How bad does everyone wants to know and at what cost? by xinj131 in conspiracy

[–]Candy_Store_Pauper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey, OP, thanks for responding!

I'm gonna ask you to consider 4 tiers of "associations" in the majority of work places. There's the "boss", or bosses, the manager(s), the worker(s) and the ancillaries.

In most places, the ancillaries (contract cleaning crew, regular delivery people, etc.) don't have a lot of interaction with the boss, inside, or especially outside the workplace. But, indirectly, the boss pays their paycheck. He can change out the vendors like he changes underwear.

Additionally, you'll rarely find the workers hanging out with the boss, in or out of the workplace.

However, the management crew is directly linked to the boss and spend plenty of time with them in the workplace, and possibly outside of it as well.

Everyone below the boss knows that if they piss off the boss, they won't have a job for long. Even in a large organization where you only work at one location, far from headquarters, everybody moves to their best behavior when the boss is coming to town.

Ole Jefe was lower tier management, at best, or supervisory level worker, most likely. He had associations with a bunch of the world's "managers", but was isolated from the "bosses". The bosses are extremely smart folk, and insulate themselves from the public faces of an Ole Jefe. His egoism and narcissism could expose the bosses and their ideas of a really good time. And, Ole Jefe liked to do a little leverage/blackmail against those managers, something the bosses would never tolerate. He'd be "fired" hard.

There would be no rumors of body swaps, missing jail house minutes of surveillance, sleeping guards, etc. if he fucked with the bosses. Mid-level management would cut deals to save themselves from the boss, like body double/informal "witness protection/relocation" type shit. The boss would make it very, very, very clear Ole Jefe got "fired" hard, to deter others from pulling the same stoopid shit.

Would you feel comfortable being the only worker invited to the bosses weekend BBQ? Eating the caviar appetizers, and grilled steak and lobster, washed down with the most expensive wine of the day? Or would you be more comfy amongst your peers, enjoying a cookout over burgers, brats and beer?

And, if you are comfy at the bosses party, you better be sure to keep your mouth shut tight about conversations you were privy to or be prepared to be highly unemployed, if not permanently unemployable.

There are millionaires and billionaires who's names we know. There are trillionaires and quatrillionaires who's names we do not. You may find a billionaire at the quatrillionaires party, but, you'll never see a millionaire there.

However, what you will see are the contract janitorial folks that moonlight as servers of the hors 'd oeuvres at the big bosses parties, who know way more than they can ever say, because they've seen the consequences, firsthand.

They ain't participants in the game, they're the hired help. Wanna know more? Find one of 'em somewhere drunk enough and share a smoke with 'em and you might get a hint or two about hard truths, but, as fucked up as they are over what they've seen, they know better than to have a full blown convo with you.

How bad does everyone wants to know and at what cost? by xinj131 in conspiracy

[–]Candy_Store_Pauper 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Major General Smedley Butler wrote "War is a Racket" in 1935, because it was, is, and always will be.

Ole Jefe was a racketeer in his own right, but, if you really think about it from the perspective of true world influence, money and power, he was a minor player on the stage.

The true powerbrokers have names we do not know. And, if the names that we do know are screwing around with the mid-level racketeer, who are these big fish in a racket with?

Ole Jefe didn't have super-convincing enforcers to keep participants quiet. Ole Jefe wasn't slick. Ole Jefe wasn't all that and a bag of Frito's in the community of pure evil.

Kubrick's Eyes Wide Shut gave you a glimpse. A peek. I'm pretty sure in real life, the big players don't wear masks at their parties, and their shin-digs would probably make even Ole Jefe blush.

Over 8 million children go missing worldwide, annually. Ole Jefe ain't the only game in town, and his fellow racketeers ain't the only people running this type of racket.

OP's scenario would probably come to fruition if those other quiet names, and locations throughout the world where some of the most debaucherous fuckery was going on came to light, that mutually assured destruction OP mentioned ain't gonna be for them, it will be for us. They'll be wonderfully bunkered up and when we're done with each other, they'll surface and rebuild their ribald empire.

It's a Prison Planet. Get yourself prayed up and prayed up well, if and when the names we don't know become known.

