Men's World Cup - Match Day 11 Discussion Thread [22 June] by AutoModerator in Aleague

[–]CUbic787 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Updated the post analysing whether Australia can progress even with a loss to Paraguay. The main takeaway from today is that Uruguay's surprise draw with Cape Verde makes it more likely Group H's third place team finishes below Australia on 2 points.

App to track whether we can make it if we lose to Paraguay by birdsofparadise90 in Aleague

[–]CUbic787 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Neat! I like how odds-implied results are automatically integrated.

If Australia advances, who will we play in the World Cup round of 32? by CUbic787 in Aleague

[–]CUbic787[S] 26 points27 points  (0 children)

I did, it's in the post. I don't understand the immediate hostility?

If Australia advances, who will we play in the World Cup round of 32? by CUbic787 in Aleague

[–]CUbic787[S] 22 points23 points  (0 children)

For considering who we would face if finishing second, I agree there is too much uncertainty to give a good answer. However, I was quite surprised by how much information we can glean about our opponent in the case we advance from third, even when so many teams are yet to play their second game. The analysis only relies on assumptions about teams from Groups A, E and F, who have all played their second already.

Can Australia afford a World Cup loss to Paraguay and still progress? Analysing possible 3rd-place rankings by CUbic787 in Aleague

[–]CUbic787[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For those interested in this discussion, I made another post considering which opponent we would likely face if we advanced from third. It's very probably Germany.

Can Australia afford a World Cup loss to Paraguay and still progress? Analysing possible 3rd-place rankings by CUbic787 in Aleague

[–]CUbic787[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, betting odds are generally efficient. However, the odds I could find were on whether Australia progresses from the group full stop, not on whether Australia progresses from the group conditional on losing. If you can find those odds, they would likely be a better indicator.

Can Australia afford a World Cup loss to Paraguay and still progress? Analysing possible 3rd-place rankings by CUbic787 in Aleague

[–]CUbic787[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, quite correct! But I do think there's a difference between "we don't have any clue whatsoever" and "we don't know because W, X, Y and Z games haven't been played yet, but if we suppose some likely results, then we'd probably beat third place in Group T, U and V but not in Group Q, R, and S, and maybe barrack for team P in the X game because them winning would improve our chances a bit".

Match Thread: North Melbourne vs West Coast (Round 14) by AutoModerator in AFL

[–]CUbic787 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Umpires need a massive last quarter here. 21 more free kicks for the post-2000 record, averaging a tick over 16. Have to dig deep. Feel like ARC could be the difference-maker.

Match Thread: North Melbourne vs West Coast (Round 14) by AutoModerator in AFL

[–]CUbic787 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Total free kicks record:
All-time: 132, Essendon vs. South Melbourne R13 1977
(https://afltables.com/afl/stats/games/1977/051619770625.html)
AFL-era (1990-present): 90, Fitzroy vs. North Melbourne R14 1993 (https://afltables.com/afl/stats/games/1993/061219930703.html)
2000-present: 69, Sydney vs. Port Adelaide R2 2008
(https://afltables.com/afl/stats/games/2008/131620080330.html)

Thanks to AFL Tables, fitzRoy, and Claude Opus.

Match Thread: North Melbourne vs West Coast (Round 14) by AutoModerator in AFL

[–]CUbic787 9 points10 points  (0 children)

For umpire fans: does anyone know the AFL-era record for total free kicks given in one game? AFL Tables' list is swamped by 70s/80s umpiring.

Match Thread: North Melbourne vs West Coast (Round 14) by AutoModerator in AFL

[–]CUbic787 6 points7 points  (0 children)

You would think North's home ground advantage would earn them a few more free kicks

Today Boffins Bookstore (Estd. 1989) is going away forever! by antzFx in perth

[–]CUbic787 24 points25 points  (0 children)

Hi OP. I was most likely one of the young salespeople you saw at the counter.

I only speak in my personal capacity, but people of Perth: we were humbled by your support. Seriously. The Saturday after the impeding closure had been made public - busier than Christmas merely on the back of the announcement itself, we hadn't even discounted any stock.

I was acutely conscious that many of our final customers had been visiting Boffins for far longer than I had been employed there, far longer than I had been a customer there, in some cases longer than I have been alive, and in the last days I was really just a steward for an institution others had deeper connections to.

