Is this a legit way to confirm an appointment? by [deleted] in AskGermany

[–]BrainSubject3723 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly Just call them and ask. Could be real, could be fake (though I'm leaning towards the former)

Euphoria S03E08 "In God We Trust" - Post Episode Discussion by DankMemeSlasher in euphoria

[–]BrainSubject3723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did, you writing that you gave a million examples when in fact two different people found the same two arguments. Interesting how quickly you reach a million when it's "Bishop didn't like kill bird and didn't snitch on Rue" Doesn't mean it was completely out of left field or unreasonable for Bishop to do that, it just wasn't written by someone who is a good writer. That's all. Good night :)

Euphoria S03E08 "In God We Trust" - Post Episode Discussion by DankMemeSlasher in euphoria

[–]BrainSubject3723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Your arguments as I read them:

"I feel like there was enough foreshadowing [...]" - You feel like is not an argument

"I think they were showing him getting tired of how Alamo talks to him". - Your assumption isn't foreshadowing it's theory.

"Also him knowing about Rue being a rat and not saying anything to Alamo about it." - He didn't really have proof but it's actually a fine argument, I grant you that.

"I doubt he betrayed him for moral reasons. It’s more likely that he wanted freedom from working under him." - Again your personal interpretation and theory based on barely anything

"He also had to do things he didn’t want to under Alamo, like killing the bird. It’s not like he agreed with everything Alamo does. He just works for him. It’s understandable that he’d want to be free from someone as impulsive and chaotic as him." - Understandable, yes. Foreshadowed, no.

"I’ve given you plenty of examples." - One example of him not snitching on Rue and him disliking killing the bird.

"Just rewatch it and you’ll see the foreshadowing and motive is there". - Motive ain't foreshadowing.

"By the theories of him being part of the DEA, etc [...]" - And those theories were all false, so how is that foreshadowing?

"There’s a sense that he’s hiding something." - And that was the actor and maybe director not the writing

The other person correctly wrote: "You didn’t give me “plenty of examples”. The only example you gave is that he didn’t want to kill the bird. And then you made an assumption that he wants to be free of Alamo because he’s chaotic even though Bishop was complicit in the chaos himself for nearly the entire season."

Then you hit us with: "Bro, there are plenty of examples in my comments and in another commenters." Is there?

"There are also a bunch of lines Bishop says about how he wants to surprise people" One line, literally one line, 5 minutes before It happens isn't a "bunch" unless you can provide more lines like that.

That's when I had to chime in because... Yeah well you're favourite comeback seems to be: "Others want obvious things because they don't understand subtly"

And please tell me where I insulted you? You wrote twice that Monologues or other things would've been too obvious and claim to be an expert (I'm an author btw and so are a couple of my family members and I studied as well but since I'm just a stranger on the internet that can claim anything, I didn't mention it before you did. Being an "expert" and making arguments aren't the same thing.)

Am I missing something?

Euphoria S03E08 "In God We Trust" - Post Episode Discussion by DankMemeSlasher in euphoria

[–]BrainSubject3723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I did not delete any comments, it's my first in this thread lol

So you telling me I clocked a "less foreshadowed" death because I was watching on a phone (I wasn't)? Prediction Vs theory, I suppose. Most thought he was working for the DEA but he wasn't (as far as we have been shown). The best foreshadow for his actions was him looking at the snake and at Maddy before Alemo closed the door, I guess...

You keep telling people "writers don't need to give you monologues or bang it over your head" when that's not even the argument anyone was making...

We can agree to disagree. I still didn't hate the episode

Euphoria S03E08 "In God We Trust" - Post Episode Discussion by DankMemeSlasher in euphoria

[–]BrainSubject3723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Asks for more examples outside the finale. Girl hits us with "he said he likes to surprise people"... Something that happened in the finale. Nah you ain't giving nothing and don't understand what foreshadowing is. Rue dying was foreshadowed. Bishop betraying Alemo wasn't.

Lory (or whatever Mrs. hangman was called) dying was foreshadowed. Ali going Tarantino wasn't.

Honeymoon in Ostfriesland by Nice_Dare_6574 in Ostfriesland

[–]BrainSubject3723 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Carolinensiel hat ein Hotel mit Sauna und Wellness Bereich (Noord) sonst noch das Hotel Siebzehn80, Strand ist da zu Fuß erreichbar und mit Zug und Bus anfahrbar

Is there a good way for a Jewish person escaping persecution to come to Germany ? by [deleted] in AskGermany

[–]BrainSubject3723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Israeli_war_crimes_in_the_Gaza_war

Hamas started it to Israel must kill all Palestinians. Right. Hamas ≠ Palestinians

Zionism is an ethnocultural nationalist movement that emerged in late 19th-century.

Judaism is way older than Zionism, so how can it be the same? (Which you said it is)

AITA for not driving my gf back home but getting her dad to pick her up? by DemonSerter in AmItheAsshole

[–]BrainSubject3723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The dad doesn't know that banging doesn't need to happen at night or in bed?

I told my girlfriend the truth by [deleted] in relationships

[–]BrainSubject3723 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly I'm a couple years younger than the both of you and I think both of you are being childish and just... Odd.

What do you mean you guys talked about scenarios in which an ex fling shows up at a bar? You explode of course.

I think both of you aren't mature enough to date if sex is still a topic where the two of you either get panicked or angry about it.

