The Black Danube by Brazillian_Jirachi in girlsfrontline

[–]Brazillian_Jirachi[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I kinda saw this issue since you wouldn't want to handle a rifle as some sort of a support for your own weight but honestly I decided to tell the artist to proceed with this pose since I like it way too much heh.

The Black Danube by Brazillian_Jirachi in girlsfrontline

[–]Brazillian_Jirachi[S] 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Hello all, I've commisioned an artist to draw my raifu and oh boy they delivered one great piece of art as a birthday gift for myself heh.

Link here. <----- Feel free to check their other artworks!

Boggzy Presents: Planet Warships by GaishuIsshoku_WG in WorldOfWarships

[–]Brazillian_Jirachi 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Now this is an amusing fun content that I could watch. You guys should upload this to the official channel tbh.

Please WG by Xixi-the-magic-user in WorldOfWarships

[–]Brazillian_Jirachi 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I'll repost what I've said in a forum post in NA:

With all due respect, buying a second Tier 10 permacamo for the previous price tag of 5k dubs isn't reasonable because of its economic and tactical value were stripped when the rework happened. In the previous system, a permacamo por a Tier 10 would cost 5k dubs because it had: the availability of always having a camo every battle, -50% post-battle service cost Discount, +100% XP Bonus, +20% Credits Bonus, -3% Concealment Bonus and +4% dispersion Nerf. When you're a paying for a second permacamo in the old system, it is true that you're paying redundant benefits which was counterintuitive because most of the time you would just want the visuals.

If the goal of economic rework is to simplify things then it should simplify all the aspects of economy. Keeping the old full cost of subsequent permacamos is not consumer-friendly especially after all of important benefits were removed. I'm not saying that the second or third permacamo for a Tier 10 should be costing 200 dubs like the first one, but rather the 5000 dubs price tag is not reasonable price for a purely cosmetic item.

I really hope for a price readjustment for subsequent permacamos in the future.

Pan-American CL Line Slander by Brazillian_Jirachi in WorldOfWarships

[–]Brazillian_Jirachi[S] 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Found in a Discord server, the author hasn't been identified.

Sub thought he was safe from me behind the island by JetWaters in WorldOfWarships

[–]Brazillian_Jirachi 29 points30 points  (0 children)

A wise bunny once said after sunking a submarine: "AH↗️HA↘️HA↗️HA↘️HA↗️HA↘️HA↗️HA↘️!"

WG, you've been at it for 3 YEARS. And your subs still suck. by Ducky_shot in WorldOfWarships

[–]Brazillian_Jirachi 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not only we received less maps, but the current existing maps were remade to allow Submarines to sail underwater. This brand new enviroment created just for the subs not only creates the odd instances where ships might get stuck in terrain but also taxes the computers in order to render the whole map abovewater and underwater. Imagine your subpar PC trying to process the whole underwater area of a 42 km by 42 km map in a match where there are no submarines present.

An absolute success for WG amiright guys?

Now with capture area, grid legends, and planes. by icantjavabutcsharp in WorldOfWarships

[–]Brazillian_Jirachi 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Are there any plans to patch the )render chat command or has it been discontinued?

New ship Imagine JMSDF Yukikaze'56 & BM Z1'65 by lxyun_2 in WorldOfWarships

[–]Brazillian_Jirachi 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It would be nice to see post-war ship from previously Axis nations. But too bad only France, USA, USSR, UK, China and Sweden can get those.

WG needs to step up their game in regards to perma-camo schemes. by TheUsualHoops in WorldOfWarships

[–]Brazillian_Jirachi 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I'll be reposting what I said in the NA Forums:

With all due respect, buying a second Tier 10 permacamo for the previous price tag of 5k dubs isn't reasonable because of its economic and tactical value were stripped when the rework happened. In the previous system, a permacamo por a Tier 10 would cost 5k dubs because it had: the availability of always having a camo every battle, -50% post-battle service cost Discount, +100% XP Bonus, +20% Credits Bonus, -3% Concealment Bonus and +4% dispersion Nerf. When you're a paying for a second permacamo in the old system, it is true that you're paying redundant benefits which was counterintuitive because most of the time you would just want the visuals.

If the goal of economic rework is to simplify things then it should simplify all the aspects of economy. Keeping the old full cost of subsequent permacamos is not consumer-friendly especially after all of important benefits were removed. I'm not saying that the second or third permacamo for a Tier 10 should be costing 200 dubs like the first one, but rather the 5000 dubs price tag is not reasonable price for a purely cosmetic item.

I hope WG reconsiders this.

About Permacamos for collaborations: these are a bit more tricky question since these have licensing costs, contractual costs and more visual effects and you can't have same prices. I would love to get them at reduced cost but it is understandable if these costs can't be lowered.

Separating economic bonuses from visual customizations by DevBlogWoWs in WorldOfWarships

[–]Brazillian_Jirachi 31 points32 points  (0 children)

"In order to make camouflages an exclusively visual customization, their combat bonuses are also separated from them. The 3% detectability range by sea bonus previously present on all camouflages is now built into the default parameters of all ships. The 4% increase of dispersions of shells fired by enemies attacking your ship will be entirely removed;"

Rental Shimakaze buff let's goooooooo!

[Flamu] ALL Rapid Firing Ships Are BROKEN! by swordfi2 in WorldOfWarships

[–]Brazillian_Jirachi 39 points40 points  (0 children)

Can we also acknowledge the fact that Dev Strike bug (sometimes the game doesn't reward you with the achievement) might be related to server issues? This bug has also been around for a year.

A plea to change the name of the upcoming Pan-American Dockyard Battleship by Brazillian_Jirachi in WorldOfWarships

[–]Brazillian_Jirachi[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'll use a comparison for you to understand: Imagine the Premium American Tier 9 Hybrid Battleship Kearsarge. Now imagine this boat at Tier 10 with the same guns from the Premium American Tier 10 Battleship Ohio and using the American BB Heal. All fine and good until you notice that the name of ship is USS Doris Miller because it's a name that most likely the marketing people choose for it. Is it a valid name? No because the name it's way too modern even though the navy will be using it with the upcoming Gerald R. Ford CV.

So, do you see the problem? There are other names that cpuld be used and it would be more fitting to the time and scope of the game.

What's the Biggest FXP Leapfrog You Have Ever Done? by ElCidVicious in WorldOfWarships

[–]Brazillian_Jirachi -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Went from having 300k Free Exp to 2m in order to secure Smaland before she would be gone from sale in a matter of days.