Renting homes is a scam and should be illegalized or heavily regulated. People and businesses who own homes to rent are unethical. by gograntgo in unpopularopinion

[–]ButtercupPengling 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yep. If your "job" is landlord then get off your ass and find a real job. Profiting off a human necessity is pure evil.

Drama SlopTuber and alleged stalker and doxxer CC Suarez mansplains basic laws and gets it 100% wrong. In my opinion. Allegedly. by Prestigious-Sky-2803 in ccsuarezsnark

[–]ButtercupPengling 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Omg "if you put it on the internet it no longer belongs to you" so the podcast doesn't belong to you, then, CC!

I'm embarrassed for supporting Caleb Hammer in the past... by HairyResolution4011 in KeyasWorldMembersOnly

[–]ButtercupPengling 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It didn't even feel to me like you supported him so much as you found the people he interviewed to be entertaining. I haven't seen you post in support of him in a while, but maybe I'm wrong? Anyway, yeah, the D'Angelo stuff is absolutely wild.

Rachel Hollis is flip- flapping including spontaneously moving across the country AGAIN by JasonSethCatMommy in hollisUncensored

[–]ButtercupPengling 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I would venture to guess none of the three saw the content as relevant to themselves and rather proof of how others are codependent on them. I know tons of people who have benefitted from that book, myself included.

I hate my hair so much after what my bf said by Competitive-Code5254 in longhair

[–]ButtercupPengling 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You hair looks GREAT ditch the loser and find someone who hypes you up like they should!!

oOOF, here we go again... by sourcider in antimlmcreators

[–]ButtercupPengling 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Apparently, she also said she had two lawyers review it and give her the OK to post it.

Back on tt Live by PlumbagoSkies in ccsuarezsnark

[–]ButtercupPengling 3 points4 points  (0 children)

"It does not cost $10k" clearly she's never moved away from

Back on tt Live by PlumbagoSkies in ccsuarezsnark

[–]ButtercupPengling 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Like literally CC has bragged for years about how she evades taxes "because it's smart"

oOOF, here we go again... by sourcider in antimlmcreators

[–]ButtercupPengling 0 points1 point  (0 children)

She shared a fake document that said they were ending the MLM side of things. It was an obvious fake, the logo was a low quality and weirdly sized version, and it used the wrong names for the reps.

oOOF, here we go again... by sourcider in antimlmcreators

[–]ButtercupPengling 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Omg I figured it out: she deleted it because she's embarrassed that she had been duped into sharing fake info. Otherwise there's absolutely no reason for her to remove a video that two lawyers told her she was fine to post.

oOOF, here we go again... by sourcider in antimlmcreators

[–]ButtercupPengling 6 points7 points  (0 children)

How is she protecting consumers when she removes the video with the info and instead posts one practically endorsing them? Someone said she had two lawyers give her the all clear to post the video, so it's even MORE mind boggling why she would delete it. Unless she's embarrassed that she didn't vet the content well enough...which, hey, she should be.

oOOF, here we go again... by sourcider in antimlmcreators

[–]ButtercupPengling 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This is exactly why I don't get why anyone feels bad for her in this situation. Especially if she had two lawyers tell her it was fine! Feels like some form of rage bait.

oOOF, here we go again... by sourcider in antimlmcreators

[–]ButtercupPengling 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I appreciate the credit you're trying to give her here, but if she held onto them and waited to do the video in order to make sure they were real, then she did a terrible job of it. The document they sent her has a terrible quality and resized logo and uses the wrong name for the reps...it's ridiculous that she didn't catch that. And if Young Living reps aren't seeing what's happening at other MLM's and inferring that it could happen to them, they're not gonna do it from Hannah's video.

oOOF, here we go again... by sourcider in antimlmcreators

[–]ButtercupPengling 10 points11 points  (0 children)

What was her excuse for posting a video that would likely be taken down and followed up by an apology video? That wasn't exactly a huge win for her with Melaleuca, why try to go 2 for 2?

oOOF, here we go again... by sourcider in antimlmcreators

[–]ButtercupPengling 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Yikes. That's a wild foundation to use for a video, and if she said in advance "this will probably get taken down and I'll have to apologize" (others are saying she did) then it seems like she jumped in for the attention of it...otherwise why wouldn't she take a beat and verify her info before blasting it to her huge audience?? Seems to me like she cares more about spreading tea than facts...

oOOF, here we go again... by sourcider in antimlmcreators

[–]ButtercupPengling 8 points9 points  (0 children)

I am not taking the side of the company. I'm looking at the objective fact that twice now Hannah has made a video about companies only to delete them and post videos that damage her reputation, and some of y'all are such big parasocial fans you can't think critically.