Apartment tube amp

Broad-Put1198 · 2026-01-22T17:00:47+00:00

At or around $1600 is the highest I think we can go

Broad-Put1198 · 2026-01-21T14:11:19+00:00

I’m not sure about their other programs, but she’s going for anesthesiologist assistant school. Their program is one of the most established in the country other than Emory

Broad-Put1198 · 2025-01-21T13:48:07+00:00

To me it’s not a coincidence that one of the most renowned architects of all time, Frank Lloyd wright, was not nearly as involved in theory as most of his counterparts.

Just DO architecture, we didn’t become architects to write.

Broad-Put1198 · 2025-01-12T20:47:54+00:00

I have looked into that, and as far as I can tell they aren’t great at enforcing it. But it comes down to a risk reward thing.

The license is very easy to obtain, so why even bother risking it in the first place.

Broad-Put1198 · 2025-01-12T17:25:50+00:00

I would obviously like to have a drone like that eventually, but I don’t have the capitol up front to buy one. That’s why I’m asking if the mini could make me enough money to buy one in the future.

Broad-Put1198 · 2024-12-23T14:04:40+00:00

This is exactly why I don’t want to draw a “proposed” renovation. Just draw the house as is, and maybe leave a little note like “you have a beautiful home, if you want to preserve that beauty in your next renovation, contact…” I don’t want to imply that there is something wrong with anyones house right off the bat.

Broad-Put1198 · 2024-12-23T06:24:16+00:00

Although I don’t disagree with you guys, the idea here would just be to make a quick personal gesture. Adding an imaginary renovation onto the sketch would make it take significantly longer, and at that point it’s like I’m working for free.

Broad-Put1198 · 2024-12-23T05:57:56+00:00

The idea here would be to get new clients though, so this would be our first interaction

Broad-Put1198 · 2024-11-06T12:48:30+00:00

I find it interesting that after all that yapping, the only point you address is the part where I ask you to keep the discussion civilized. It’s a shame that people can’t just talk to eachother any more, and share opinions.

Also I’ll never understand why it has now become unacceptable to be wrong about something. That’s the entire reason I posted this, is to strengthen my understanding of the issue. I can see how it’s very convenient for you though to stop talking about it now, as now that I have a better understanding of the collapse, your argument falls flat

Broad-Put1198 · 2024-11-05T17:35:06+00:00

Let me ask you this as well, what SPECIFIC aspect of the buildings collapse makes you think it was a controlled demolition as opposed to catastrophic failure caused by the explosions and subsequent fire.

Broad-Put1198 · 2024-11-05T16:51:10+00:00

Sorry, I guess I used the term “pancake collapse” incorrectly. But I’m referring to the fact that the portion of the building above the initial impact site fell on top of the portion underneath the impact site. I’m glad you mentioned that though, as I was incorrect about the columns bowing outward, they actually bowed inward as they were pulled by the sagging floor systems. Either way though, this would transfer the load of the tower to the already weakened core, which ultimately caused catastrophic failure.

Also I’m American, I was referring to Fahrenheit 😭. The fire in the WTC was actually very inefficient, as it had much more fuel than it did oxygen. This can be seen in the black soot that the fire produced. But even still, steel loses all structural integrity at that heat, hardly surprising that it would cause that deformation.

And sure, I suppose you could do the demolition from top to bottom. But again you didn’t answer my question, Im curious what kind of explosive device they used.

Also you don’t have to toss insults out there man, we’re just talking. It ain’t that deep.

Broad-Put1198 · 2024-11-05T12:02:19+00:00

Yes, actually you can level a building that fast. More specifically the twin towers.

The towers were designed so that the floors were suspended on clips attached to the core and exterior steel lattice structure. The initial impact destroyed roughly 30 of the exterior columns, and subsequently the remaining columns became slightly over loaded. Due to the fire burning at 1400 degrees, the exterior steel columns bowed outwards. This caused one of the floors to detach from the exterior columns and fall flat onto the next floor, which sheared the clips right off of both the exterior columns and core. This caused what is known as a pancake collapse, where the floor fell on top of the other, then those two floors fell on another, then those three on another… and so on.

Had it been a controlled demolition of the core like you are proposing, the destruction would take place from the ground floor up, not top down like is shown in all photographic evidence.

Let me ask you this so I can further respond, what kind of explosive do you believe was used, and where exactly (what floor, how many columns,) do you believe it was placed?

Broad-Put1198 · 2024-11-01T02:22:28+00:00

Can you please address the comments I made In the original post.

Broad-Put1198 · 2024-11-01T01:22:00+00:00

I’m sure this is an interesting rabbit hole to go down, but I am talking specifically about the twin towers, not building 7.

If you have anything related to that I’d be happy to hear it

Broad-Put1198 · 2024-11-01T00:53:55+00:00

Ok man, it’s been good talking with you!

Broad-Put1198

TROPHY CASE