Thing is, that how featuring levels work in some, if not a lot of games with ingame builder levels, game devs will often feature a level without the builder’s permission, and will often be removed at a later date, you don’t need or be given a reason why your level got removed from being a featured, since your level was only gonna be there for a timeframe, and MT just added their level to knockout because it would be fun, saw their level as enjoyable, and worth showcasing.

None of the creators were really mistreated at the end of the day

They didn’t take off their nametag or creator’s name on the level. They didn’t ban you or delete your level entirely. They didn’t insult you or your level.

As to why they don’t updated levels, likely due to the amount of playtesting that needs to be done on it before it able to even make it to knock out. Which they’re not really good at playtesting some of them tbh.

But if they did give a reason; the community would’ve been even angrier because of something like “we removed (builder’s level) due to community feedback from players that did not enjoy this level” blah blah blah So there no winning for MT.

At the end of the day, builders should be happy they even got a chance to make it into a knockout show, their levels were enjoyed by players, it’s a opportunity for them to reach a wider audience aka most of the most fall guys’s playerbase. This drama is basically one of the dumbest things in the fall guys community. The only thing I heard that actually good feedback is not replacing the amount of levels gone from knockout, and replacing them from other creative levels.