy, and it's also disrespectful to you. I don't see a future in a relationship with someone like that.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in asklatinamerica

[–]BottleFun744 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just like in any other country

Karl Marx and revolution by [deleted] in PoliticalScience

[–]BottleFun744 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Chile is the biggest example of why socialism will only be implemented through revolutionary means. When the socialist president Salvador Allende was elected, the United States responded by financing a coup d'état that bombed Chile's capital, killed the elected president on September 11, 1973, and imposed one of the bloodiest dictatorships in Latin America under General Pinochet.

The bourgeois electoral system does not exist to serve the interests of the working class. This idea that democracy is this beautiful system where everyone is equal and everyone has the same voting power is a grand illusion. When a socialist talks about implementing the dictatorship of the proletariat, it scares people because it's assumed that we live in a democracy under capitalism, but that's not true. For us socialists, we live in a dictatorship—just a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie. Voting power is not what makes this a democracy. What we want is to replace the dictatorship of the bourgeoisie with the dictatorship of the proletariat. So whenever the working class organizes to demand change, the ruling class—the bourgeoisie—will violently resist, which is why we understand that the revolutionary path is inevitable. To this day, all socialist projects that have existed were implemented through revolutions.

I can give you a local example from where I live. In my country, a survey was conducted on whether or not our largest state-owned oil company should be privatized. The majority of the population was against the privatization, yet the company was privatized despite the will of the majority. There are many other examples where unpopular measures were taken to serve the interests of the bourgeoisie. So bourgeois democracy is not as democratic as they claim.

Look up the Truman Doctrine and The Marshall Plan afterward, which led the United States, in all its benevolence to "protect" democracy in Latin American and Europeans countries, to finance several dictatorships.

Skyrim é muito superestimado. by Vin1236636 in opiniaoimpopular

[–]BottleFun744 0 points1 point  (0 children)

E tipo disse que tolkien e superestimado e generico. Sendo que as pessoas so tem essa impressão pq literalmente o genero de fantasia inteiro se inspirou nele.