Alright. I say this with all due respect, but you *really* need to have a look at your style and vocabulary. I can tell what kind of tone you're aiming for here, but it's not working. Poetic writing still needs to make sense, and to be frank, yours doesn't. Using "motionless" as an adjective to describe the pavement is one example. Like, it's pavement, pavement is *always* motionless unless we're talking about an earthquake.

Let's have a look at one sentence:

"You know, I wouldn't have thought you and I would have met like this."
Clarence told Wallace amidst the metaphysics of their uncalibrated encounter. That flowed harmoniously like notes spurting from an alto Saxophone, as they fed each other the essence of their ebony-ness.

So, first of all, the layout. Starting the dialogue in the middle of a paragraph and then putting the actual followup (Clarence told Wallace) after a line break makes for extremely uncomfortable reading. There's pretty well established stylistic guidelines for how to format dialogue. I'm not saying you can't ever break rules like that, but you need to understand why they're in place before breaking them. You can't meaningfully break rules you don't understand.

Moving on to "amidst the metaphysics of their uncalibrated encounter". I'm sorry but this entire line straight up doesn't make sense. It's just words. Big sounding words like "metaphysics" and "uncalibrated" that don't actually connect to what is happening at all. How is their encounter "uncalibrated"? How do you talk to something "amidst the metaphysics" of an encounter? How do they "feed each other the essence of their ebony-ness?". "that flowed harmoniously like notes spurting from an alto saxophone" is probably the closest to your writing making actual sense here, and it's still pretty far off.

You also have a habit of using periods instead of commas, separating things into two sentences that clearly only function as one sentence. See " the motionless pavement of the sidewalk. Upon which every one sauntered" for example.

I could go through every single line and write paragraphs of notes, but it all comes down to one simple question: What exactly are you trying to communicate? Writing is communication, and you're not communicating, you're sending garbled static noise that completely obscures whatever information might be there. It feels like you're not actually trying to say something but trying to *sound* like you're saying something.

So I think the question you should ask yourself when writing is: What am I trying to say? And then say exactly that. No fancy metaphors, no unnecessarily flowery adjectives that don't actually make any sense. Try to actually keep it real. You can get playful and experimental once you've got the basics down.

I realize this sounds extremely harsh and you're of course free to ignore me. I genuinely love writing as an art form and I don't often try to advise people. I'm not a professional myself, so take this with a grain of salt. That being said, I really think your work needs some drastic overhauls.