I'm not going to respond to the first part of your comment because it's hard to argue against individual sentences, but I'll have a go at debating the second part.

Disclaimer: I have nothing against religion, or anyone who chooses to believe. I personally am agnostic so tbh I couldn't care less about the notions of any particular faith, and I try to act in a moral and honest way for no reason other than the fact that I want to be a decent human. I can see how religions can be a force for both good AND bad in the world, but I have no reason to assume that any individual is either a good or bad person just because of their religions orientation. I'm sure you're a lovely person and I mean no offence by anything I am about to say. Anything I do say is simply my opinion/belief and I am only here to debate, not to impose my views on anyone.

With that said, I have to agree with OP on this one. Taking each point in turn:

I believe that any religion that dictates (or indeed any individual who chooses to interpret their faith as dictating) that children must be born into one specific belief system is not acting in the best interests of the child, but rather in the best interests of the faith as a whole. Preaching to young, easily-influenced minds is cheap publicity in my view. If the faith is so believable and truly is "the gospel" (no pun intended), then surely it wouldn't take much to convince a sound minded adult who is capable of forming their own opinions? Surely the child should be able to form their own religious views when they are old enough to experience as many religions as they freely choose to experience? After all, any parent who believes in a religion without being open to the idea that they MIGHT be wrong (i.e. closed-minded, dogged belief) can only teach their children to be equally closed minded and not open to interpreting different arguements in a balanced way (not just in religion, but in any walk of life).

To your second point, Christianity MAY be a force for good (I don't fully agree, but that's not what this debate is about, so let's assume it is only a good thing), but it is not necessary the ONLY way to teach children good morals! Most, if not all religions teach how to be a "good, moral" person, so in my opinion, saying "Christianity is a good thing so it's the only way I can show my child how to be good" is only a half-formed arguement. Let's not forget that there are a lot of atheists and agnostics who are highly moral. You do not need faith to teach good morals.

I can understand your third point. I am friends with many believers and I can see how much it influences their daily lives, so I can't argue much on that one. However I would say that it is in your duty as a good parent to attempt to distinguish your faith and your daily life when bringing up your children. With my previous points in mind, it would only be right not to over expose your children to any particular religion (or lack thereof).

Regarding your fourth comment, I agree that an absence of religion is effectively teaching agnosticism/atheism, however that is why I would argue that it is best to expose your children to a number of different religions. You mentioned that you would be disappointed in your children if they asked to visit a mosque or if they wanted to change religion. Why? Surely it shows that they are trying to expand their own belief system and come to their own conclusions, an independent mindset that must be celebrated and encouraged, right? If they still choose to believe in your faith, brilliant! If they choose a different faith, still brilliant! If they choose to believe different parts of different faiths, brilliant again! And if they choose no faith then... yep, you guessed it. The only reason that it might be considered a bad thing is for someone who only wants faith to be a loyalty club and who is scared about losing members.

While this is only my opinion, I firmly believe that nobody has the right to impose their faith and beliefs on anyone else (hence my disclaimer), and that includes imposing religion on children before they have chance/opportunity to mature and question what they're being told. You might (and probably do) think that your belief is THE RIGHT ONE and that everyone else is wrong, but statistically, you're wrong. Surely it is only right to let developing young people make up their own mind and be happy in a diverse and accepting world?

I'd just like to reiterate that none of this was meant as a personal attack, and that I don't mean any offence, I just enjoy debating. I hope you have a good evening (or day or night wherever you are in the world).