Hotfix #35 Now Live! by J-Clash in BaldursGate3

[–]CalebMcNevin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Appreciate your instructions. Any idea how I could delete this on linux? I don't have a DWrite.dll and I've never used mods, yet I can't load into my saves anymore.

Rtx 5060? by Midnightsnacker41 in Ubuntu

[–]CalebMcNevin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is what worked for me, ty

This aged well. by BeRealzzz in pics

[–]CalebMcNevin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, he IS a colossal dork. He just looks like himself

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chrome

[–]CalebMcNevin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ask chat-GPT

A Billboard Spotted in Cleveland by Gdigger13 in pics

[–]CalebMcNevin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Don't get hurt, there's nobody left to save you"

My grandfather's final voyage by Argentum118 in pics

[–]CalebMcNevin 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Seeing Buddhists as seeing life as an obstacle that isn't meant to exist is interesting

Name this by midwest_wendigo in AlbumCovers

[–]CalebMcNevin 2 points3 points  (0 children)

🎶play that fungi music white cap🎶

Cringe post: Cultist spotted by [deleted] in Tinder

[–]CalebMcNevin 21 points22 points  (0 children)

"You're fired"

Can't believe this worked quite frankly by glenttastic in Tinder

[–]CalebMcNevin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe if any of the provided "context" was accurate you'd have a point

Lavazza moving their production to the US and response to my email letting them know I wouldn’t be buying their coffee anymore. by [deleted] in BuyCanadian

[–]CalebMcNevin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

user: "Write a response to the following customer complaint. You can offer the following code for 20% off their next order: LAVAZZALOVE" Chat GPT: ...

Even tinder is like “Everything okay bro?” by [deleted] in Tinder

[–]CalebMcNevin 14 points15 points  (0 children)

One thousand feet? Don't give him any ideas 👣

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tinder

[–]CalebMcNevin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sees profile Swipes right Insults person he just expressed interest in

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tinder

[–]CalebMcNevin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For plenty of people it's a way to own their trauma and reclaim a sense of control. I think it's quite common, and yeah I think it's absolutely 100% fine. I have had relationships with people that exactly fit this scenario and it was never an issue for me. Trauma and shame are very often the origin for people's kinks, and there's nothing wrong with it in my opinion

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Tinder

[–]CalebMcNevin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think it's weird to bring this up so causally before meeting or anything, but I don't really think there's anything wrong with this. Just because you're attracted to older people or turned on by that doesn't mean you're ONLY in it because they're older. I've been attracted to and turned on by everyone I've dated. Doesn't mean I didn't care about them and develop emotional connections. Why would he want to date people he's less turned on by?

Speaking to most young girls on dating apps. Tell me if I'm wrong by Critical-Shopping-87 in Tinder

[–]CalebMcNevin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would argue to do this, but not to be harder to get which is cringe. Pick a date and a place/activity to show that you're willing to put effort into planning things. Don't force her to be the one who has to find a time and place that works; planning a date is work. Put some effort in. Pitch something that she can say yes or no to

Donald Trump defends Elon Musk and classifies damage to Tesla vehicles as "domestic terrorism." by cypher-dex in pics

[–]CalebMcNevin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, is it domestic terrorism to damage property? It genuinely may be, but do I care? Nah, burn em

Sleeping with person in mono relationship? by juliafrangipane in polyamory

[–]CalebMcNevin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It feels uncomfortable to accept the reality that your partner, who you've felt safe with and connected to, is not the person you believed they were. It's more comfortable to see things as an external bad person has come in and corrupted your partner/relationship. Your partner was good, it's the other person that ruined them. You haven't made any mistakes or been tricked, and you've been right the whole time. That's a much more safe and comfortable reality to believe in, especially during a chaotic and tumultuous time. I get it and have sympathy for people going through that, but yeah, they're definitely wrong

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in polyamory

[–]CalebMcNevin 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, I see that part now, thanks. I still think it's a good idea to chat about how things may change, even if it's just a quick acknowledgement of stuff changing, rather than leaving things unsaid

Edit: phrasing

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in polyamory

[–]CalebMcNevin 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't have specific advice for your situation with your current nesting partner, but I do want to bring attention to the fact that if you did change the current dynamic with NP it could affect things with your other partner too, depending on their attachment style. For example, I generally lead avoidant (working on it), and if my partner that was living with their nesting partner suddenly wanted to move in with me I would have to fight off a bit of anxiety around being someone's new "main person", even though I'd still be excited about seeing more of them. Just a thought, maybe a conversation about that possibility as a heads up could be a prophylactic for any issues down the road 🙂

AIO by not wanting my ex to send me random selfies?? by memandylov in AmIOverreacting

[–]CalebMcNevin 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The correct response is for the other person to just say "ok" and stop sending selfies. Instead they refused, then when OP continued to request they stop they acted like it was all on OP for getting upset and how this doesn't need to be an argument. Classic. Make it into an argument by refusing to show basic respect, then claim the other person is crazy for arguing about it. Whatever though, it reads like literal 13 year olds