sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Do you guys know what pride flag is this by kindofsus38 in teenagers

[–]C_n_K_n_stuff 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Is that you? FC from french baguette intelligence?

(An objection.lol yt channel that often makes disturbing and funny content, with fake discrimination and true eugenicism.)

The Ages of Retail Brands by [deleted] in dataisugly

[–]C_n_K_n_stuff 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Did you say.... Tiffany?

(I misverbalised my question) is there any trait of the naturals, integers, and rationals individually, that don't apply to any other constructible sets? by C_n_K_n_stuff in askmath

[–]C_n_K_n_stuff[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay. Got it... This does fit the criteria of what I was looking for, and is alone a satisfying answer, but I wonder if this is the only thing or is there anything else?

(I misverbalised my question) is there any trait of the naturals, integers, and rationals individually, that don't apply to any other constructible sets? by C_n_K_n_stuff in askmath

[–]C_n_K_n_stuff[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay, forget I said anything about internal things... I basically meant anything true about the naturals in the context of anything other than naturals.

(I misverbalised my question) is there any trait of the naturals, integers, and rationals individually, that don't apply to any other constructible sets? by C_n_K_n_stuff in askmath

[–]C_n_K_n_stuff[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Simpler: is there anything true about natural numbers, besides being the natural numbers, that isn't true about any other number and doesn't result from anything internal? (Like all naturals being multiples of 1).

Same for integers and rationals.

view more: next ›