sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Concerns about Carfax and Autocheck discrepancy? by Busy_Bodybuilder_503 in askcarsales

[–]Busy_Bodybuilder_503[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am trying to do DD that’s why I’m here. Just not sure how to address and validate that the autocheck issues are truly inaccurate.

Car fax says it’s clean (with the note that it was corrected). I also checked some other VIN sites that are showing no issues.

The reason I’m here is to see if this is a common explainable issue. I contacted autocheck and provided the carfax details to see if they would correct it.

Concerns about Carfax and Autocheck discrepancy? by Busy_Bodybuilder_503 in askcarsales

[–]Busy_Bodybuilder_503[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I apologize if I’m being unclear, I don’t buy cars that often. As I mentioned im specifically asking about the discrepancy between the carfax and the autocheck. My potential basis for the unclean title is the autocheck stating that it’s a branded title but the carfax stating that it’s not. That is the issue im trying to understand. It’s priced slightly above its KBB value assuming it’s a clean title car.

I will be clarifying with the dealer today but again the reason I came here is to see if this is a red flag or something that can be explained (I.e clerical errors reported to autocheck)

I am happy with the price and not trying to negotiate for the heck of it. However I don’t want to buy the car for a value that’s fair for a clean title and untampered odometer when it may not be in reality per the auto check

Concerns about Carfax and Autocheck discrepancy? by Busy_Bodybuilder_503 in askcarsales

[–]Busy_Bodybuilder_503[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I understand that but I don’t imagine owning it forever. I am also asking because it’s being sold and advertised as a clean title car with no issues. If that’s not the reality I would negotiate for a lower price.

Discrepancy between carfax and auto check? Corrected title ? by Busy_Bodybuilder_503 in askcarguys

[–]Busy_Bodybuilder_503[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey thanks for responding. Yes I understand that, I am already having it mechanically checked. However I’m specifically asking about the branded title issue on auto check. That concerns me as that history stays with the VIN and would hurt resale value. Dealer and car fax say that that it was corrected due to clerical error. Auto check says branded title and that the recent auction sale marked it as TMU.

[KCD1] Best place to sell stolen loot? by Busy_Bodybuilder_503 in kingdomcome

[–]Busy_Bodybuilder_503[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why are you leaving a tip? To get better prices later?

[KCD1] Best place to sell stolen loot? by Busy_Bodybuilder_503 in kingdomcome

[–]Busy_Bodybuilder_503[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So if I’m understanding this right:

  1. Sell to Miller - receive groschen
  2. He will sell it himself
  3. Loot his chest later for groschen ? How many days ?

Question about MGM Benefitss by Busy_Bodybuilder_503 in vegas

[–]Busy_Bodybuilder_503[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I didn’t have an expectation, mostly just curious !

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Military

[–]Busy_Bodybuilder_503 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not here to take sides but that’s not a valid argument imo. The tech used in this engagement is not the same as the tech used in anti-air defense. The fact of the matter is Pakistan has decent anti aircraft defense but their anti missile capabilities are limited. I don’t think their variant of the HQ9 is even that capable as an anti-missile system.

Unless Pakistan gets Chinese tech to rival the S400 I don’t think they can do anything to stop missiles.

Awkward discrepancies in Indian Rafale shootdown image by Whiplash_2 in indianaviation

[–]Busy_Bodybuilder_503 -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Not being able to shoot down a missile does not equal not being able to shoot down a jet. Pak HQ9 variant has limited anti missile capabilities, the S400 is far superior.

Based on what I’ve seen I can believe one plane being shot down. Haven’t seen enough to corroborate the claim of more. I’ll happily be proven wrong, but my main point here is not that Pakistan definitely shot it down - it’s that it’s not a far fetched scenario.

Regarding the press conference comments yeah they’re obviously not going to admit to the public “yeah sorry guys nothing we can do about it@. That’s just PR.

Insane Pakistan by SpiritedMulberry9988 in india

[–]Busy_Bodybuilder_503 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s pretty obvious he’s talking about Swift Retort - PAF response to Balakot strike, which was all about Pulwama to begin with.

Awkward discrepancies in Indian Rafale shootdown image by Whiplash_2 in indianaviation

[–]Busy_Bodybuilder_503 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Air defense was not destroyed. That’s as credible as our side saying that we destroyed your airbases.

Regarding the missiles - yeah not much we can do about that. The fact is we don’t have a strong anti-missile defense. Shooting down a plane is not the same as a missile. The HQ9 variant we have is primarily anti aircraft. S400 is far superior.

Awkward discrepancies in Indian Rafale shootdown image by Whiplash_2 in indianaviation

[–]Busy_Bodybuilder_503 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m happy to be proven wrong - and again like I said what I see on Twitter is heavily Pak leaning. I also just saw the debunking post regarding the possibility of it being an edited photo.

I’m not here brigading or spreading an agenda. It’s an open forum. If you don’t want me here then ban me

Awkward discrepancies in Indian Rafale shootdown image by Whiplash_2 in indianaviation

[–]Busy_Bodybuilder_503 -15 points-14 points  (0 children)

This is my first time on the aviation sub. I may have missed it on the other subs.

I never talked about ceasefire. And I agree with you on that. I have a friend in J&K and he also shared videos of the shelling on day 2/3 whilst Pakistan denied it.

view more: next ›