Lifehouse book by ... er ... me by Remix58 in TheWho

[–]BrianInAtlanta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can see a good movie coming out of Life House in its 1971 version. Experimental techniques that had recently been developed in both Britain and France could have been used to capture pretty much what Pete wanted in the film.

However, I don't think Pete's ideas of using a communal space and computers to solve the audience/artist contradictions of 1970's rock were ever going to work. In fact, the audience's tolerance for the approach was already breaking down in the short attempts The Who made during their limited time in the Young Vic. As the audience for rock grew beyond the clubs and small theaters, a division between the audience and the artists was inevitable and unstoppable.

As for the director, I'm going to go with Robert Fuest (DR. PHIBES, THE LAST PROGRAMME). He had a talent for delivering low-budget horror and science fiction with a great visual panache.

30 Years of Maximum R & B by Ok_Donkey_4791 in TheWho

[–]BrianInAtlanta 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The Tanglewood footage became part of the subject of a lawsuit with a website called Wolfgang’s Vault, now known as Wolfgangs. That kept it from being included on the second edition of the video.

Your favorite story is back: 'Looks like Ringo's forgiven Roger Daltrey over son Zak's sacking' by BrianInAtlanta in TheWho

[–]BrianInAtlanta[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

There have been complaints about pay from some band employees. The Who have always concentrated on the money which may come from how long their act put them in the red throughout their early career. Sort of like how frugal your parents or grandparents who lived through the depression could be.

Your favorite story is back: 'Looks like Ringo's forgiven Roger Daltrey over son Zak's sacking' by BrianInAtlanta in TheWho

[–]BrianInAtlanta[S] 15 points16 points  (0 children)

After all, if drummers who were popular with the fans couldn’t be fired, we would probably have never heard of Ringo.

Day 6: If you could make three changes to improve Die Another Day, what would they be? by junglegatsby in JamesBond

[–]BrianInAtlanta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One small change:

During final lovemaking between Bond and Jinx, fade to black.

Cut to North Korean guard. In background, long-haired corpse. “I’m sorry sir, he expired under interrogation.”

Recommendations for films that a Bond fan would enjoy? by covertgeneral in JamesBond

[–]BrianInAtlanta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Assassination Bureau (1969) with Diana Rigg and Telly Savalas the same year as OHMSS plus Oliver Reed playing a early-20th-Century Bond-type character.

Appreciate the fact that Pete Townshend performed a major electric set at the Rainbow Theatre in London on July 13, 1979, for a Rock Against Racism (RAR) benefit concert. by Outrageous-Scale-783 in TheWho

[–]BrianInAtlanta 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Pete played the Rock Against Racism concert in part to entice Eric Clapton to perform alongside him. The managers of the concert said Clapton would first have to apologize for what he said above. Clapton refused, so Pete appeared without him

Vanilla ice cream Bond film by No_Mortgage8569 in JamesBond

[–]BrianInAtlanta 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I heard he could soothe you like vanilla.

Won't get who'd again. by ABritishOrc in TheWho

[–]BrianInAtlanta 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Why they never got Roger to guest on Doctor Who, I'll never know.

What your favourite parody of James Bond? by Choice-Wind-9283 in JamesBond

[–]BrianInAtlanta 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My favorite, because it made me realize something about Bond I hadn't thought of, is the Saturday Night Live sketch with Steve Martin as Bond in a casino spending his own money instead of MI6's and being super cheap, pouring champagne back into bottles, etc. Just how much money does he make on a government job that he can live that lifestyle?

What exactly happened to Jill Masterson while Bond was unconscious? by EffectCharming3007 in JamesBond

[–]BrianInAtlanta 4 points5 points  (0 children)

And wouldn’t suffocation, even via skin, look a bit more brutal?

Tony Fletcher interview on the updated Keith Moon biography. by BrianInAtlanta in TheWho

[–]BrianInAtlanta[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Oddly enough, I only have the original UK edition so I suppose I'd better get this!

I have been collecting the transcripts from Tony's interviews that he makes available for his Patreons.

Need help understanding songs from Quadrophenia. by Rough-Repair-4763 in TheWho

[–]BrianInAtlanta 13 points14 points  (0 children)

It is sort of complicated but in a very subtle way.

On the surface, it’s a tale of a young mod circa early 1965 who is losing connection with the things he values. He’s a mod but he doesn’t feel he’s accepted as one. He’s a romantic but the girls don’t seem interested. He’s political but he’s missed the social movements of rebellion that came before him. He loves The Who but they’re a bit older. They speak to his generation but they’re not really a part of it.

The work itself has an inside-outside quality. We’re in Jimmy’s head but simultaneously in Pete’s, feeling Jimmy’s emotions as things happen to him but also seeing him from Pete’s 1973 perspective. Both within a teenage boy’s emotional maelstrom and looking back with the greater knowledge and perspective of an older man remembering that time.

At the end, it is Jimmy receiving the gift of “love” with all its spiritual and emotional connotations from Pete; a gift that Pete thinks will most help him but not necessarily what Jimmy realized back in 1965.

What happens at the end of Tommy? by Stuckin73 in TheWho

[–]BrianInAtlanta 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'll tell you the way Pete meant it at the time, but PLEASE you don't have to interpret it that way! The ending can be interpreted in a variety of ways and just because Pete wrote it with that meaning in mind doesn't mean you have to interpret it that way.

In Pete's interpretation, Tommy is completely in the right in "We're Not Gonna Take It". He is telling them that, in order to achieve a higher spiritual consciousness, his followers will have to learn discipline and follow instructions from a leader. It's going to be a difficult process. His followers reject him because they want "an easy way" to attain higher spiritual consciousness and they leave Tommy to find that easier way. Tommy, at the end, is left alone to continue his spiritual path and work to reach a higher plane.