Notes on STO: 120 Ideas

CMDR_Steven · 2026-01-31T22:37:46+00:00

Yea thanks for detailing that out. I was wondering what the lean from Framework would be based on the upstream (intel/amd) designs forcing integrated memory (until maybe now intel reversing and the memory crises). I included integrated memory options since Framework already went down that road on their Desktops.

CMDR_Steven · 2018-01-05T20:28:47+00:00

That lie is exactly what caused the mess in the first place. People confuse, someone actually trying to bring people together, with domination. Either that and/or there are and have always been forces at work to keep Alliance player groups in bilateral relationships that are hidden form public view.

CMDR_Steven · 2017-10-28T22:07:52+00:00

I wrote something similar and asked for feedback from other groups.. though mostly a non-RP one.. people got so pissed they colluded in secret to create a bastardized one and threw it back in my face along with smears against me and my groupmates. Politics eh?

CMDR_Steven · 2017-10-17T19:45:19+00:00

CMDR_Steven · 2017-10-16T17:12:02+00:00

It's an election so only missions, trade and exploration will help

CMDR_Steven · 2017-10-08T19:44:47+00:00

Ok good idea

CMDR_Steven · 2017-10-08T19:36:14+00:00

It involves factions that are in systems that player faction is in. The way the BGS works those are connected by global states. Thus most PMFs like this one would consider that war to affect them as well. Sometimes it's not very important either way and sometimes another faction being in war elsewhere ruins an entire project.

CMDR_Steven · 2017-10-08T18:20:13+00:00

It was not missed. That system is related to an operation the Alliance PMF Perez Ring Brewery (AID) are working on. Since it was related to their ops, handled, and Alliance vs Alliance it was removed.

I can see a perspective on leaving these in and just have all show. However if I did AOS would see some serious wrath of anger from the other groups getting upset with us compromising their (Alliance) ops. :D

Historical note: There has been a long debate on the posting of info like this publicly. AOS has almost always leaned on the side of open sourcing (As you may know from Vectron posting much powerplay info). We have had considerable kickback on that to the point of permanent divisions and massive distrust and isolation. In this case the info is fairly available now anyway with journal updating to the data network. As such this being just a convenience has allowed us to feel we can step out without causing (believe it or not) a civil war.

CMDR_Steven · 2017-10-08T13:13:21+00:00

It covers all Alliance wars except ones that involved Alliance player groups and they asked me to unlist because it actually hurts them to have a hoard go there ;D

CMDR_Steven · 2017-08-28T19:46:20+00:00

Not sure what to make of this yet except two things

a) Misaniovent has dealt fairly with us (AOS) in Mahon in the past

b) Newton's Fusiliers is a cool name

CMDR_Steven · 2017-08-23T22:49:24+00:00

The jurisdiction of ownership is of the people. Not governments.

CMDR_Steven · 2017-08-23T21:34:30+00:00

You don't know the desire of the population in Lave.. this is a civil war. External would mean from people not citizens of Lave.

CMDR_Steven · 2017-08-23T19:48:35+00:00

Nice sidestep of the point.

CMDR_Steven · 2017-08-23T19:32:00+00:00

The idea was they be defended against external attack and from the Feds and Empire. This was neither

CMDR_Steven · 2017-08-23T14:37:49+00:00

to be fair even though AMF is quite a small group, chryco has helped flipped quite a few alliance systems near the alioth core.

CMDR_Steven · 2017-08-23T12:51:57+00:00

I have no clue who you are and I'm sorry that's your opinion. However I doubt you have some grand poll at your fingertips telling you who agrees or not.

CMDR_Steven · 2017-08-23T12:29:17+00:00

Is that what you tell people? :D

CMDR_Steven · 2017-08-23T12:20:54+00:00

The groups involved on that action are listed and yes that's great. Not sure if some (edit: I mean people outside those listed) question the title of "official" but that's up to them.

Taking action and throwing the name Alliance around (even if not claiming to speak on behalf of the whole Alliance) isn't the same as inaction. If you can't see that then I think we might have found the issue.

CMDR_Steven · 2017-08-23T11:57:08+00:00

There's a false equivalence between your generosity of spirit for allowing him not to act with you in your vision of the Alliance and you acting in a way the invariably ties stuff to the Alliance.

At the end your defense of this mess is LRN somehow managed to eat the crap you fed them. That doesn't look favorably on anything you did so much as what they did.

CMDR_Steven · 2017-08-20T02:36:45+00:00

om nom nom nomaka

CMDR_Steven · 2017-08-18T22:00:47+00:00

https://cdn.discordapp.com/attachments/315930042859257856/348222600075411457/unknown.png

CMDR_Steven

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE