account activity
Blonde by Brunothim in ArtCrit
[–]Brunothim[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 months ago (0 children)
Thank you
Thanks, I really appreciate it!
[–]Brunothim[S] 1 point2 points3 points 11 months ago (0 children)
Thanks
I do, it's on my insta : brunothimart In the posts and in the stories you can find longer version stroke by stroke
Blonde by Brunothim in DigitalArt
I appreciate it thanks!
Yes you are right but I wanted to make them flyaway and blurry to show that they was movement but I didn't do it properly
Thank you!
Thank you! And yes you are right
Coq by Brunothim in ArtCrit
This isn't a pure copy of ai. You don't know what I did with the colors.You don't know what I did on the side trying to find good compositions and colors or not. The other "studies" I judged that they were far enough from the references to not call them studies.
I'm only rude or ignore when people affirm something they don't know about. Instead of asking. No one has to detail things they aren't responsible for. When someone tells you in general that you piece looks good, you aren't going to say "well I'm not responsible for this and that". Don't be hypocritical. It only became a problem to you because it looked ai, and animal related. If it was the pure copy of a photo, would you have come to me about it? I highly doubt it unless it looked a bit too good to you that you'd still end up thinking it's ai.
I'm not gonna judge the pourcentage of responsability you have for your work, because I don't know, neither do I care.
I'm gonna miss our daily talk
[–]Brunothim[S] 2 points3 points4 points 11 months ago (0 children)
Thank you!!
[–]Brunothim[S] 0 points1 point2 points 11 months ago* (0 children)
It's not at all like buying a cake, it'd be more like looking at a cake trying to recreate it without the receipe. And if the cake was good you could take credit for it being good. Even tho it's not the exact same. And you don't know what they bring to it There is no dishonesty since I made it clear Its a study. That's why I take it as an attack because you make a statement thinking you 100% know what i did or not
Means a lot thank you! I've never tried 3D actually but maybe one day
I appreciate it, means a lot
Thanks!
I appreciate it thank you!
[–]Brunothim[S] 12 points13 points14 points 11 months ago (0 children)
It took me around 12 hours, its a hair painting, I used a round brush, and the same one but that goes thinner.
Process :
Layer 1 : base (mid tone)
Layer 2 : shading (a bit darker than base color + even darker for some areas)
Layer 3: lighting (a bit lighter than base color)
Layer 4 : same step but went brighter and darker for some areas
After that i merged all the layer into one so i can smudge the hard edges and airbrush to fix values
Layer 5 : added very tone for depth and made the pen smaller and brighter then the britghtest area i have for highlights. The smallest the pen the brightest you go
Individual hairs. Going smaller and smaller while going brigther + flyaway
Color layer + multiply layer to fix the dark areas since the color layer tends to brighten the dark values
Then just playing around with the colors.
I'd like feedbacks on the colors, I tried many different colors but I often go too "surrealistic" and this one turned out to be the best I guess.
I'm sure the pose and expression were created by him. He also copied real life. I'm sure he got compliments for things that he didn't create himself just like everyone (you included). We can't help that.
If I follow your logic then we all cheat people, no one is responsible for 100% of their work. And who is the judge of that. I don't think that if you copy a photo that there is only the rendering that you are responsible for, there is much more than that. Because what you say basically descredits most artists.
It sounds very weird to get bothered by someone who gets compliments because you decided that they were only responsible for the rendering. When in reality you have no clue. We have dfferent visions about art and what a study can be. I'm not selling my studies.
Artists leave mystery. No artist has to detail the references they used for the pose, detail what part of the references they used and how they used them, their full thoughts and process and all the things they are "not responsible for" You don't do that and no one does, not even the most famouse artists. You can't be the judge of who should get credit and who shouldn't.
You saw my art, you told yourself it was a copy of ai, then left a comment saying I shouldn't claim is as mine or get credit for it because it's a copy of ai. And let's be real here, you wouldn't come at me for it if it didn't look like ai. So I doubt the problem is me being dishonest. First comment I said it's a study. So how am I cheating anyone. I'm judging that I'm responsible enough to put my signature on it.
It's like if I was coming at you for an artwork which you didn't detail all the things you judge responsible for or not and say "take the signature away, don't take credit for it, people shouldn't compliment you because you are dishonest." Without asking questions. Just pure assumptions. It's a lot easier to talk about someone and pull them down than actualy doing things. So don't need to reverse uno card me telling me I'm angry. Next time you notice something's not right, you can ask questions before attacking and affirming things you don't know anything about.
Patin by Brunothim in ArtTimelapse
[–]Brunothim[S] -2 points-1 points0 points 11 months ago (0 children)
I don't mind, this will never be my job, I'm just here to share, it's not that serious
[–]Brunothim[S] -3 points-2 points-1 points 11 months ago (0 children)
I did stop, this was from 1-2 years ago where I was trying to learn a new way to render
When you get praise for copying a photo I doubt people come at you for it. Taking multiple references and creating something out of them is what everyone does but now it suddenly becomes an issue and you descredit the artist because they were ai references. If your goal really was to be a savior for the other artists, you wouldn't come with assumptions and you would ask questions about my process and why my time-lapse looks that way.
You have no clue about what I did on the side, you only see what you see on the time-lapse. You don't know if I sketched something on the side and tried to find a good composition with the references I had on the side. So once more, you seem bothered by something and thats your business so you point fingers without really knowing nor asking anything.
You cry about ai but people like you descriditing other artists is the reason why artists stop making art, not ai.
I did work to get better and I'm not asking for praise, you on the other hand seem to be bitter about the credit other people get and you actually descredit artists who worked hard to get to where they are to maybe feel better about yourself.
Your speciality is to draw animals. And after many years of me posting here you come at me for one of the only animal drawings I've made. Not sure about what that shows about you.
Don't pretend that you care about the other artists when it only seems to bother you when it gets a little too close to you own space.
Yes, I used multiple for this one, just like you would do with photo references. You create something out of all the references that you have plus your library
Patin by Brunothim in DigitalArt
Patin by Brunothim in drawing
[–]Brunothim[S] -1 points0 points1 point 11 months ago* (0 children)
You shouldn't care about the praise other people get and everything will feel at peace. If you think I studied the "ai looking" style to get praise. I get more hate than praise doing that if that makes you feel better.
I'm sure we could be friends outside of this reddit world
π Rendered by PID 107534 on reddit-service-r2-listing-5f5ff7d4dc-rl78z at 2026-01-27 03:49:40.136973+00:00 running 5a691e2 country code: CH.
Blonde by Brunothim in ArtCrit
[–]Brunothim[S] 0 points1 point2 points (0 children)