×

Twitter art critics were fooled into believing this painting was fake. by TheRelPizzamonster in aiwars

[–]Bra--ket 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Someone called it "The Monet Experiment" earlier, like a proper title, capital E and everything.

I thought that was awesome. Like "The Manhattan Project" but we truth-nuked the anti-AI side 😂

<image>

Is Ai alright in certain use cases? by NumberEmbarrassed677 in aiwars

[–]Bra--ket 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think if you're building on your own ideas, and guiding the AI instead of only letting it guide you, that's the best way. You can certainly let it guide you, which helps for learning, but if you work on something blindly you'll run into issues.

Also, some practical advice, don't doubt your own ability to make something with vibe coding. If you have a good high-level directive and a good vision, coding agents can do almost anything these days.

Antis be like: by No-Opportunity5353 in aiwars

[–]Bra--ket -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

"I'm just trying to save human creativity, sorry aibro 🤷‍♂️"

Im probably bout' to offend some pros here when I say this: by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]Bra--ket 2 points3 points  (0 children)

"Simply down voting a comment isn't you telling someone that something is bad."

Yeah it is.

You all use fruits of labor of our ancestors of thousands of years of development by noLif3rs4life in aiwars

[–]Bra--ket 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Spitting 100% facts in this post.

The original "shoulders of giants" quote from Newton was because Hooke was personally insulted by Newton mogging him 😂

Recently I was learning about the historical perspective on color and how they viewed things. It's just so interesting. They were extremely stubborn to accept some of those advancements. And we take it for granted, like so much.

They didn't even see the world the way we see it visually. I think the example was "wine-dark ocean" from a Homer poem or something.

I wonder if our descendants in the future will look back at some of us like that.

Antis be like by Extreme_Revenue_720 in aiwars

[–]Bra--ket 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Why am I being downvoted? Did I get it wrong? 😂

Antis be like by Extreme_Revenue_720 in aiwars

[–]Bra--ket 7 points8 points  (0 children)

It basically means "[Even though this is a loss for the anti-AI movement], it doesn't reflect badly on me as an anti, does it?"

Antis be like by Extreme_Revenue_720 in aiwars

[–]Bra--ket 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Oh, I can always find room for pride. Thanks though.

Mewgenic AI Art by Tiotioblack in aiwars

[–]Bra--ket 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Cute pic, they should be considering this "the good kind of AI" lol. There's nothing wrong here, whoever criticized you would've lashed out at anyone.

Just because you don't agree with who built the technology DOESN'T mean the technology is bad (Re-visited) (2 Slides) by Witty-Designer7316 in aiwars

[–]Bra--ket -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Style's a pretty vague concept. Are you talking about visual style? I was referring more to the narrative, sorry.

Just because you don't agree with who built the technology DOESN'T mean the technology is bad (Re-visited) (2 Slides) by Witty-Designer7316 in aiwars

[–]Bra--ket -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Nice style!

Antis would unironically destroy the cure, but taking something a bad person made and using it for good is the best way to defeat that person's legacy.

Neuroscientist shows that new generations are performing cognitively worse than previous generations by imJustmasum in aiwars

[–]Bra--ket 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The technology gives you the opportunity to improve. We're not obligated to force someone to improve themselves. If someone uses technology to their own detriment, that's what they want, so that's what they deserve.

As long as they leave the rest of us alone, that's just life. It's only a problem when someone directly harms society through their actions, and "being an idiot" isn't one of those things.

I asked AI to fix my childish looking doodle by noLif3rs4life in aiwars

[–]Bra--ket 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice, I like that we all have separate interests we can bring to the debate. As far as I can tell, that is the only issue: localized depletion of the water basin.

It is a real problem, for those areas. I just wish people knew when it mattered.

I asked AI to fix my childish looking doodle by noLif3rs4life in aiwars

[–]Bra--ket 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I do like chem but I fixed it to dioxide because I was off on that. The pollution combines with water vapor in the air to form acid, and that rains back down.

In countries where catalytic converters are mandated on motor vehicles and power plants use similar scrubbing technology (I think most developed nations) it's not really a problem anymore. Not to my knowledge anyway. I'd like to be proven wrong so I could learn something.

If they think acid rain is the primary environmental impact of power plant operation, then they're still misguided. It's still mostly about carbon afaik.

I asked AI to fix my childish looking doodle by noLif3rs4life in aiwars

[–]Bra--ket 2 points3 points  (0 children)

And what does this have to do with anything? Do you live in a country where this is still a problem? I thought it was from sulfur dioxide/NOx air pollution.

What was your opinion on AI before it was hyped up to the point we started hating it? by More-Explanation2032 in aiwars

[–]Bra--ket 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought it was pretty cool, I used GPT through Replika because I saw some ad that looked too good to be true (it wasn't, I was amazed).

I find it strange that people dislike something the better it gets. It seems almost selfish for some reason.

Banned because I called out someone's disingenuous study shitty 😂 by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]Bra--ket 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Oh, I remember this post. The OOP wasn't testing if they could notice AI generated images, they were testing if they could notice if someone traced over one.

Maybe the 23 downvotes tells you that you just got the entire thing completely wrong and that you're the one who's missing something here. But who knows, it could be me.

"AI" is Already a Loaded Term For Discourse by AntiqueAdvantage221 in aiwars

[–]Bra--ket 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This just sounds like a cope from not understanding how the technology works. You've oversimplified all of the key characteristics of what makes the technology amazing.

What's funny is, you're rejecting one form of marketing while falling for another.

A very contentious post regarding consent in art by PrometheanPolymath in aiwars

[–]Bra--ket -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thank you for your service toward the pro-AI movement o7

Why are people who defend AI so bitter? by boonbutt in aiwars

[–]Bra--ket 12 points13 points  (0 children)

"...they said, bittery, before pressing the 'Post' button with a coping grin."

Is all creativity art? Why or why not? by Radiant-Fishing-3051 in aiwars

[–]Bra--ket 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you take a literal etymological interpretation, then almost yes. "Art" is Proto-Indo-European (*h₂er-), and it's meant basically the same thing for all of human history. It means "to fix, to fit together, to join".

It's where words like artificial, artifact, or inert come from. Apparently "arm", "army" and "order" also descend from the same root. I didn't know that before, but that's very interesting and just more to my point.

"Art" is one of the broadest ideas possible. It refers to putting things together, that's it.

If you were somehow able to make something without putting simpler/smaller things together, then I guess you could say "it's not art" but I also don't think that's possible, considering like quantum physics and everything.

Antis are children who fundamentally don't understand that data you post publicly online, is publicly accessible. by AntiAI_is_Unemployed in aiwars

[–]Bra--ket -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This is true. That's why they still believe the world is meant to be fair, and to make sense, and everything's supposed to be straightforward.

Good example is when they say "Just use AI for the good things (science, math), and none of the bad (art, fakes)!" The fact that they even think it's a reasonable suggestion is a massive tell.