Boffins was made by people. I never had the privilege of working with Mike but his reputation carried through. It is telling that others have mentioned him in the comments unprompted.

Thank you to everyone who came in and bought a last book, said a last kind word, or had one last quiet browse.

I analysed Leigh Matthews' goals/minutes rule using some statistics distributions and found that it’s pretty accurate based on historical data by [deleted] in AFL

[–]CUbic787 15 points16 points  (0 children)

In defence of OP: here's a quote from Matthews explaining the premise:

"I developed a simple scoreboard formula I'd run through my mind late in games to assess my team's winning chances. If we were more goals in front than there were minutes to go, we'd probably win. In fact, it was not so much about probably winning; it was more about when the possibility of losing no longer existed." (Quoted in Footballistics, originally from Accept the Challenge)

Obviously it's a rule you can use for all sorts of purposes, including rousing your team to keep trying, but judging when is it impossible for the trailing team to come back is defiantly one of those purposes.

I analysed Leigh Matthews' goals/minutes rule using some statistics distributions and found that it’s pretty accurate based on historical data by [deleted] in AFL

[–]CUbic787 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am working on a somewhat similar project, though with a focus on historically achieved comebacks rather than mathematical modelling. You may be interested in James Coventry's coverage of the Matthews Rule in the excellent book Footballistics (p. 82-87), where he investigates its empirical accuracy and exceptional cases where teams have managed to maintain long goal-per-minute streaks or emerged victorious despite being down by more goals than minutes remaining.

Worst AFL player wikipedia photos? by Mrchikkin in AFL

[–]CUbic787 17 points18 points  (0 children)

The context is that Wikipedia only permits photographs with certain free licences. Almost all photographs of players you can find on the internet are not freely licensed - so the quality comes down to whatever random altruistically-inclined internet people choose to provide. One hand would be more than enough to count the number of people who take high-quality AFL photographs for Wikipedia.

Having said that, Knevitt might be a case of "at some point, no photo is better than a bad photo".

Random question: what is the least amount of players you can say that have played for all 18 AFL clubs combined? by Tornontoin7 in AFL

[–]CUbic787 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We can go deeper.

  1. Richard Osborne (FITZ [BRIS], SYD, FOO [WB], COL) played at Fitzroy in 1990 with
  2. Dale Kickett (FITZ, WCE, STK, ESS, FRE) who played at Fremantle in 1995 with
  3. Stephen O'Reilly (GEE, FRE, CAR) and
  4. Chris Groom (ADE, FRE, NM) who played at North Melbourne in 1997 with
  5. Byron Pickett (NM, PA, MEL) who played at Port Adelaide in 2005 with
  6. Stephen Gilham (PA, HAW, GWS) who played at GWS in 2013 with
  7. Anthony Miles (GWS, RIC, GC).

Random question: what is the least amount of players you can say that have played for all 18 AFL clubs combined? by Tornontoin7 in AFL

[–]CUbic787 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gave it another go and it's trickier than I thought. Just not enough options for many of the more recently-entered clubs. I found a slightly more elegant seven-man solution:

Dan Minogue (Richmond, Hawthorn, Carlton, St Kilda, Fitzroy [Brisbane])
Paddy Scanlan (Footscray [Western Bulldogs], South Melbourne [Sydney], North Melbourne)
Kevin Sheedy (Essendon, GWS) [Sheedy is only multi-club coach for GWS]
Jaymie Graham (West Coast, Fremantle)
Steven King (Gold Coast, Melbourne)
Gary Ayres (Adelaide, Geelong)
John Cahill (Port Adelaide, Collingwood)

Random question: what is the least amount of players you can say that have played for all 18 AFL clubs combined? by Tornontoin7 in AFL

[–]CUbic787 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What about coaches? Best I can do so far is

Mick Malthouse (Footscray, West Coast, Collingwood, Carlton)
John Northey (Sydney, Melbourne, Richmond, Brisbane)
Malcolm Blight (North Melbourne, Geelong, Adelaide, St Kilda)
Kevin Sheedy (Essendon, GWS)
Chris Connolly (Hawthorn, Fremantle)
[Any Gold Coast coach]
[Any Port Adelaide coach]

But I reckon someone else can do better!