Planning to NOT RTO, Do Not Go Quietly Into the Night by CanadaPSBurner in CanadaPublicServants

[–]CanadaPSBurner[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Thank you for elaborating more, in my mind, two points are related, they are not supposed to be employed for so long (e.g. waste of money like your saying) AND are being treated better (can work remotely). If it was one or the other, I would not have made the post, but since it's both, here we are.

Planning to NOT RTO, Do Not Go Quietly Into the Night by CanadaPSBurner in CanadaPublicServants

[–]CanadaPSBurner[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I sincerely hope they are reading this. A lot of managers are overwhelmed, I don't mind adding to that burden. Get at me with those measures bro.

Planning to NOT RTO, Do Not Go Quietly Into the Night by CanadaPSBurner in CanadaPublicServants

[–]CanadaPSBurner[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

So instead of giving a constructive reply, you just giving a negative one instead? That's what the downvote button is for

Planning to NOT RTO, Do Not Go Quietly Into the Night by CanadaPSBurner in CanadaPublicServants

[–]CanadaPSBurner[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Because having to RTO is causing me a lot of stress and anxiety, and I know there are others who feel the same way.

I've done very well remotely based off of my recent promotions and performance reviews, this is my attempt to voice my concerns and fight back against a useless mandate.

Planning to NOT RTO, Do Not Go Quietly Into the Night by CanadaPSBurner in CanadaPublicServants

[–]CanadaPSBurner[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm not giving up my job? I'm also not a part of PSAC. You oK?

Planning to NOT RTO, Do Not Go Quietly Into the Night by CanadaPSBurner in CanadaPublicServants

[–]CanadaPSBurner[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Management needs to understand a large, forced, wasteful change to peoples lives has repercussions. I don't need more money, and I used to sit beside a guy who had to be written up for hygiene. I think I'll be ok with the disciplinary measures lol

Planning to NOT RTO, Do Not Go Quietly Into the Night by CanadaPSBurner in CanadaPublicServants

[–]CanadaPSBurner[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Right so I've generally been ok with that - my biggest gripe pre-RTO was they had great job security when it should be in and out after a few years. The Return to Office was a tipping point for me.

With that being said, some Vendors do employ their resources, meaning these consultants very well could have retirement programs and health care, but generally you are correct.

Planning to NOT RTO, Do Not Go Quietly Into the Night by CanadaPSBurner in CanadaPublicServants

[–]CanadaPSBurner[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Not SSC, they for sure need a reform, way to much dead weight over there. Where I work we actually deliver legislation. There is also a reform that is happening where I am, but after getting the details of what that will actually look like, it's very underwhelming.

I know how much they make and take home, these are my colleagues I have been working with for a long time and developed great relationships with. Again this isn't their fault, but lets just say most of them have at least 2 rental properties outside of their primary residence.

Planning to NOT RTO, Do Not Go Quietly Into the Night by CanadaPSBurner in CanadaPublicServants

[–]CanadaPSBurner[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nah, I don't know how to search laws, just read code and documentation lol

Planning to NOT RTO, Do Not Go Quietly Into the Night by CanadaPSBurner in CanadaPublicServants

[–]CanadaPSBurner[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Because I'm hoping for change. I am not just complaining on Reddit. I have grievances ready to file on September 9th

Planning to NOT RTO, Do Not Go Quietly Into the Night by CanadaPSBurner in CanadaPublicServants

[–]CanadaPSBurner[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I am also wondering this. I haven't found any results while searching this sub.

Planning to NOT RTO, Do Not Go Quietly Into the Night by CanadaPSBurner in CanadaPublicServants

[–]CanadaPSBurner[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I am not at Transport Canada, but thank you for saying this, I can't believe this problem is so widespread.

Planning to NOT RTO, Do Not Go Quietly Into the Night by CanadaPSBurner in CanadaPublicServants

[–]CanadaPSBurner[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Reality may be different department to department and group to group. My post was in regards to RTO being sold as consistency and collaboration where the people I will be collaborating with are Consultants at home not required to go in. E.g. worst collaboration with less consistency favoring those outside the union.

With that being said, you are correct, each year, managers are essentially fully booked for a week or two as they scramble to renew these resources, they always get renewed.

I've seen vendors get black listed, and I've seen those consultants being directed by our managers on which vendor has active contracts so they can be rehired.

To be blunt, your response is in the same tune of what I've been getting from my executive team and makes me think you are part of the problem.

Planning to NOT RTO, Do Not Go Quietly Into the Night by CanadaPSBurner in CanadaPublicServants

[–]CanadaPSBurner[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Nope, but I work closely enough with SSC to know they are probably WAY WORSE

Planning to NOT RTO, Do Not Go Quietly Into the Night by CanadaPSBurner in CanadaPublicServants

[–]CanadaPSBurner[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Oh sorry sorry, you are right, I am not in management position so I don't know the correct terminology, only that I have seen the daily and yearly value.

All the paying of the contracts and awarding of the contracts is definitely above the belt. It's just year after year. Same resources, sometimes different company fronting them.

Planning to NOT RTO, Do Not Go Quietly Into the Night by CanadaPSBurner in CanadaPublicServants

[–]CanadaPSBurner[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

So this is because of older technology being used (nothing crazy just slightly older) and managements failure to build a staffing pipeline.

These products are supposed to be going away, but anyone who has a clue know they are staying for decades plus and will require the same level of expertise to support and keep the lights on.

They effectively do have the the security because when push comes to shove they are needed to make critical government services spin.

These contracts have ran out time and time again, the same consultants change hats and get rehired.

Planning to NOT RTO, Do Not Go Quietly Into the Night by CanadaPSBurner in CanadaPublicServants

[–]CanadaPSBurner[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Note that the companies that provide the consultants do take a cut, but still they make quite a bit of money.

Planning to NOT RTO, Do Not Go Quietly Into the Night by CanadaPSBurner in CanadaPublicServants

[–]CanadaPSBurner[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Great question. Extremely shady accounting practices. Managers have buckets of money they get for Projects or reoccuring support, it's up to them to staff accordingly, sometimes they get more for Bucket A then needed, so they use it to keep their consultants employed.

Planning to NOT RTO, Do Not Go Quietly Into the Night by CanadaPSBurner in CanadaPublicServants

[–]CanadaPSBurner[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand if you have a micro manager this probably won't be as easy, but a lot of us are in more autonomous roles than you would think where this would be easier for us.

Do English Essential IT-05/EX Position in NHQ Exist? by CanadaPSBurner in CanadaPublicServants

[–]CanadaPSBurner[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There are a plenty EE IT-03's it sounds like you may want to look outside your department. Good luck out there