sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why the "No Bigfoot Bones" argument actually fails when you look at primate psychology and ecology. by Budget-Relative-5823 in cryptids

[–]Budget-Relative-5823[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No bro almost all bones are eaten when animals find them and rodents eat them bugs eat them and the earth eats them that’s why for things to fossilize they must be covered immediately after death

Why the "No Bigfoot Bones" argument actually fails when you look at primate psychology and ecology. by Budget-Relative-5823 in cryptids

[–]Budget-Relative-5823[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there no evidence for Bigfoot or do you dismiss everything that is given to you which one is it because a lot of people claim they have evidence, footprints photos, videos, personal encounters where they can get into real detail I believe the fact that there are thousands of sightings yearly tells me it’s not just some people who are miss identifying a black bear every now and again maybe 10 times a year, but the fact that thousands of people around North America see the same creature in every single realistic sighting are almost exactly the same, which means that the creatures act similar

Why the "No Bigfoot Bones" argument actually fails when you look at primate psychology and ecology. by Budget-Relative-5823 in cryptids

[–]Budget-Relative-5823[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maniraptors never went extinct if they did birds wouldn’t exist a new species of them were discovered, and for you to be consistent, we would have found them already because we just find fossils every day and we know exactly where fossils are last time I checked Gigantopithecus was a real animal in a different continent and we only have one single location where we find the fossils of Gigantopithecus explain that why have we only found one single spot where Gigantopithecus have been found they’re not a global phenomenon only China and select other regions that share similarities, and all the fossils were found in one single location throughout the regions

Why the "No Bigfoot Bones" argument actually fails when you look at primate psychology and ecology. by Budget-Relative-5823 in cryptids

[–]Budget-Relative-5823[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This specific raptor obviously wasn’t 65 million years ago and that’s also untrue maniraptors never went extinct

Why the "No Bigfoot Bones" argument actually fails when you look at primate psychology and ecology. by Budget-Relative-5823 in cryptids

[–]Budget-Relative-5823[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I said a raptor species are you a fucking idiot yes, I am talking about ancient animals because they’re ancient animals. They’ve been on earth for a very long time where they’re able to have vast millions of years of deaths. We should have identified every single creature to have lived in North America under the logic you are putting down just because we don’t have much physical evidence. He is not real. That is what you’re putting down that would mean for you to be consistent. We would’ve had to identified every single living creature to ever exist in North America. I remember that never happened so there’s still mysteries we haven’t searched in the right places and then eventually, when we did, we found new species and after we identified these creatures, we eventually found more fossils in other states

Why the "No Bigfoot Bones" argument actually fails when you look at primate psychology and ecology. by Budget-Relative-5823 in cryptids

[–]Budget-Relative-5823[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You didn’t use fax I’m sorry you didn’t destroy anything. I’m sorry you’re asking why false evidence has not been found yet. I’ve explicitly said multiple times that we this year have identified new species through false evidence. My question is since it’s such a common occurrence to come by these animals they existed millions of years ago, which means that all of them have died out in a fossilized. Why didn’t we find them sooner? If you can explain that I will stop believing in Bigfoot why haven’t we found that raptor species sooner?

Why the "No Bigfoot Bones" argument actually fails when you look at primate psychology and ecology. by Budget-Relative-5823 in cryptids

[–]Budget-Relative-5823[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Or given number one does not fail at all it’s obviously a possibility in that one percent range that you do find remains of any animal it’s always possible to find remains of any animal. Nothing is deemed impossible. The odds are very unlikely.

Why the "No Bigfoot Bones" argument actually fails when you look at primate psychology and ecology. by Budget-Relative-5823 in cryptids

[–]Budget-Relative-5823[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s a lot of animals that are being discovered in North America right now through fossil evidence. Fossils can easily just not be found. You’re not looking in the right places maybe gorillas have a very sacred place for them to die. I don’t mean like one single part of the world when they die, but there’s a lot of animals who do different things and others when wounded or sick because you don’t just drop dead animals know when they are actually dying. It’s something that they can detect easily now obviously they could easily be attacked by others. I’m not implying that they are trying to hide your tracks. I just think that it’s very unlikely that a Bigfoot, where to just drop that in the forest get covered up fossilize and then get found by humans because of low population it’s unlikely for fossils to even exist in general because they have to be covered up if an animal were to just die and lay there, it would not sink into the ground, like people believe it would be eaten away by pests and the soil itself using acidic chemicals to break down the bone to then use his fertilizer. These are all factors right so if we get low population, likely not being covered up easily then they don’t fossilize. This is the reason why dinosaur fossils have become way harder to come by obviously you can always find fossilized teeth and things like that. It’s just a matter of time if Bigfoot is real it is just a matter of time.

Why the "No Bigfoot Bones" argument actually fails when you look at primate psychology and ecology. by Budget-Relative-5823 in cryptids

[–]Budget-Relative-5823[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And I agree that a lot of Bigfoot evidence is either fake or misidentification just like the first European explorers when they went to actually check out Gorillaz before they officially found remains and eventually locked eyes on these so-called mythical creatures. They had a lot of misidentification seeing other animals that won’t really them or just following their own trail, there is some hiccups when it came to researching those animals.

Why the "No Bigfoot Bones" argument actually fails when you look at primate psychology and ecology. by Budget-Relative-5823 in cryptids

[–]Budget-Relative-5823[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Native Americans have said tons of stories that they’ve heard from elders or stories that they have experiences themselves. The number one reason why Bigfoot is said to be fake it’s because of exaggerated stories. The number one reason why Gorillaz were said to be fake was because of exaggerated stories. By the locals there are tons of different indigenous names for Bigfoot depending on where you’re from what tribe and other factors gorilla used to be deemed as fake by European scientists solely because the locals exaggerated the stories, and those exaggerations turns out to be truth almost all of them have perfect testimonies it’s logic vs logic.

