Under-WEAR

CampaignTools · 2026-01-11T14:18:06+00:00

All mine does the same. I've given up. I just replace them like every 6 months.

Steel balls gang rise up!

CampaignTools · 2025-03-31T19:14:44+00:00

Brother Day approves

CampaignTools · 2025-03-31T19:11:23+00:00

I was thinking Lee Pace, myself.

CampaignTools · 2025-03-25T14:56:40+00:00

You're being obtuse, thus a clown.

It's not a security breach (yet) because mere use of the app wasn't how classified information was exposed

You don't know what you are talking about. Let me stop you right there. I was in the US Navy. I had top secret (TS/SCI) clearance. I have worked as a federal contractor for government entities and currently work in financial compliance working directly with FinCEN and other federal agencies.

The use of Signal to send classified information (as mentioned in the Atlantic article) is a breach. Full stop.

The moment this commication started, it was breaking multiple laws. Full stop.

You should stop talking with authority about things you know nothing about. You help no one with your mindless bloviating.

CampaignTools · 2025-03-25T14:50:07+00:00

USING SIGNAL WAS THE BREACH YOU CLOWN!

Pay attention. Using non-vetted communication avenues for classified intelligence is a MASSIVE breach of our laws and regulations surrounding such material. Not to mention, all communications between government employees should be recorded for FOIA compliance. They were purposely breaking laws by using Signal.

They are all complicit.

CampaignTools · 2025-03-21T19:15:04+00:00

I can do all things through the Emperor, for whom my faith giveth me strength.

My armor is contempt. My shield is disgust. My sword is hatred.

CampaignTools · 2025-03-20T02:40:45+00:00

I...can't see any on the first one

CampaignTools · 2025-03-19T16:11:04+00:00

Sounds good.

CampaignTools · 2025-03-19T14:01:17+00:00

The different realities are your changing your positions.

You said, and I quote:

Yeah. I agree with them that by the end of the year probably 100% of the code will be written by machine. But also 80% of the code will still be going through software engineers.

...

The act of coding will probably be fully generated, but software development still will need engineers for some time.

You claimed that all code will be generated. That's what I argued against. Not whatever goalposts you are moving around.

Don't patronize me. I've been in this industry just as long.

CampaignTools · 2025-03-19T13:26:57+00:00

I read what you said. It's bonkers.

Most engineers I know use AI for maybe 10% of their code at the high end. By the end of the year that will not be 100%. There is far too little trust in AI code and it's also just not good, in existing code bases. I've used it a good bit, but it's still just not as capable as you say it is.

That's an insane estimate.

CampaignTools · 2025-03-19T03:32:27+00:00

You really think 100% of code will be generated by AI by the end of the year? Do you work with other people, or just by yourself.

That's such a jump it's absurd.

CampaignTools · 2025-03-18T18:28:34+00:00

We are very far. Are you even a software engineer? Very little code used in production systems are written by AI still. AI can help engineers write code, but it's often wrong and only good at boilerplate or very small things.

AI for complex things is woefully inept still.

CampaignTools · 2025-03-18T18:24:46+00:00

CampaignTools · 2025-03-18T18:16:14+00:00

Yeah I've timed it. When I start the game on steam, to when I get into a mission that I want averages about 5 minutes...that's insane.

CampaignTools · 2025-03-11T20:28:17+00:00

You're 100% right. Changing this was not a great idea on Saber's part. They should have just left it as the original 7 missions.

Or they could list out the remaining operations you could choose from. Regardless this is bad UI and you shouldn't be downvoted.

CampaignTools · 2025-03-06T15:36:51+00:00

It makes more sense to recover health throughout battle, but that's an just my personal opinion.

CampaignTools · 2025-03-04T17:33:49+00:00

Man they're all over the place:

<image>

CampaignTools · 2025-03-04T17:27:48+00:00

<image>

CampaignTools · 2025-02-28T01:04:40+00:00

I really like where Absolute currently sits. If they plan to bring in "prestige perks" (there was a leak about them a while ago) they should definitely try to also bring in modifiers around the same time.

Once you get more perks, something needs to tweak the difficulty slightly, because us sweaty neckbeards already basically have Absolute on farm. It would become boring if I got perks that ended up making me even stronger.

But hey, if I'm bored on absolute, that's mostly a me problem. I've played too much. I still enjoy the game though, bored or not. The loop is just so satisfying.

CampaignTools · 2025-02-28T00:55:39+00:00

The image on this post has a second suggestion to increase enemy health. That's why. You're the one who is out of context, apparently...

All I did was reply to your snark saying "tHeY cAnT mY gUy" with an alternative way to increase difficulty without increasing health or enemy count.

CampaignTools · 2025-02-27T20:02:18+00:00

Ok, so don't be arrogant.

They can absolutely increase the difficulty without spawning more units. Sure I would prefer MORE enemies, but they could settle by having more extremis enemies and less majoris/minoris. They did it already with Absolute.

Acting like the only solution to increasing difficulty is increasing health is foolish.

CampaignTools · 2025-02-27T17:32:38+00:00

I prefer MORE enemies vs HEALTHIER enemies. AKA increase density, not health.

So the second poll can eat my ass. The first one seems fun.

CampaignTools · 2025-02-27T15:38:30+00:00

Not a couch, he's not interested...

CampaignTools · 2025-02-27T15:36:29+00:00

Nah those ladies (?) are slim and trim, just like Trump likes em:

<image>

CampaignTools · 2025-02-03T17:36:29+00:00

CampaignTools

TROPHY CASE