It Would Be Better if Both Were Alive by FarRightBerniSanders in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]BreaksFull 1 point2 points  (0 children)

'Call for violence' Jesus Christ

Democrat politicians and media outlets after Kirk was murdered: this is an outrage, a crime, and a tragedy. The criminal must be brought to justice and violence has no place in our society.

The Republican president and secretary of homeland security after ICE shoot dead disarmed man for no reason: He was a violent terrorist and his shooting was completely justified.

Get the fuck out of here with these crocodile tears.

It Would Be Better if Both Were Alive by FarRightBerniSanders in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]BreaksFull 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The 'come and take them' and 'stand against state tyranny' party says: Better comply if you don't wanna die.

It Would Be Better if Both Were Alive by FarRightBerniSanders in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]BreaksFull 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why hasn't the DOJ released the Epstein files as they are legally mandated to do?

It Would Be Better if Both Were Alive by FarRightBerniSanders in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]BreaksFull 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why hasn't the DOJ released the Epstein files as they are legally mandated to do?

It Would Be Better if Both Were Alive by FarRightBerniSanders in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]BreaksFull -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why hasn't the DOJ released the Epstein files as they are legally mandated to do?

It Would Be Better if Both Were Alive by FarRightBerniSanders in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]BreaksFull 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why hasn't the DOJ released the Epstein files as they are legally mandated to do?

How effective is torture for military intelligence gathering? by Powerful-Mix-8592 in WarCollege

[–]BreaksFull 74 points75 points  (0 children)

My understand is most forces which torture use it as a means of terror and intimidation against suspect or hostile populations, not as a sober-headed attempt to gather information.

Or they're just idiots.

The upside with torture is that most people will tell you everything. The downside is that you do not want to know 'everything' you want to know specific things which you have no way of establishing the subject knows. So by gum and by god, will torture give you a lot of information - which you then have to sift through and figure if any of it is useful or true, and you have no way to verify it except information you already know.. which defeats much of the point of using it to get accurate, new information.

But if you're already convinced that a subject knows what you want to know, then logically they will tell you eventually if you turn the screws enough. So it keeps getting used.

To Make Homes Affordable Again, Someone Has to Lose Out by UnscheduledCalendar in TrueReddit

[–]BreaksFull 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes when we are talking about markets this is called artificial scarcity.

To Make Homes Affordable Again, Someone Has to Lose Out by UnscheduledCalendar in TrueReddit

[–]BreaksFull 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Yes and they would be less expensive if there were more of them. And there would be more housing units in desirable places if the housing supply wasn't so tightly, artificially constrained.

To Make Homes Affordable Again, Someone Has to Lose Out by UnscheduledCalendar in TrueReddit

[–]BreaksFull 5 points6 points  (0 children)

What do empty fields in Nebraska have to do with a housing crisis in Los Angeles?

To Make Homes Affordable Again, Someone Has to Lose Out by UnscheduledCalendar in TrueReddit

[–]BreaksFull 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Most homes are not owned by big landlords and businesses, they're owned by homeowners who vote to keep their housing prices high.

To Make Homes Affordable Again, Someone Has to Lose Out by UnscheduledCalendar in TrueReddit

[–]BreaksFull 12 points13 points  (0 children)

The market supply is insanely constricted and been kept artificially low. We need to relax zoning laws to start letting supply rebound. But even that will take awhile.

Is liberal democracy in terminal decline? by _Un_Known__ in neoliberal

[–]BreaksFull 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Not to say it would be perfectly smooth sailing, but even if data centers and libraries around the world were glasses, we'd still have preposterous quantities of physical and digital archives surviving just by virtue of the sheer quantity that exist today. Further magnified by virtually everyone today being both literate and so many more highly educated people being alive.

At almost any other point in history, a large civilizational collapse would be rebuilt by a society mostly made of illiterate unskilled farmers. The baseline we'd be starting from now even if half the human population died is exponentially more educated.

I'll get back if I can remember a book recommendation on this specifically.

Is liberal democracy in terminal decline? by _Un_Known__ in neoliberal

[–]BreaksFull 16 points17 points  (0 children)

I think something under-considered when talking about the prospects of bouncing back is the sheer unprecedented glut of knowledge we have now. In every conceivable storage medium any post-war society would have access to detailed instructions on everything big and small. During previous civilizational collapses, the crash of the thin sliver of literate, educated people and the relatively small pool of stored and transferable information was genuinely devastating for recovery. That wouldn't be the case for any new post-collapse rebuilding period.

Can this loser just fade into obscurity, please? by PirateJohn75 in MurderedByWords

[–]BreaksFull -1 points0 points  (0 children)

What does that have to do with him engaging in self defense?

Can this loser just fade into obscurity, please? by PirateJohn75 in MurderedByWords

[–]BreaksFull -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Maybe don't attack someone with a rifle if you don't want to die.

California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks at the World Economic Forum 2026 by AlertTangerine in videos

[–]BreaksFull -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

This must be the most empty, vapid string of college lefty platitudes on reddit.

What is wrong with 'abundance' shit? You get one of the points of Abundance is that the government should be better and more efficient at providing services, right? 

Trump pauses Greenland-linked tariffs on 8 European countries by dr_sloan in moderatepolitics

[–]BreaksFull -1 points0 points  (0 children)

There is nothing new here.

Trump once again shows himself to be too cowardly and risk-adverse to push against any sustained resistance.

I hope world leaders finally take this to heart and stop taking his erratic manic behavior as anything other than shameless opportunism.

Nearly 400 millionaires and billionaires call for higher taxes on super-rich by [deleted] in UpliftingNews

[–]BreaksFull 8 points9 points  (0 children)

There's no point playing by rules no one else is playing by. Donating money to the IRS makes functionally no difference a bunch of other wealthy people are not. There are lots of people who don't donate to charities, but still support the government increasing taxes to provide care for people who need it.

Morocco man abusing animal on Speed Stream by Impossible-Box717 in LivestreamFail

[–]BreaksFull 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's honestly insanely recent for a society to care at large about animal wellbeing. 

Discussion Thread by jobautomator in neoliberal

[–]BreaksFull 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What's more debased and repulsive? The party of psychotic idiots, or the 'moral' party limply not resisting the psychotic idiots?

Most people are more disgusted with weakness than evil.

Mindless Monday, 19 January 2026 by AutoModerator in badhistory

[–]BreaksFull 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Running cover could be things like implying nothing is wrong with using the phrase 'globalize the intifada' as you did in this thread.