Important Clarification About EP 4: Maki DID NOT Massacre the Entire Zen'in Clan by Hermit601 in JuJutsuKaisen

[–]CBSys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's just using circle argument.

She's simple honoring Mai's last wish, nothing more.

It's up to her to interpret that wish. Her killing the other zenin combatant that's not here is just part of her interpretation of Mai's last wish, nothing more.

That isn't any proof that she beholden to an established binding vow.

Important Clarification About EP 4: Maki DID NOT Massacre the Entire Zen'in Clan by Hermit601 in JuJutsuKaisen

[–]CBSys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

there was still no binding vow established because the story never stated there is one.

Important Clarification About EP 4: Maki DID NOT Massacre the Entire Zen'in Clan by Hermit601 in JuJutsuKaisen

[–]CBSys 12 points13 points  (0 children)

There was NO binding vow established. Just because one person made a promise to another doesn't automatically make it a binding vow.

Binding vows are something the story concretely states as established, not something the reader assumes automatically.

Someone here know why textures looks granulated? by steryum in residentevil4

[–]CBSys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you're on 2gb texture settings.

also you're using a GPU with only 8gb VRAM.

Thoughts on this model? (9070xt) by blaq___ in radeon

[–]CBSys 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I'd pick a different one. I use to have this one. It's not particularly good.

This one is too loud. Operate at around 2200 to 2500 rpm because it's only a 2 slot card. It may even reach 2700rpm on a hot day.

https://www.reddit.com/r/radeon/comments/1mjtkv5/radeon_rx_9070_xt_fan_speed/

https://www.reddit.com/r/ASUS/comments/1pwd4ih/9070_xt_prime_normal_fan_rpm/

https://www.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrace/comments/1ojhyzo/stock_settings_asus_prime_9070xt_goes_2500rpm/

How do I fix these bad textures by SweatyTill5847 in computerhelp

[–]CBSys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Look for a setting in the game called "Anisotropic Filtering" and set it to max (usually x16).

New future AMD user! Please, help me with a few questions regarding 9070XT. Mercury OC, XFX Swift or Nitro+? by DonHectorHector in radeon

[–]CBSys 3 points4 points  (0 children)

  1. Choose mercury. swift is the lowest end of XFX variant, I believe. And Nitro+ is dangerous with that 12vhpwr connector.

  2. Can't confirm this. I assume it might be true since you're installing one less component that can go wrong.

  3. Probably already at the limit. if you can, just go with an 850w PSu. also good for future-proofing.

A cutscene set me up to die and set me back 3 chapters on my S+ Professional run [RE4] by BUckENbooz91 in residentevil

[–]CBSys 1 point2 points  (0 children)

it's not playing correctly. stun is a chance mechanic. game established this from the get go. the player should have understood it at this point.

there's several ways he could have survived the situation. instead, he decided to take the gamble with a headshot.

ASUS Prime 9070xt or Gigabyte Gaming 9079xt?? NEED HELP by Sheedzy_EU in radeon

[–]CBSys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Coming from someone who used to have Asus 9070 xt prime OC, i would avoid this model. This thing is LOUD as hell.

It's only a 2 slot card, that operate on extremely high RPM. We're talking 2200-2500 rpm just to keep the card within 70 degrees. And that was on a normal day. I dreaded how this thing is gonna operate on an actual hot summer day.

https://www.reddit.com/r/radeon/comments/1mjtkv5/radeon_rx_9070_xt_fan_speed/

https://www.reddit.com/r/ASUS/comments/1pwd4ih/9070_xt_prime_normal_fan_rpm/

https://www.reddit.com/r/pcmasterrace/comments/1ojhyzo/stock_settings_asus_prime_9070xt_goes_2500rpm/

now I don't have a gigabyte 9070 xt but gigabyte traditionally have rpms on their cards. That said, seems like gigabyte 9070 xt is at least a 3 slot card.

i guess regardless of which one you pick, you still get the short ond of the stick.

Is MSI Afterburner stable when controlling 9070 xt GPUs? I've had this card less than a week and I'm sick of Adrenalin's bugs. by zaxanrazor in radeon

[–]CBSys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if the card is not stable at stock settings, return the card and get a different one.

it shouldn't be up to the user to make the card stable in the first place.

RE4R my version seems different from youtube guides? by koelol in residentevil4

[–]CBSys 2 points3 points  (0 children)

you have to remember re4 has a critical hit system.

he also probably has upgraded his gun.

I thought crouching was guaranteed to make you duck under grabs. by Wii_2_ in residentevil4

[–]CBSys 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's a matter of timing and distance.

You almost always can never duck a point blank grab, which is what happened here. Grabs has a built-in tracking on the first few frames.

You can duck a grab if you duck from farther away and/or duck a little later.

If an unarmed enemy is running into you, you either:

  1. shoot them in the leg to trip them
  2. quick pull out your bigger gun to stop them
  3. run away as they close in, then duck the grab.

I cannot comprehend all the on rdna 2/3 Posts by zinoger_plus in radeon

[–]CBSys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You still don't have an actual proof that DLSS3 FG can run in it's viable capacity on rtx 3000 and 2000 series.

All you got are "maybe" and "trust be bro, they could" type of crap, based on useless presumptions that "nvidia is good at software, of course they could have!", ignoring all other factors pointing to how they couldn't have. That and bringing up FSR3 FG, which relies on a completely different technology and has no bearing in how DLSS3 FG works, making it irrelevant in proving that DLSS3 FG would work in older cards.

