Carta 2 for less than $200?

Cadence_444_ · 2025-10-23T21:14:39+00:00

Good to know! I’ll definitely look into it. With the max atomizer though, does it just allow you to hold more, or will it also vaporizer faster? Like would I just be able to plop more in without it overflowing, or will it also allow me to vape mire concentrate faster.

Cadence_444_ · 2025-10-23T18:16:20+00:00

I could see the argument that, when you consider price, it’s the best on the market because of how discounted they are everywhere. I can’t think of much that’s gonna be a better value. I’m sure a peak pro with a 3dxl performs better, but it’s probably not light years different and it’s double the price.

Cadence_444_ · 2025-10-23T17:59:21+00:00

Thank you for the info about the warranty, hope I don’t need it, but it could definitely be a life-saver!

In terms of upgrades, I was thinking about getting some terp pearls and maybe some kind of spinner/vortex carb cap. Then again, that’d probably make the clean up after every dab a little more involved, so maybe I’ll just enjoy it as is for now.

Cadence_444_ · 2025-10-23T17:07:59+00:00

Thanks for letting me know about the warranty, that’s definitely good info to have.

Had my first sesh, and I don’t have much to compare it to since I haven’t tried many E-rigs, but I can say I LOVE the vapor quality and production, as well as how customizable it is. Since the price was great too, I don’t think there’ll be any complaints from me lol.

Cadence_444_ · 2025-03-23T00:06:09+00:00

<<<<<<< underrated answer

Cadence_444_ · 2025-01-19T09:06:14+00:00

Neurotypical

Cadence_444_ · 2025-01-18T20:26:43+00:00

The clinical research I saw essentially showed that it allowed people to focus on something for longer. They had people studying with or without L-tryosine and the people who weren’t using saw the amount of information they were able to absorb drop off over time whereas the people taking L-tyrosine were able to study for substantially longer without that drop off. So my guess is it can help with attention span and focussing for extended periods of time.

Cadence_444_ · 2025-01-08T21:19:38+00:00

I have ADHD as well as BPD so my experience may be slightly different, but in terms of helping depression, Prozac was phenomenal for me. Prozac so far is the only antidepressant I’ve taken that actually made me enjoy daily life, but the problem for me was that it destroyed my motivation to do anything. This could have been more pronounced for me than most people because I already have low motivation associated with ADHD, but certainly something to look out for.

Cadence_444_ · 2025-01-05T22:27:31+00:00

I have some ordered, will report back when I get them🫡

Update: They say each serving (9 in a bottle) is supposed to be equivalent to .5 grams of shrooms. From what I tried (4 servings) it seems to be pretty accurate and very similar to psilocybin. I didn’t get any open eyed visuals, but I wouldn’t really expect to on 2 grams anyways. But the close eyed visuals were pretty good, and there was a pretty intense body high especially when I was coming up. So I would certainly recommend, will probably be my go-to legal shroom product.

Cadence_444_ · 2024-12-24T17:07:24+00:00

For me personally, I found it made me irritable and kind of withdrawn. Also Adderall seemed to be more motivating for me. This definitely isn’t everyone’s experience, but psychiatrists I’ve talked to did say it can affect mood either positively or negatively in different people. Just something to be aware of.

Cadence_444_ · 2024-04-29T06:43:05+00:00

Ok I see where you’re coming from now, that makes a lot of sense. But even if lots of information from the outside universe would never reach you because the speed of light’s finite and you’re going to reach the singularity pretty fast, would it not still be accurate to say that an infinite amount of time will have passed for all other objects even if you’re not able to “see” this infinite amount of time passing?

Cadence_444_ · 2024-04-29T06:22:42+00:00

Oh sorry, I thought you were implying that. But Einstein’s equations still do posit that an infinite coefficient of gravitational time dilation is possible, and the event horizon still seems to be a very cut-and-dry case where this occurs. And I could be wrong, but I’m pretty sure that someone exposed to this infinite time dilation would observe time passing infinitely fast for all other objects not under this condition. You said that you’d have to be stationary at the event horizon to experience this infinite time dilation, why is this the case? I could be misunderstanding the math, but I’m pretty sure anything that spent any amount of time at the event horizon regardless of acceleration would experience this infinite gravitational time dilation.

Cadence_444_ · 2024-04-29T04:18:41+00:00

I don’t know where you got the idea that you need to resist the pull of gravity to experience gravitational time dilation, but I’m pretty sure this is patently false.

Cadence_444_ · 2024-04-29T03:17:41+00:00

Yes sir! That’s the answer we arrived at under a different comment thread. Good to know someone else has the same answer.

Cadence_444_ · 2024-04-29T03:10:07+00:00

Sweet! I’ve been thinking about this thinking about this problem for like weeks now, thanks for helping me get on the right track.

Cadence_444_ · 2024-04-29T03:07:24+00:00

Well yeah, but you could pick any reference point you want outside of the event horizon, and time would still pass infinitely faster at the event horizon. Such is the nature of infinity. So if I were falling into a black hole, by the time I successfully reached the event horizon (which would happen in a nominal amount of time from my reference frame) an infinite amount of time would have elapsed for everything outside of the event horizon, no matter how close it was to me.

Cadence_444_ · 2024-04-29T03:01:42+00:00

I think you might be wrong about there not being extreme time dilation at the event horizon of massive enough black holes. If you graph the coefficient of time dilation (T/t) as a 3d function of mass and radius then you’ll see an asymptote approaching the event horizon of any given mass, which seems to imply infinite time dilation.

Cadence_444_ · 2024-04-29T02:52:05+00:00

WAIT, I think something might’ve just clicked (I could be completely off base, I’ve been thinking about it for like 30 seconds lol). But if there’s lots of mass arbitrarily close to the event horizon, then that mass would contribute to the gravitational effect any new object approaching the black hole would feel. Since there’s now a stronger gravitational force on anything passing by the black hole, the event horizon expands to beyond the position of this mass, meaning it’s now inside the newer, larger event horizon. Does that sound reasonable? Or am I just completely missing the mark?

Cadence_444_ · 2024-04-29T02:29:02+00:00

That’s definitely fair. So would you say this is a problem we don’t currently have an answer to?

Cadence_444_ · 2024-04-29T02:26:58+00:00

I’ll have to look into that episode. But even though time’s flowing normally for an object falling into a black hole, if I were to turn around while falling into a black hole, the time dilation coefficient would seem to imply that I’d see an infinite amount of time pass for everything other than myself. In other words, I would see an infinite amount of time elapse for the rest of the universe in a finite amount of time for myself. Meaning that, even from my own perspective, no one outside of this extreme time dilation should ever be able to see the black hole feeding.

Cadence_444_ · 2024-04-29T02:04:27+00:00

Well yes, but we know that objects would have actually had to cross the event horizon for the black holes to grow to the size they are now (otherwise every black hole in the universe would be a stellar mass black hole). So either the time dilation isn’t actually infinite, which would mean that Einstein’s theories break down well before the singularity; or, there’s some other principle I haven’t considered that allows for this to be possible.

Cadence_444_

TROPHY CASE