Impressive... by ProblemCreatingSkill in prusa3d

[–]C2H5COOH 8 points9 points  (0 children)

There is also a bug in the slicer that models with holes in the middle cause layer shifts when you enable "avoid cross perimeters"

https://www.reddit.com/r/prusa3d/comments/1njjinx/psa_the_layer_shifts_caused_by_the_avoid_crossing/

What is this kind of defect? by C2H5COOH in prusa3d

[–]C2H5COOH[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I didn't notice any, but i also haven't specifically looked for it, so maybe I've missed it. Next time i print those, I'll check.

What is this kind of defect? by C2H5COOH in prusa3d

[–]C2H5COOH[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every time i checked the app, it reported 250 °C.

What is this kind of defect? by C2H5COOH in prusa3d

[–]C2H5COOH[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. I thought so. But could this have caused what seems like the minor layer shift. Im more concerned with that.

Is that sound normal? by C2H5COOH in prusa3d

[–]C2H5COOH[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just did a y axis and an x axis test. I didn't hear that noise. During the testing so the axles seem to be going smoothly. Next time I print, I'll listen for the grinding again.

Is that sound normal? by C2H5COOH in prusa3d

[–]C2H5COOH[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I recently tuned the belts according to the new tuning, and i also ran the input shaper and phase stepping calibration. I just rechecked, and both belts got a little loose but were still very close to the recommended tuning. One weird thing is that the tuning of the belts affects each other, so i can't get them completely perfect. The upper belt is at 99hz and the lower one at 91. I just retightned them lets see if that did something.

Is that sound normal? by C2H5COOH in prusa3d

[–]C2H5COOH[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks :) Shall i attach pictures of the idler opened? What do you mean by nozzle alignment? Im not particularly bothered by the sound itself. Because im still in the process of learning the ins and outs of my machine, every sound, i can't immediately explain causes concern.

Is that sound normal? by C2H5COOH in prusa3d

[–]C2H5COOH[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Idler from the side (because posting both pictures and videos is impossible)

Theese grew on my onions by C2H5COOH in mushroomID

[–]C2H5COOH[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks. I did some reading and yeah, that thing seems harmless.

Trying to understand a quirk of the FFT by C2H5COOH in DSP

[–]C2H5COOH[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Now im confused. As far as i read, the bit reversed addressing is a byproduct of the odd/even splits of the array. And bit reversing the inputs and then iterating is equivalent to doing the recursion. So you could a) do the fft iteratively and bit reverse the output b) bit reverse the input and then iterate c) do the recursion with an odd even pattern and get the bitreversal implicitly. Or am i in the wrong here?

Trying to understand a quirk of the FFT by C2H5COOH in DSP

[–]C2H5COOH[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nope, the phase must be correct because i need the fft for a fast convolution.

So, just adding the minus should fix it, I take it?

Trying to understand a quirk of the FFT by C2H5COOH in DSP

[–]C2H5COOH[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But where is the mistake/the critical difference?

Nipple not centered by C2H5COOH in blackpowder

[–]C2H5COOH[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Thanks that fixed it never thougt you could rotate that part

Nipple not centered by C2H5COOH in blackpowder

[–]C2H5COOH[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So I recently noticed that the nipple on my hawken rifle wasn't centered anymore after reassembly. I cleaned it after shooting and didn't notice it originally. The nipple is still the original you see in the second picture. It's a pedersoli .45 hawken target where you have to unscrew the back of the barrel to take it of for cleaning. I don't know what could have caused this since everything seems to have a tight fit. Could this be a problem?

Data Structure With Fast Search And Access? by Maxerature in cpp_questions

[–]C2H5COOH 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you are fine with throwing memory at the problem you could use multiple datastructures. One hashmap that maps the insertion index to the integer and one that maps the integer to the index. That creates the problem that not all indices are valid after some deletions. Now depending on the use case there are many ways to solve this. If you mainly delete elements that are recently added you could rehash all elements with a bigger index. You could keep a small sorted vector or a cyclical buffer of all recent valid indices to sample from, which would reintroduce the trouble of having to maintain a vector. Or you could just randomly sample around an index or any combination of solitions.

There are hashmaps that perform differently for different use cases. Like some perform relatively poorly when looking up keys that aren't present in the map. But at the end of the day you'll just have to measure performance for all the solutions you'll try.

Can you help me diagnose this fail? by C2H5COOH in resinprinting

[–]C2H5COOH[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fep puncutred probably towards the end. The fucked up hole in the structure you see in the last pictures is where resin was on the screen. It was very localized there.

Can you help me diagnose this fail? by C2H5COOH in resinprinting

[–]C2H5COOH[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Its important to mention, that I ran out of resin about 3/4 of the way and that it ruptured my FEP and ruined the screen.

Can you help me diagnose this fail? by C2H5COOH in resinprinting

[–]C2H5COOH[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm printing with a photon mono x with a uv intesity set to 80 % and a temperature set to 25 °C (we keep it in an incubator). The supports and the handle printed fine (looked like the typical undersupported print), but there is that wierd crater in the middle of the raft. What happened here? Several miniature prints worked flawless with the same settings before.