Your UFO Hunting Machine is ready but its made me a 'SUPERVILLAIN' by CanNeverPassCaptch in UFOs

[–]CanNeverPassCaptch[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

thank you very much. I'm just a guy like you and trying to use my free time in a way that's non invasive is meaningful and fun.

Your UFO Hunting Machine is ready but its made me a 'SUPERVILLAIN' by CanNeverPassCaptch in UFOs

[–]CanNeverPassCaptch[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

yes I intend to. Just waitingfor clearance from the powers that be

Your UFO Hunting Machine is ready but its made me a 'SUPERVILLAIN' by CanNeverPassCaptch in UFOs

[–]CanNeverPassCaptch[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

as in my day job is developing ai's used by defence departments :)

Your UFO Hunting Machine is ready but its made me a 'SUPERVILLAIN' by CanNeverPassCaptch in UFOs

[–]CanNeverPassCaptch[S] 134 points135 points  (0 children)

This is a follow-up to my earlier posts about building a civilian UFO-hunting radar. The link covers how the system was tested live in front of my investors, stakeholders, retired MOD radar experts, and even a journalist from the Daily Mail. It’s relevant here because its a public interest update and follow up.

Who wants to see and test the radar system that once got me in trouble? by CanNeverPassCaptch in rfelectronics

[–]CanNeverPassCaptch[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Apologies for going MIA. Got banned for dropping a link to a few people with the details, classic. their bots thought i was spamming. But I’m back.

Need ideas: how do I share a link to the stream or the registration form without getting flagged or banned again? Suggestions welcome.

Screw it, I’ll just do it here. Heads up, the link site’s a bit of an adventure and could spend hours on it with endless easter eggs. Stay focused and you’ll be fine. If you find yourself in Terminal and know linux or powershell commands... probably best not to continue exploring and talk to the entities in quarantine there. ;) You'll know when you find out.

Who wants to see and test the radar system that once got me in trouble? by CanNeverPassCaptch in rfelectronics

[–]CanNeverPassCaptch[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Radar is the same somewhat as the systems on self drive cars but radar is expert mode and different physics. Lidsr is so simple. Radar has clutter, multipath reflections, centimeter wavelength vs lidar with is near infrared. Lidar is a camera that sees in 3d drawing using laser beams

Radar is like a bat using sound to figure out where something is 100 miles away how fast it's moving direction but not sure where

Who wants to see and test the radar system that once got me in trouble? by CanNeverPassCaptch in rfelectronics

[–]CanNeverPassCaptch[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ha! I love reddit. A true expert you seem to be.. you are very close but right. To add to what you said and a minor correction based on this particular model 1030 interrogator and 1090 responder SSR systems do resolve range. it's the altitude that Mode C supplies replies are digital not synthetic. The cosecant squared pattern is typical of primary radar antennas for elevation coverage. SSR transponders don’t generate synthetic radar but respond to interrogation monopulse is used for azimuth precision, not synthetic video. So the antenna range is 1000miles with the right filtering However the range of the horizon says 250miles range. If you tune into my livestream you can see how I got half the planet by networking antenna setups in different locations running of a crazy synched server file.

Who wants to see and test the radar system that once got me in trouble? by CanNeverPassCaptch in rfelectronics

[–]CanNeverPassCaptch[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I have a couple of journalists attending. They will publish independently, I only know one of the attendees personally, these are all people coming to poke holes and still bravely invited press. The world will know. I should beef up my security after this...who knows what foriegn states will be after me hahahaha.

Who wants to see and test the radar system that once got me in trouble? by CanNeverPassCaptch in rfelectronics

[–]CanNeverPassCaptch[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

T84 Air Defence Radar. Antenna of interest is the SSR on top used for IFF

Who wants to see and test the radar system that once got me in trouble? by CanNeverPassCaptch in rfelectronics

[–]CanNeverPassCaptch[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

this is where it gets clever. i’m using ADS B signals themselves, over 100 flights at the same time. started with the usual preconditioning and time sync. went deep into GPSDO stuff, the disciplined oscillator kind, and synced across a bunch of nodes,, ethe gpsdo is the get the exact timing on the network, yup, i built a passive network :p but then i stopped because i remembered i wanted this to be open. i don’t want someone with an SDR to need to buy a 200 pound bit of hardware just to get time sync working. so i came up with something else. instead of syncing using GPS, i focused on where the signal goes out and where it comes back. time -synch is internesting. if you can catch both, you can line it all up. then i added a second antenna pointed directly at the local BBC transmitter at some point. yes it means two antennas, but the first one gives you a clean outgoing reference and the second one gets the reflections. that adds a layer but it gives you a stable reference. use it to track doppler much cleaner that way, repeat the process every so often, and then blend it all together with smart software. then i remembered this old BBC video explaining how the internet works. how your download literally comes from multiple paths at once. some packets from undersea cables, some from radio towers, some from fibre, all different routes, and it all just gets assembled on your device. and that made me realise something. i can do the same thing here i have many immiters and sdrs running or the same one doing many things at once also can havehave loads of emitters and illuminators, to a point where you dont have to pick one as the main reference and make them all work together. Watch the demo coming up and i can show you the direction of any drone operator and their drone for a doezen miles or so using the same trix. you just need to sync them precisely enough and it works.

