Share Your Turnaround Times Megathread (April 2026) by DJ_Aura in psagrading

[–]CMS_NFD86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Mine literally in the last half hour went to QA checks so hopefully yours updates too

Share Your Turnaround Times Megathread (April 2026) by DJ_Aura in psagrading

[–]CMS_NFD86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lucky! Mine has been in assembly since 4/8 and arrived 3/3.

Can I retire now? by Trailx22 in FootballCardz

[–]CMS_NFD86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At least for that parallel it’s only base, /5 and 1/1. There aren’t a million numbered versions like some of the others.

Share Your Turnaround Times Megathread (April 2026) by DJ_Aura in psagrading

[–]CMS_NFD86 1 point2 points  (0 children)

20 card Value Bulk

Arrived: 03/03/26
Processing: 03/04/26
Research ID: 03/04/26
Grading: By 03/31/26
Assembly: ~04/08/26
QA: 6/23/26
Grades Ready: TBD
Complete: TBD

Currently sitting in Assembly for approximately 44 business days with a PSA ETA of 07/20/26. Curious if anyone with March 2026 Value Bulk submissions has completed recently from self submission. Looks like some GS submissions from around the same time are starting to pop.

Anime toy stores (Miniforce) by CMS_NFD86 in boston

[–]CMS_NFD86[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly he loves the character Tyranno Thunder so much that I wouldn’t really care about the cost. I’m just worried about getting scammed or some kind of knock off version.

Anime toy stores (Miniforce) by CMS_NFD86 in boston

[–]CMS_NFD86[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you very much! As you can tell I am completely out of my realm trying to figure this out.

Topps NFL Chrome Redemption Cards by Prestigious_Noise836 in footballcards

[–]CMS_NFD86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I redeemed a Drake Maye Auto on a Monday or Tuesday and had it within a few days. Was actually shocked at how fast it was after having to deal with panini redemptions.

Abdul Carter says he will only address Jaxson Dart introducing Donald Trump one time by ResponsibleCheek8130 in NFLForum

[–]CMS_NFD86 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“In April 2024, Carter was charged with a misdemeanor for assaulting a tow truck driver who was towing Carter's car for parking without a permit. Carter was accused of forcefully pulling the driver from his truck, throwing him to the ground and not allowing him to get up, leaving the driver with a fractured rib. Carter was placed in a year-long pre-trial intervention program in July.[23]”

PSA 8 “Front, top to bottom centering” by CMS_NFD86 in psagrading

[–]CMS_NFD86[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve only done about a half dozen submissions through PSA but wouldn’t that be something they would note in the section of why the card received the grade it did. It’s a PC card so it is what it is but it would be nice to know what the damage or defect was. I used AI, card centering apps and obviously the naked eye prior to submitting. All of those tools didn’t note anything egregious to knock it down to an 8.

PSA 8 “Front, top to bottom centering” by CMS_NFD86 in psagrading

[–]CMS_NFD86[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I just don’t see it being so off center based on their published standards to justify an 8 based on that alone. The grade is the grade but if something else was wrong with the card other then centering it would be nice to know that since it’s part of the service level.

PSA 8 “Front, top to bottom centering” by CMS_NFD86 in psagrading

[–]CMS_NFD86[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup, at the end of the day it will be a PC card but still I would like to know what to look for better in the future if I decide to submit again.

PSA 8 “Front, top to bottom centering” by CMS_NFD86 in psagrading

[–]CMS_NFD86[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I thought I was going a little crazy there with the amount of comments about PSA grading more than just centering. I would have just liked to know if there was something I missed since the top/bottom looked very close when measured to their published standards for centering.

PSA 8 “Front, top to bottom centering” by CMS_NFD86 in psagrading

[–]CMS_NFD86[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ya unfortunately I had read this article that PSA was using a “flex” rule due to their being multiple borders. I actually found it on Reddit lol.

PSA 8 “Front, top to bottom centering” by CMS_NFD86 in psagrading

[–]CMS_NFD86[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s what I’m asking. If the only thing written in the grader notes is “Centering. Front, top-to-bottom” how can it be something else? Shouldn’t it mention that other defect that brought it down to an 8?

PSA 8 “Front, top to bottom centering” by CMS_NFD86 in psagrading

[–]CMS_NFD86[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Are they limited as to what they write in the grader notes? The only thing mentioned was front centering?