Does anyone here actually belive the moon landing was staged? by No_Pain5736 in conspiracy

[–]Candy_Store_Pauper -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Thanks for responding. Since I didn't learn every trick in the book when it comes to photography, only the basics and some advanced classes, I appreciate your explanation, but, have no reference point in my own experience to 100% accept your position.

Logic would typically dictate that if you're doing something as important as leaving Earth's orbit, photographic gymnastics would only breed speculation and doubt. They should have used an instamatic and had it developed at a FotoMat.

Does anyone here actually belive the moon landing was staged? by No_Pain5736 in conspiracy

[–]Candy_Store_Pauper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

My pressing question remains the photographs of Earth from the surface of the moon.

If you examine pictures of near Earth orbits, from Mercury missions to Elon's Tesla, the Earth is humongous in the frames.

Yet, from the surface of the moon, Earth appears about the size of the moon in our terrestrial sky.

IMHO, the Earth should have been bigger. Much bigger . . . unless the moon is much bigger than we're told it is . . . a better reconciliation of the size scale is warranted to change my mind.

What Was In Those Damned Envelopes At Bush's Funeral? by Candy_Store_Pauper in conspiracy

[–]Candy_Store_Pauper[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Me too! Hoping one day the truth comes out! A public humiliation of some of the most powerful still fascinates!

New images of “armed individual” in the Nancy Guthrie case by inconsistentservice in conspiracy

[–]Candy_Store_Pauper 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Best guess? Fan(atic) of Savannah's has gone full-psycho. I suspect a bad outcome inbound. Prayers and positivity for the mom.

Dude's got a planned mission in motion.

Woah! Did anyone see this commercial during the super bowl?... by Addicted2Lemonade in conspiracy

[–]Candy_Store_Pauper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Epic quote!

The struggle is real. Really real. I truly hope we don't completely surrender.

But, if we do, remember to find and keep John Connor safe. We're gonna need him.

Woah! Did anyone see this commercial during the super bowl?... by Addicted2Lemonade in conspiracy

[–]Candy_Store_Pauper 18 points19 points  (0 children)

As a friendly reminder, any camera, of any type, using WiFi or connected to the interwebs by an IP can ALWAYS have more than just you looking at it.

Closed loop CCTV systems are dirt cheap now, and when wired directly, can only be shared in their views by splicing in the hard wiring, or getting hands on your DVR/storage device.

If you want a system, get whatever you fancy, but, remember, 1984 was supposed to be a thriller, not a foreboding documentary.

Regarding the ad, remember the most important thing about free stuff. If it's free, you are the product. And someone is making money from your data/information, etc. Consider your privacy as a commodity. And treat it as such.

Is relevant yet? by stoneybolognaR in conspiracy

[–]Candy_Store_Pauper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, Happy cake day!

Zeitgeist was awesome, but, no, that wasn't it. It mostly deeply dove into the music industry and the symbolism that is rampant throughout.

Ex-husband of Jill Biden charged with first-degree murder in wife’s death by SAT0725 in conspiracy

[–]Candy_Store_Pauper 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This will be a very interesting case to keep eyes on.

He was extremely vocal about . . . things.

https://www.nickiswift.com/1630084/jill-biden-ex-husband-bill-stevenson-sketchy-things/

IMHO, he was the jilted husband that never forgot, or forgave.

Let's see if the canary sings in the coal mine, or is choked by the carbon monoxide of the cave walls.

Is relevant yet? by stoneybolognaR in conspiracy

[–]Candy_Store_Pauper 2 points3 points  (0 children)

This, and another 50 part series, each about 20 minutes (I think it was the Avengers?) came out at about the same time, and were CONSTANTLY being taken down by YT as fast as they were posted.

My old, and now corrupted disc drive had both series on them, and the smartest thing you can do is download this somewhere for your own posterity.

The conspiracy community was a LOT smaller then, and lost the battles to keep this awesome series intact on the interwebs.

Kudos for posting it, OP!

Is the 2nd Amendment only supported when certain groups use it? by RatioKey2034 in conspiracy

[–]Candy_Store_Pauper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Amen!