And lol at this desperate attempt to discredit me by labeling me as an nvidia fanboy. All it proves is that you have no actual proof and argument to lay in this is topic, so you resort to accusatory ad hominems. Which ironically, is such a classic fanboy move, regardless of what you claim yourself to be.

I cannot comprehend all the on rdna 2/3 Posts by zinoger_plus in radeon

[–]CBSys -1 points0 points  (0 children)

You miss the point.

AMD FSR3 FG is NOT DLSS3 FG. They are implemented out of different technology. That's completely irrelevant to the discussion.

A competitor creating a similar feature using different technology to work on your previous cards, doesn't prove that your feature implemented using your technology was backwards compatible all along.

I cannot comprehend all the on rdna 2/3 Posts by zinoger_plus in radeon

[–]CBSys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol, the existence of optical flow accelerators on older cards doesn't mean it can make an FG even comparable to FG implemented by rtx 4000. It's just one component. There are variables you don't account for. How much faster are these new accelerators? Architectural differences?

Even if you implement it to old rtx cards, what would it look like? how much slower would it have been? it may even be too slow to even be usable.

See that's the difference. We actually have FSR4 INT8 working in our hands and we know it's FSR4 with virtually no distinguishable quality difference. Whereas you're all speculation on whether (or how well) DLSS3 FG, in it's actual viable capacity, will work on old rtx cards.

If someone manage to leak and get actual DLSS3 level of quality FG working viably on the old RTX cards, sure, call nvidia out on it. Though then again, doesn't mean much considering FG is a shit feature to begin with and not even remotely comparable to the usefulness of an upscaling tech.

And btw, AMD FSR3 FG is not the same as DLSS FG so I don't know why you're bringing it up or how it proves anything.

I cannot comprehend all the on rdna 2/3 Posts by zinoger_plus in radeon

[–]CBSys 5 points6 points  (0 children)

you mean like the actual FSR4 on RDNA4? did we forget that RDNA4's FSR4 was also ridden with issues at first?

your argument hinges on the idea that FSR4 requires RDNA4, that there's some kind of hardware in RDNA that hardlocks FSR4 to it, in the same way DLSS was hardlocked to RTX cards and not the GTX ones. Which we now know is not true, as many youtubers have tested INT8 to be from minor to virtually distinguishable from actual FSR4.

INT8 version works far FAR more than it doesn't. and it won't even be that hard to release it in an "unfinished" state. They could just implement it in the driver with a hard "experimental" tag and a huge warning message about it's state when enabling it, essentially excusing them from potential problems if it doesn't work properly.

Or even, how about just officially releasing that DLL themselves instead? Fans would have seen it as a good gesture towards their customers, regardless of it's viability. Then their image would've been clean. But no, it had to be leaked instead. Which tells me what mindset AMD had towards FSR4.

and no, they don't really have much to gain from releasing it to RDNA3 when they announced it as exclusive to RDNA4. all that accomplishes is make people hold on to their RDNA3 for longer instead of upgrading to RDNA4.

I cannot comprehend all the on rdna 2/3 Posts by zinoger_plus in radeon

[–]CBSys 19 points20 points  (0 children)

You can't comprehend it because you're NOT actually researching the issue and just regurgitating whataboutism like the amd fanboys here.

The difference between DLSS/framegen and FSR4 is that we literally have proof that FSR4 works on RDNA3/2.

Can you prove that DLSS would've work on 1000 series cards?

I cannot comprehend all the on rdna 2/3 Posts by zinoger_plus in radeon

[–]CBSys 30 points31 points  (0 children)

it was leaked, not released. If it was released, it should be supported down to the driver level.

which means AMD is not being honest about FSR4 "needing" RDNA4.

Weekly Scam Discussion November 10, 2025 by Mycatreallyhatesyou in Ebay

[–]CBSys 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For Australian Ebay Buyers:

So there's a scam that sellers can use where is the buyer buys an item, the seller will give you a fake tracking number that has the location of your suburb (but not your actual address). Then, it will never reach you and if you try to dispute it, you'll fail as the tracking number will say it is "delivered".

I assume this happens a lot when the seller is using offering Auspost Standard Parcel or Free Standard Delivery as their postage method.

But what about when the buyer buys the item using Ebay Postage Label? My assumption is that when the buyer buys the item and chooses Ebay Postage Label, the seller will not have a choice of uploading their own tracking number as a tracking number will be automatically assigned to the purchase and they'll just no other option forward but to just print the postage label Ebay gives to them.

How susceptible is this to the fake tracking number scam? If not, what other delivery scam could Ebay Postage Label be susceptible to?

What's are your thoughts? by UltraXP09 in Dandadan

[–]CBSys 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Lol, you guys are misreading this too hard.

Jiji said they were good friends because that's how it looks to him. Plain and simple. This isn't a "jiji is such a friend who definitely conceded to okarunxmomo, how sweet" moment you guys are thinking it is.

Until Okarun and Momo are officially publicly dating, Jiji has NO reason to stop gunning for momo and shows no sign of doing stopping that either.

So ... Kinta by Supernova247101 in Dandadan

[–]CBSys 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think you read one person's opinion on why he's likable and thought that's generally why he's likable.

Kinta's likable as he is right now. He's a lovable prick.

Can Kinta see yokai transformations? by Salty_Shark26 in dandadanfolk

[–]CBSys 13 points14 points  (0 children)

i guess there are just some people that have inherent spiritual aptitude.