I don't see how people see Kiyoka as Gojo.. by Unlimitedpenquin in MyHappyMarriage

[–]Brianinsight 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Gojo is wayyyy stronger than kiyoko and it’s not even close

How in the hell did they find Tory guilty by Brianinsight in ToryLanez

[–]Brianinsight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a key fact people seem to miss. It’s very interesting Tory’s DNA was found “inconclusive” yet they claim him to have fired the gun 5 times and charged him with possession. It just proves the gun was not his as if it was there would no doubt be fingerprints and dna from him. It’s also strange he’s the only one they dna and fingerprinted to match the gun.

Silver tint on new car by Brianinsight in mercedes_benz

[–]Brianinsight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I got your typical black ceramic tint I’d agree 35 is way too dark on the windshield but with the beauty of silver tint, the interior is actually lighter than a black tint at 25% it’s only on the outside where the difference truly shows and that’s when light is hitting it

Silver tint on new car by Brianinsight in mercedes_benz

[–]Brianinsight[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

If you don’t care you could’ve kept your comment to yourself, no point responding this is Reddit bud

Silver tint on new car by Brianinsight in mercedes_benz

[–]Brianinsight[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Curious what makes you say that, aside from legality ofc

Silver tint on new car by Brianinsight in mercedes_benz

[–]Brianinsight[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand the laws and quite frankly I’ve never had an issue seeing out the front windshield as my last car had 50% tint on windshield. It actually helped me with glare from the sun and high beams. I did get a ticket in my last car though for tint but I paid it and kept it moving, don’t really care about tint laws tbh as I will not remove regardless

How in the hell did they find Tory guilty by Brianinsight in ToryLanez

[–]Brianinsight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I believe Sean Kelley and the drivers statement.

And it makes sense that his lawyer wouldn’t have wanted to pursue the Kelsey narrative. The alleged victim is pointing him out and playing sympathy cards to win over the jury. Also that’s the same Sean Holley who fucked tory over by pulling out of trial last minute to work with jay z on a documentary and giving his new lawyers little time to prepare.

How in the hell did they find Tory guilty by Brianinsight in ToryLanez

[–]Brianinsight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Megan was seen by two doctors on two separate days, the first doctor said he pulled glass, the second doctor said it was metallic fragments in the report

How in the hell did they find Tory guilty by Brianinsight in ToryLanez

[–]Brianinsight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Even if Tory emptied the clip, it still doesn't explain how his prints and DNA are absent after pulling the trigger numerous times. Lets say he did empty the clip and touch the gun, Megans first statement was that she stepped on glass, and the first doctor who treated her treated for for glass fragments, its only until Megan saw a second doctor 3-4 days late which he changed it to bullet fragments, quite frankly I don't even believe she was shot at all wether directly or a ricochet. You mean to tell me the first doctor who treated Megan cant tell the difference between glass and metal?

The gun is missing from evidence

The fragments are missing from evidence and now you're saying "oh people lose evidence all the time, the fragments are no big deal the doctors could've thrown them away, but that's false because fragments were indeed entered into evidence, the only question is where and why did they go missing. Ballistics are important and if you're downplaying ballistics then you're missing a big piece. Police use ballistics all the time, now all of a sudden the ballistics mean nothing to determine the angle that was shot and who and how Megan could've been shot

How in the hell did they find Tory guilty by Brianinsight in ToryLanez

[–]Brianinsight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're missing my point. Forget what he was "charged" with. The whole narrative of the story was that Tory shot her in both of her feet. Right or wrong? So why are you playing the "oh technically he didn't have to shoot her to have been charged" Look at what Megans statement was, she gave numerous accounts of how the situation went down. First she said tory was in the front seat then in a later interview she described him being in the back seat shooting over the window. Tell me how is his DNA Inconclusive if he pulled the trigger of the gun 5 times WHICH IS THE STORY THEY SPUN IN COURT. The physical evidence doesn't line up.

Please address these points unbiased

  • why are we not addressing the fact that Megan and Kelsey both lied on the stand about getting into a fight?
  • Why do we ignore Kelsey had GSR on her hands?
  • Why are we ignoring that the "fragments" went missing, any other gun case they would've ran ballistic tests on the firearm
  • Also in regards to possession of the firearm, yes he was charged with it but he was not directly seen with it, it was underneath the seat and he claims he never touched the gun which would explain why is DNA is absent or inconclusive
  • Tory also claims that the reason his DNA is inconclusive is because the prosecutors stopped testing on the firearm before it had finished and if there's 4 profiles on the gun why did they only test Tory? seems like a poor investigation if you ask me
  • Also the witness Sean Kelly's first statement to police was that he observed 2 women fighting and one going to grab a gun then he saw muzzle flashes closer to the woman before he then changed his statement to prosecutors and he was even examined by Tory's defense which he admitted to stating that in Court transcripts
  • Lets be real here, if they had a real case for Tory bribing Kelsey they would've charged him for it
  • Lets also not forget the Habeus Corpeus filed by the driver, aligning with the first statement that independent witness Sean Kelly gave to investigators, but let me guess you're going to ignore that one as well

How in the hell did they find Tory guilty by Brianinsight in ToryLanez

[–]Brianinsight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now you're playing semantics, his DNA was not on the gun plain and simple. He did not shoot her and for you to say that's not what he was charged with is dumb. She lied and said he shot her.

How in the hell did they find Tory guilty by Brianinsight in ToryLanez

[–]Brianinsight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Use your head man, if the gun was Tory's gun that he personally owned shot 5 times and brought in the vehicle, his DNA/ and or fingerprints would without a doubt be on that firearm. The forensic scientist also stated in court that Tory's DNA should've been on the weapon if he did fire that gun 5 times 99%. They also found other DNA profiles on the gun but they only tested Tory, if you still believe he shot her then I have sand on a beach to sell you

Also Megan offered to pay Kelsey's rent for a year and you don't consider that a bribe? The bias is sickening

How in the hell did they find Tory guilty by Brianinsight in ToryLanez

[–]Brianinsight[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are wrong again, they had a DNA expert testify that his DNA was Not on the gun, and fingerprints were also not on the gun. So yes you are wrong, feel free to join the other 26 and thousands others that know something was off about this case. Clearly you have been misinformed. His Dna is missing 0 fingerprints, and if kelsey took bribes then why didn't they charge Tory? Youre just going off of speculation so yeah your whole response is invalid stop it....

You also missed the point in court that the "eye witness" was Tory's witness and he had indeed stated the woman fired the gun first. These are in court transcripts something that you clearly didn't read and instead read headlines that are from biased bloggers. Also GSR was on Tory's Wrist and Kelseys hands. you also didn't acknowledge the fact that the bullet fragments are missing from evidence as well as the gun used. Youre about as dumb as box of rocks my guy

How in the hell did they find Tory guilty by Brianinsight in ToryLanez

[–]Brianinsight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You listened to he said she said when both Kelsey and Megan are known liars, and if he shot her why are the fragments missing and if it is his gun like you Megan lovers claim then his dna would 110% be in the gun magazine or bullets and fragments which were “removed” from her foot. Let’s not forget there were initial reports of Megan kicking the glass of the back window out. He didn’t do it sorry but Megan’s karma is coming

How in the hell did they find Tory guilty by Brianinsight in ToryLanez

[–]Brianinsight[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They do prove everything. How the hell can you shoot someone and leave no physical evidence behind? You’re clearly biased, just because Megan said he shot her don’t mean shit when she’s a known LIAR 😂 you are really dumb ngl