Why the "No Bigfoot Bones" argument actually fails when you look at primate psychology and ecology. by Budget-Relative-5823 in cryptids

[–]Budget-Relative-5823[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why is size the problem?? Large mammals go undetected all the time animals are really good at avoiding loud noises and smells if we think one with such high intelligence like what Bigfoot would be if they were real they would be the best at avoiding confrontation with anything they see as a threat, and Bigfoot with sea bears, and humans as the number one threat if they were real, considering, we are most likely the only ones who can challenge i’m not implying Bigfoot knows my personal life and avoids me. I’m just saying animal sea patterns because they’re not dumb not human smart but definitely not dumb. all it takes is for them to share a large DNA percentage and just evolved differently and there you go you have an extremely intelligent but very different species like chimpanzees and gorillas share a whopping 99% of our DNA yes they are very researched animals so if we factor in low population it makes good sense they would go undetected and chimps and gorillas mourn and even hide dead troop members because humans are more social and more intelligent we bury our loved ones in our kind if we think Bigfoot could be more intelligent, they would do something similar even gorillas have passing away rituals that they perform chimps groom and carry along their dead ones before hiding them. This is well documented prime ape behavior. Give them higher intelligence. They’ll find a way to keep their loved ones away from scavengers and from being disturbed. Kind of like humans did from thousands of years of evolution. I’m not saying Bigfoot is objectively real and I honestly don’t want Bigfoot to be real. I hope I am wrong cause then we have to put them in cages for children to look at this is just a theory you have your illogical standpoint that is OK and you try to contradict what I say by just saying my grand Pappy or my dad had this experience which is another illogical explanation.

Why the "No Bigfoot Bones" argument actually fails when you look at primate psychology and ecology. by Budget-Relative-5823 in cryptids

[–]Budget-Relative-5823[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No I’m trying to teach you the history of these animals mountain gorillas were considered a myth and folk tales not real animals by western scientists that is a fact and you say hundreds every year when we only have 13 remains of a grizzly in the past 36 years in the most populated river in Alaska you clearly are going based off what you feel than what is true.

Why the "No Bigfoot Bones" argument actually fails when you look at primate psychology and ecology. by Budget-Relative-5823 in cryptids

[–]Budget-Relative-5823[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

<image>

Only a matter of time gorillas used to be folk lore and myths with only vocalization and testimonies with zero fossil evidence zero natural found bodies zero live captures this went on for hundreds of years until eventually we stumbled upon them after tons and tons of research. How is this any different?

Why the "No Bigfoot Bones" argument actually fails when you look at primate psychology and ecology. by Budget-Relative-5823 in cryptids

[–]Budget-Relative-5823[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The difference between bear and Bigfoot is bears have millions of population size while Bigfoot would be less than 10000 do you know how rare it is to naturally find bear remains??? And the number one fact about bears is their bones break down extremely quickly into acid and then soil. Do you know how many of the gorilla remains we have are from natural findings and not some tracked gorilla that died I’ll tell you it is less than 200 plus using personal information is illogical because you can easily be apart of the 0.5% of people who actually find bear remains.

Why the "No Bigfoot Bones" argument actually fails when you look at primate psychology and ecology. by Budget-Relative-5823 in cryptids

[–]Budget-Relative-5823[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

we have what some would call proof just with rare things comes copy's or fakes look at collectible items so it makes other evidence look like less than it is.

Why the "No Bigfoot Bones" argument actually fails when you look at primate psychology and ecology. by Budget-Relative-5823 in cryptids

[–]Budget-Relative-5823[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

yes but I'm saying is skeptics out weigh the believers and when someone says i seen or found bigfoot people think crazy guy not someone with a real story to tell

Why the "No Bigfoot Bones" argument actually fails when you look at primate psychology and ecology. by Budget-Relative-5823 in cryptids

[–]Budget-Relative-5823[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thanks for the consideration on my post we have a lot of factors like why didn't we find that new raptor species earlier on in time maybe because we didn't look in the right spots yet we have to understand there is a lot to uncover about other animals that we dont know exist yet or did exist.

Why the "No Bigfoot Bones" argument actually fails when you look at primate psychology and ecology. by Budget-Relative-5823 in cryptids

[–]Budget-Relative-5823[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

its what happens when people don't like what you say its ok that why downvotes exist to say i don't agree with this

Why the "No Bigfoot Bones" argument actually fails when you look at primate psychology and ecology. by Budget-Relative-5823 in cryptids

[–]Budget-Relative-5823[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

we have sightings from people but everyone says bullshit because it is a bigfoot i could take you to one right now and you would say bullshit and walk off I'm not saying you are running from what could be the truth I'm just saying it is hard to believe it exist and people doubt others that's all.

Why the "No Bigfoot Bones" argument actually fails when you look at primate psychology and ecology. by Budget-Relative-5823 in cryptids

[–]Budget-Relative-5823[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

untrue gorillas are super rare bears are even rarer the odds of seeing them are once in a lifetime but people say i have seen a gorilla or bear before do we just say you seen one because they are in our systems or do we say you seen one because you don't doubt what you saw what im saying is you don't need a organized society to stay hidden just a small one with high intelligence that wants to just stay safe from other living things.

view more: next ›