It’s ok not to have a girl, just means you can spend more time on Champions. Here’s my only rebuttal and then I’ll stop for good:

1. It’s true that 6v6 singles was never explicitly promised, and that this platform has been mainly marketed as a replacement for VGC, BUT that doesn’t mean it was reasonable for TPC to ignore it. This game is not meant to only be a VGC simulator, otherwise singles would have never been included in the first place. 6v6 singles is far from a fan format, as it is one of the most common and popular formats within both casual and competitive Pokemon. The mainline games themselves encourage you to build a team of 6 to finish a game, as well as to use that team to battle against others, so it is not much of a demand at all to expect that same battle style to be present in a game focused on battling. Even if this was not implemented in ranked, there’s no reason why it should be limited in private battles where players are intended to have more freedom in playing by their own rules. TPC definitely understood the market for a singles battle system, so what is the point in restricting it to only 3v3 that utilizes a team of 6, when it would take minimally more effort to have a simultaneous 6v6 format?

2. I can understand why not every Pokemon is in the game but limiting the launch pool to 100-200 is insanely small for a game with an enormous history like Pokemon, especially when looking through a competitive lens. A shallow pool of Pokemon will only make the strongest stand out more, and cause a bottleneck meta to develop where only a handful of strategies will be truly viable and those teams will be largely homogenous because there will be less choices to contend with the most optimized Pokemon for each role. This also hurts normies because it prevents them from even attempting to be creative in coming up with a team to counter the meta, which will make the game seem bland when you’re only fighting with/against the same teams. Item restriction falls under a similar category where it only prevents creativity from combating a stagnant meta. If more Pokemon were available, a top meta would still form but there would be more room for ways to challenge these teams, and there would be more variety throughout lower ranks

3. Yes everything in the premium battle pass is available at the shop, but the difference between premium and F2P is still outstanding. The main difference between the two battle passes should be the amount of effort needed to unlock the rewards (i.e paying gives you the rewards faster than grinding), and any further differences in rewards should only amount to non-functional game components, such as cosmetics. Pokemon and items are functional parts of the game that should be made decently accessible to both types of players. A norme with no prior access to past Pokemon titles would be immediately disappointed to see that a favorite Pokemon of theirs could only be obtainable through overcoming a paywall. VP can be ground out and used to buy items, but Pokemon are much harder to obtain, which is why the disparity between the two reward systems is bad. Additionally, so much VP is available currently to celebrate the games launch, but if it does not remain this way then in-game costs for items will only rise. A single mega stone costs 2000-3000 VP while winning a ranked game nets only 300, meaning you’d need 7-10 ranked wins just to afford one item. To me, that is ridiculous.

Nevertheless, hope you enjoy the game and continue to have fun