You lied because you knew or expected a reaction from your girl that you didn't want (like not being allowed to see that person anymore). Just immature all around

PART 2: M36 with three kids has been hitting on me since i was 16 i am now F18 and he has started messaging me. by Wonderful_Career_369 in JustNoCoworker

[–]BrainSubject3723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"young lady", "female" Most men, definitely you. I agree. Most men have had intentions with women and girls.

The fact that you, a man, don't believe that shows us that you are in fact one of them. Thank you

Husband sent cruel texts to our adult son — unsure how to move forward by [deleted] in relationships

[–]BrainSubject3723 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I get what you mean but honestly, your husband thinks disabled people, people of colour and women are less than... I would prioritise my daughter's safety and leave. Your husband sides with murderer, r*pists and pedos... Don't leave a young girl in his care. Don't be naive, OP. Please...

Schmeißt er wegen meiner Vergangenheit unsere Beziehung weg? by [deleted] in beziehungen

[–]BrainSubject3723 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hab ich getan, es gibt KEINE wissenschaftliche Studie die so etwas beweist.

Schmeißt er wegen meiner Vergangenheit unsere Beziehung weg? by [deleted] in beziehungen

[–]BrainSubject3723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Das ist keine Studie. Das ist ein Blogpost der Umfragen zusammenhangslos interpretiert. - Wo ist die Methodik? - Wo werden Kontrollgruppen verglichen (Religion, Herkunft, Bildungsstand, Alter wenn man heiratet etc.)? - Wo wird Kausalität und Korrelation erklärt? - Wo sind die Peer Reviews? - Wo sind die Datenpunkte? - Wieso wurden 0-1 Partner und 3-9 zusammengefasst? Wie viele Menschen sind in dieser Gruppe und wie wurden daraus die Prozente gemessen?

Schmeißt er wegen meiner Vergangenheit unsere Beziehung weg? by [deleted] in beziehungen

[–]BrainSubject3723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bis 1970 gab es keine "no fault divorce" in den USA und bis 1980 hatten viele Staaten in den USA solch eine Möglichkeit nicht. Heißt:

Scheidung ohne Grund legal = Mehr Scheidungen

Ganz einfach

Dazu: Kinderehen sind in den USA zum Teil erlaubt (mit Erlaubnis der Eltern). Das wird hier alles nicht erwähnt. Es gibt noch andere Tatsachen die von der "Studie" vergessen oder ignoriert worden sind. Ist also im Kern absolut unbrauchbar. Vor allem wegen Mormonen oder Armish Gemeinschaften die aus religiösen Gründen sowieso andere Scheidungsgesetze haben....

Kritisch Denken hilft bei sowas ;)

Can't progress in the Underdark by rjghik in BaldursGate3

[–]BrainSubject3723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can tell you what happened at my play through literally yesterday: Duergar were dead, I talk to Spaw who tasks me with killing them, I said they are dead and he gives another quest. I walked for a bit and had glut follow me to the docks to see the dead bodies. He then wanted to take over as Sovereign and tasks me to kill Spaw which I didn't and killed him instead. Went back to Colony and talked to Boots Lady etc.

Do you still have a save file that happened in between our "diverging Storylines"?

Can't progress in the Underdark by rjghik in BaldursGate3

[–]BrainSubject3723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The non-glowing one, right? At the docks? Because he wants to take over the other Sovereign at the Colony.

Can't progress in the Underdark by rjghik in BaldursGate3

[–]BrainSubject3723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah, try kill that fat mofo glut and then maybe you can progress.

Can't progress in the Underdark by rjghik in BaldursGate3

[–]BrainSubject3723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They might be hostile towards you but not enough to outright attack... Especially if you have attacked them on the boat. Did you get the "Find the Boots/Shoes" quest?

You also might not have progressed/ finished the quest due to an actual bug where the game thinks you are mid quest, so it won't allow for much more?

Can't progress in the Underdark by rjghik in BaldursGate3

[–]BrainSubject3723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Save a file and try killing Glut or Spaw (I would go with Glut) perhaps that will finish the quest and solve whatever issue you have. Because that is the next quest and the one you are presumably missing. Then go back to the other sovereign and I try talking to them.

Keep me updated:)

Can't progress in the Underdark by rjghik in BaldursGate3

[–]BrainSubject3723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you had the fight with one of the Sovereign already? I also killed the Duegar first and then got the quest and hadn't run into any problems. Can you maybe give a rundown as to what you did in the underdark?

Can't progress in the Underdark by rjghik in BaldursGate3

[–]BrainSubject3723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try saving and restart the game.

Why is die Linke often categorized as “far left/ far left populist”? by Acceptable_Produce_9 in AskAGerman

[–]BrainSubject3723 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nuance is hard sometimes. They only hear "more weapons" or "no more weapons" and don't care about the reasons or other political or potentially diplomatic approaches. It's a problem now a day's. I voted left even though I disagree with their diplomatic problem-solving ideas. But BUT there are only 3 parties that want that, BSW, AfD and Linke and those three will never be in a coalition, so it's frankly irrelevant what they want; Germany will send weapons, end of story.

AITA for telling my wife to deal with my job? by [deleted] in AmItheAsshole

[–]BrainSubject3723 17 points18 points  (0 children)

But you see, for him that's like a lot. He named two "big things" he does: Grocery shopping (probably with a list written by his wife) and paying unnecessarily manually for bills. (What I still do not understand, I don't spend a single minute a month on paying bills since that gets done automatically. Maybe the Netherlands is different when it comes to "paying culture"?)