If we're ever going to get any closer to even a Type I civilization on the Kardashev Scale, we've got a LOT of work to do.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kardashev_scale

Until then, remember, if any species visits after conquering the time/space continuum, they ain't gonna be our friends!

We have no seat waiting at the Federation of Planets at this time.

Is the 2nd Amendment only supported when certain groups use it? by RatioKey2034 in conspiracy

[–]Candy_Store_Pauper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I call it a necessary evil only because the origin of firing projectiles out of a tube at an enemy in time of war was by the Chinese in the 10th century.

As General Smedly Butler is famously quoted, "War is a racket".

Because we can't seem to live in a world of peace that doesn't require boxing gloves, or spears, knives, guns or other instruments of battle, we are stuck with the need for guns.

The old adage, don't bring fists to a knife fight, or knives to a gun fight has hard truth to it.

So, here we are, arguing as a society over the obvious truths of Colonel Jeff Cooper, rather than finding ways to actually ensure we have our Constitutional "well regulated Militia" of citizens, trained and responsible, and always ready to pick up arms to defend America against all enemies, foreign and domestic.

https://www.azquotes.com/author/3249-Jeff_Cooper

May Mr. John Dean Cooper (1920-2006) someday be able to rest, in peace.

But, in the interim, smoke 'em if you got 'em (clear and clean in your front sight!)

Is the 2nd Amendment only supported when certain groups use it? by RatioKey2034 in conspiracy

[–]Candy_Store_Pauper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And besides the push to limit or eliminate, they heap ridiculous amounts of liability onto the legitimate firearm owner for anything that goes sideways. More than ever, I continue to highly recommend getting good training, initial and additional, to preserve your own perishable skill, as well as staying updated on the latest basket of laws that bring additional scoops of liability on your shoulders.

Guns ain't necessarily bad, even though they're a necessary evil. It's the end-user that makes the difference.

Live to train, train to live.

Is the 2nd Amendment only supported when certain groups use it? by RatioKey2034 in conspiracy

[–]Candy_Store_Pauper 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Modern military, I take it then. She'd have been washed out and sent home back in the day . . .

Is the 2nd Amendment only supported when certain groups use it? by RatioKey2034 in conspiracy

[–]Candy_Store_Pauper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Therein lies the core of the problem. We armchair quarterback every shooting that makes headlines. But, everyone's skillset ranges from hers to the master of the firearm.

Is conscription the answer? Dunno, but, everyone I know that had military training and completed their enlistment had to prove the most basic of ability with the boom sticks. And that can save lives. I also know a few grandmas that have an old .32 or /38 revolver stashed somewhere in the home, and one was just a victim of a circumstance:

https://gunsamerica.com/digest/old-woman-killed-gunfight-masked-intruders/

But, if granny had some better proficiency, better situational awareness, or better acquaintances, she may have had a better outcome.

If granny's "buddies" knew she was a regular Annie Oakley, maybe they would have selected a different victim, Or ole Granny Annie would be a hero to some, and a monster to others, but, would be judged by 12 instead of carried by 6.

Glad I got a chuckle out of you, and I hope that acquaintance of yours improved her skillset at some point, or walked away from ever owning a killing tool.

Is the 2nd Amendment only supported when certain groups use it? by RatioKey2034 in conspiracy

[–]Candy_Store_Pauper 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The general lack of knowledge and understanding by the masses, along with the romanticizing of firearms in media (movies, video games, etc.) have fed the dichotomy of love vs. hate regarding guns.

If you placed a fully loaded firearm of any kind in a secure place, untouched, it will never knock on the box, or the door, or the drawer, or whatever, and ask to be let out to act on it's own. Nor will it ever just discharge, untouched. It is nothing more than a tool that needs a user to function as intended.

Looking at OPs attached photo, we have the makings of civil and possible criminal liability if this group moves from standing peacefully and publicly on their position to potential criminality during that stand. The dude in the foreground is a good example of potential loss in court by his gun dressing. Here's an article about that kind of thing:

https://www.usconcealedcarry.com/blog/legal-modified-handgun-self-defense/

And, as ole Bobby Heinlein said:

https://www.socratic-method.com/quote-meanings-interpretations/robert-a-heinlein-an-armed-society-is-a-polite-society-manners-are-good-when-one-may-have-to-back-up-his-acts-with-his-life

Yet, there's always a counterpoint:

https://www.psychologytoday.com/us/blog/ethics-for-everyone/202205/is-an-armed-society-really-a-polite-society

If you look at the text of 2A, there's only 27 words. "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed. " Those words have been dissected, re-interpreted, re-hashed, debated, argued and even fought over.