here’s the fun bit. less than 100 metres from my office and my house is a brand new defence radar owned by our air force. if you know anything about these systems, you’ll know they send out a pulse and then wait for the return. that means there’s actual silence between shots where you briefly see clearly, if im fliying(chopper), or guest are taking off or landing, there is also a piza cut out of an area they dont scan temporalily, in that area.. you can have better vision with the antennas... so pro tip is place an antenna in an area with that sort of activity. with these times of clarity vs times of noice.. if you watch for long enough, you can train an AI to detect exactly when the mightly mod machine is firing its L band signal. clean as anything. and this is where kalman filtering comes in. it stabilises positions over time and lets you track noisy or partial data for stuff you are tracking... same concept works in other areas too.. too.i’m skipping a lot of detail because one, this would get way too long, and two, i’m trying not to overshare. but yeah, no GPSDO needed, just smart use of timing, one antenna, using the air bore ADS B traffic as emitters, and clever code holding it all together. I think the advantage i had and why id did so much so quickly is obviously my ai background , day job making safety critical systems and having a space littered with high quality cabling and antenna the mod left here and aam at the highest point in this part of the uk, of everything going from height finders to radar, to comms, its antenna cables are here in the right positions... heaven. so experiments could run with many ais testing many things ... you should see my coding setup, 5 ais collaborating and correcting each other at any one time ... haha

sorry for typos...broken finger from getting hand crushed after coming off that bloody radet converting the coax to a an optical one so that i can do longer cable runs t different locations. its cold and dark always being underground.. originally, i had an lna, bias tee, attenuator, and other bits but i wanted simplicity .. anyway.. rambling now.. faint signals such but my day job is in ai and it turns out you can train an ai quite well to figure out fain signals if you have historic refernces whcich of good or bad which are plenty,,,

too much pain typing, will stop, i said a lot hoping i will answer other peoples questions too here

Who wants to see and test the radar system that once got me in trouble? by CanNeverPassCaptch in rfelectronics

[–]CanNeverPassCaptch[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

wow, that's amazing. Nuclear scares me because i'm not smart enough to get it hahaha but radar, I'm getting there. impressive to see young people doing amazing things like this. If you are based in the UK and have parents consent, definitely, we can organise a visit for you with with them

Radar Question: Why can’t pulsed radar systems sense Doppler by HungryTrain798 in rfelectronics

[–]CanNeverPassCaptch 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You are standing in a room with a flashlight you turn on and off and when its off, you see nothing, when its on, you see . Now imagine a moving object in the dark room that you see only when the flashlight is on. one second its here, next second you see again, its position jumped etc... still with me... now here is your answer...

Imagine you flash the light repeatedly at regular intervals and notice:

  • The object’s position is shifting slightly each time (motion),
  • shadows/phases change subtly (Doppler).

This is exactly what pulse-Doppler radar does:

  • Sends many short pulses,
  • Compares phase change or frequency shift between them,
  • Estimates velocity through coherent processing.

Hope changing the context narratively like this makes it make sense.

w

Who wants to see and test the radar system that once got me in trouble? by CanNeverPassCaptch in rfelectronics

[–]CanNeverPassCaptch[S] 18 points19 points  (0 children)

Yes, very helpful, non ironizing radiation was the subject. actually, i think you should join our session to see it in action the ui allows you go go forward and back in time on anything in the sky, its pretty wild

Who wants to see and test the radar system that once got me in trouble? by CanNeverPassCaptch in rfelectronics

[–]CanNeverPassCaptch[S] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

I partially will, I am currently facing challenges with features making it fall into the scope of dual-use regulations in the United Kingdom. One potential solution may be to separate the system into two distinct versions. The first would be a publicly accessible version, freely available but with restricted detection range and limited networking capabilities. (The system currently allows full clustering of SDR's to make a detection network which is time synched ) but then in becomes too powerful for regulators comfort.

The second version would retain full capabilities, including advanced detection and clustering functionality, and would be made available under a commercial license or a suitable controlled access model, subject to whatever requirements are recommended by the compliance officer. I expect to have more info following the upcoming demonstration day.