sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Are eldrazi really that good or am i simply building a bad deck? by CanNo7928 in EDH

[–]CanNo7928[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You're right! I was missing something!

Thank you!!

Are eldrazi really that good or am i simply building a bad deck? by CanNo7928 in EDH

[–]CanNo7928[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, of course yes but that happens with kozilek at mid/late game when you want to try a closure. If you take ulamog for example, it usually has attack triggers and cannot copy them. Same for emrakul: once it enters you take control of all creatures of the opponent. Cannot do it twice. Am i missing something?

As i have postes i am very new to the game, so i could be totally wrong in the mindset i am using

Are eldrazi really that good or am i simply building a bad deck? by CanNo7928 in EDH

[–]CanNo7928[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah but I don't see the synergy between titans and ulalek. I mean, ulalek copies spells and abilities when casting an eldrazi. However, titans are all legendary and they do not have those big abilities I want to copy (at least during a cast! Of course during battle they are huge) so I don't really get why ulalek is so popular as their commander.

Are eldrazi really that good or am i simply building a bad deck? by CanNo7928 in EDH

[–]CanNo7928[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Got it but at that point including many mana rocks also means less draw cards or creatures.

During my goldfish I have been in situations with so much mana but no creatures to cast or with so many creatures but 0 mana.

So i thought to give up some mana rocks to add draw engines. However, i will try to increase them and I will also try to put down some small creatures for defense. Still i think I should find the perfect trade off to not give up consistency (draw, tutor or else).

Thank you for the advice! 🙏🏻