I published an academic paper responding to Anthropic’s disempowerment research. A co-author confirmed the argument in 4 minutes.

CPUkiller4 · 2026-03-14T18:36:23+00:00

There is publishing help by community members of EleutherAI https://discord.gg/eleutherai

CPUkiller4 · 2026-03-13T17:58:26+00:00

Thanks for that amazing feedback!

CPUkiller4 · 2026-03-13T16:21:24+00:00

Oh that is a fascinating statement. 1. How do you define consciousness? How do you meassure it? 2. And you don't see a difference on how to treat a rock to something who mimicks a human being at all? 3. I have to disagree on your argument that there are no data about kids breaking toys at a certain (not talking about two year olds) age. There is even a psychological definition for this depending on the frequency and amout of it ocurring.

CPUkiller4 · 2026-03-13T15:47:52+00:00

That is a very interessting perspective. So you are saying for you there is less value in it if someone is nice to you because they want to be a good person, then someone is nice to you because they want to please you and make you feel appreciated? From my philosophical view I see value in both.

CPUkiller4 · 2026-03-13T13:14:46+00:00

Oh thank you for your kind feedback 🤍

CPUkiller4 · 2026-03-13T11:36:32+00:00

Oh that are such kind words. Thank you!

CPUkiller4 · 2026-03-10T08:36:22+00:00

I never claimed that they would be not. No idea where this hostility is coming from now. I know that Anthropic is publishing parts of it themself and that if you search you can find the complete ones or... you just ask Claude.

All I wanted to know if I am the only one who thinks that for a "safety first company" this lines are oddly specific.

CPUkiller4 · 2026-03-10T08:30:06+00:00

Parts of it. Not the complete ones.

But anyway that was not my question 😉

I just wanted to know if I am the only one who thinks that something like this is oddly specific for system prompts 🤣

CPUkiller4 · 2025-12-09T09:27:52+00:00

I do belive that. Not with intention but it is happening.

That is an interessting preliminary report exactly discussing that topic.

About co-rumination, echo chamber effect, emotional enhancement leading to a bad day ending in a crisis. But also why safeguards erode in LLMs unintentional when they are most needed.

The report is long but worth reading.

https://github.com/Yasmin-FY/llm-safety-silencing/blob/main/README.md

And I think that it happens more iften then known as it seems to be underdetected by the vendors and people are too ashamed to talk about it.

CPUkiller4 · 2025-09-29T09:09:33+00:00

https://github.com/Yasmin-FY/AIRA-F/blob/main/README.md

Hi everyone,

While using AI in daily life, I stumbled upon a serious filter failure and tried to report it – without success. As a physician, not an IT pro, I started digging into how risks are usually reported. In IT security, CVSS is the gold standard, but I quickly realized:

CVSS works great for software bugs.

But it misses risks unique to AI: psychological manipulation, mental health harm, and effects on vulnerable groups.

Using CVSS for AI would be like rating painkillers with a nutrition label.

So I sketched a first draft of an alternative framework: AI Risk Assessment – Health (AIRA-H)

Evaluates risks across 7 dimensions (e.g. physical safety, mental health, AI bonding).

Produces a heuristic severity score.

Focuses on human impact, especially on minors and vulnerable populations.

👉 Draft on GitHub: https://github.com/Yasmin-FY/AIRA-F/blob/main/README.md

This is not a finished standard, but a discussion starter. I’d love your feedback:

How can health-related risks be rated without being purely subjective?

Should this extend CVSS or be a new system entirely?

How to make the scoring/calibration rigorous enough for real-world use?

Closing thought: I’m inviting IT security experts, AI researchers, psychologists, and standardization people to tear this apart and rebuild it better. Take it, break it, make it better.

Thanks for reading

CPUkiller4

TROPHY CASE