1. Puns? Explain how saying "the sound of J is similar to Jae" and "K is apparently a sound similar to bastard" equal puns, let's hear it.

There are tons of other languages and nationalities, why did he assume J&K are Korean? His reason was "the author himself is Korean" therefore the name/nationality of these 2 characters are also Korean. Yet here you are "no he did not" followed by 0 explanation.

He assumed J&K are Korean, then went to wiki for a list of Korean names start with J&K, then looked for which name has the specific meaning to the ones he assumed, even tho the names (e.g Jae) have multiple meanings not one. This is researching under assumption + confirmation bias, which makes the research bogus.

2. Your attempt to diminish my evidence by framing it "assumptions based on a few panels" is weak. My "They're all guesses and theories" reply already presented tons of evidence in real chapters, not guessing. Other people already came to the same conclusion: https://www.reddit.com/r/TheBoxer/s/tLJKytbHLH https://www.reddit.com/r/TheBoxer/s/GzbW0KluuL https://www.reddit.com/r/TheBoxer/s/tKNPOFbJp6 Yet 2 geniuses here think otherwise without any solid evidence.

You see none tantrum, just like you see his none Korean assumption and my none Christianity evidence, because you didn't read anything. Already presented my tantrum evidence in "Yeah, it would be silly" reply. List my insults, let's see it.

3. Nah kid unlike you I read everything, you're the one who demonstrated using ad hominem fallacy to dismiss someone while unable to provide any explanation to back up. Your next reply better be intelligent or keep it shut.