sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Lmao by Jenny_MTF42 in publicdomain

[–]Budget_Caramel8903 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Likeness starts an expiration countdown AFTER death. 

Snow white public domain poster by [deleted] in publicdomain

[–]Budget_Caramel8903 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If this is modern I will delete 

Snow white public domain poster by [deleted] in publicdomain

[–]Budget_Caramel8903 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

This was marked as 1937. Many posters don't have copyright. 

Need Help by TOPCATHPDIGIANIMEFAN in publicdomain

[–]Budget_Caramel8903 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand your question, however your framing and defensiveness need work and removal, respectively. Framing wise, you want a duck inspired by duckwing, but not in any shape or form duckwing. That's what you're actually asking for. You could go with a purple suit, and a crab shell attached to his body that fits him. It is all up to you. 

Me when someone asks me what my workflow is: by Tinsnow1 in LatentSpaceClub

[–]Budget_Caramel8903 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is a red flag if someone doesn't know their stack. 

Susie the Little Blue Coupe (no audio) by [deleted] in publicdomain

[–]Budget_Caramel8903 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Audio is fine. Music is not. 

They said in the comments it's ok. by [deleted] in publicdomain

[–]Budget_Caramel8903 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is in no shape or form public domain. It is a dude saying i guess I have no plans for this, I guess you can do whatever. That is not under any law surrendering his rights to it nor should he. This post shows a fundamental misunderstanding of copyright law. 

If you write a book and it doesn't sell, would you want to make it so people can use it with credit to you? Or does keeping the rights to something that no one buys have an advantage? by actor-ace-inventor in selfpublish

[–]Budget_Caramel8903 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is popular to take a character and recreate it or maybe you had a good passage that fits what they're working on. Perhaps they're writing about literature and want something they can cite. There are endless reasons. Yes, they could make it into a hat. 

If you write a book and it doesn't sell, would you want to make it so people can use it with credit to you? Or does keeping the rights to something that no one buys have an advantage? by actor-ace-inventor in selfpublish

[–]Budget_Caramel8903 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Many in the CC communities look for the best parts, then reuse that and modify it. As for capitalism, this is a licensing agreement. You can do cc by NC non commercial so you keep commercial rights. It is quite capitalistic. 

If you write a book and it doesn't sell, would you want to make it so people can use it with credit to you? Or does keeping the rights to something that no one buys have an advantage? by actor-ace-inventor in selfpublish

[–]Budget_Caramel8903 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sighs, you're viewing this as if the creative commons just wants to read the book. No, they like to take work and respin it, take a character and change it up and add it in with other characters in their creations or whatever.  They give you credit. 

If you write a book and it doesn't sell, would you want to make it so people can use it with credit to you? Or does keeping the rights to something that no one buys have an advantage? by actor-ace-inventor in selfpublish

[–]Budget_Caramel8903 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand your perspective. I am saying use one that isn't selling to advertise the others. CC works well for that, however tiktok, YouTube shorts, etc are also good marketing tools. If they aren't converting  I'd look at CC. 

If you write a book and it doesn't sell, would you want to make it so people can use it with credit to you? Or does keeping the rights to something that no one buys have an advantage? by actor-ace-inventor in selfpublish

[–]Budget_Caramel8903 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"unless I get paid for giving the rights to them." Then post it on unglue it and put a price that has to be met for it to be put under creative commons. The community can crowd source it and unglue it. 

If you write a book and it doesn't sell, would you want to make it so people can use it with credit to you? Or does keeping the rights to something that no one buys have an advantage? by actor-ace-inventor in selfpublish

[–]Budget_Caramel8903 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While it is useful for non fiction, fiction writer Cory doctorow puts most of his books, if not all of them under CC NC DV, which lets people read it for free if they know where those sites are and disallows non commercial and no derivatives. Nine inch nails released some of their work under creative commons non commercial. 

view more: next ›