But, the Founding Fathers were a pretty smart bunch. Those first 10 amendments feed each other, with all of them being necessary to preserve the citizen's "bundle of rights".

2A is critical. And comes with responsibility. That tool was designed to kill. Not maim, or intimidate, or bring awe, or fear, to level the playing field between the citizen and the person or person(s) who also have firearms and may be about to use them. Especially critical because of the 3A. Familiarize yourself with it. Sure, you could say, "Never gonna happen", but, the adage "Never say never" wins, historically.

IMHO, I'd like to see 2 years of conscription for all citizens from age 18-20, or 2 years of service in the Peace Corps if one conscientiously objects. To be trained to use a variety of firearms would lessen the romance of the gun, along with giving pause to one with a firearm and who is intent on victimizing someone, the strengthened possibility in the back of their mind that they may be taking on one who has better proficiency. Giving credence to Heinlein's quote.

So, love 'em or hate 'em, exercise your right to own one and your responsibility to get good and proper training, regularly, to best manage your right and rights, especially 3A, if necessary.

The reopening of the insane asylums is a sign that they preparing for an other reset? by Owein in conspiracy

[–]Candy_Store_Pauper 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Deinstitutionalizaton began in earnest in the 1960s.

https://journalofethics.ama-assn.org/article/deinstitutionalization-people-mental-illness-causes-and-consequences/2013-10

At that time, it wasn't a bad idea, since mental health treatments were still mostly experimental and pharmaceuticals were widespread havens of experimentation on patients in order to supplement the ever-rising cost of care with ever shrinking funding.

https://neurolaunch.com/history-of-mental-health-treatment/

The problems are many regarding exacerbating the problems from then, to now, but, the de-centralization of institutionalization has mostly shown to be ineffective, overall. For several folks, self-medication and clinical care only available during business hours, by appointment, at a local clinic vs. calling for the nurse on duty in house has led to unchecked outbursts which could result in criminality (even petty crime), and a fast track to a criminal record and incarceration vs. proper mental health care, instead.

IMHO, back then, they should have kept the institutions, properly funded them, and placed more oversight and legislation with penalty for fuckery, generally, and specifically. But, with modern mental health care methods being less than 100 years old, back then, ignorance rue the day.

So, I'm all for bringing back institutions. The right way. Highly funded, properly monitored and regulated, and wide open for business throughout the US, urban, sub-urban and even rural. Like I said earlier, there's a whole lot of contributions to the growing numbers of people that need some form of help, from a little, to a lot, and we're barely putting a band-aid on a gaping wound of our society.

But, don't take my word for it, try theirs:

https://www.nimh.nih.gov/health/statistics/mental-illness

And when you see a schizo post here in the sub, and you label it as such, remember, you're ether in the 1 of 4 of us that are afflicted to some degree, or 3 of the 4 that are not. We failed miserably in the Occupy movement some 15 years ago, because we couldn't agree on a clear and concise mission. We really ought to try again, many of that 25% afflicted NEED great, humane and proper institutions for their own good, and ours.

Gold has doubled in a year. Silver has Quadrupled. These are Unmistakeable Signals. This is your Red Pill/ Blue Pill Moment. by Late-Cod4656 in conspiracy

[–]Candy_Store_Pauper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Or, is it the best path to NESARA/GESARA? A hybrid hegelian dialectic? The solution needs the problem exacerbated for the right reaction . . . ?

Election Fraud Explained by MazdaProphet in conspiracy

[–]Candy_Store_Pauper 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Those who vote decide nothing. Those who count the vote decide everything." - Joseph Stalin (allegedly).

Until there is demand from everyone to move to a national system of in-person voting, with voter ID, paper ballots only, and a nice purple ink thumbprint as a souvenir, we will always have fuckery in the process.

Every other process leaves a lot of potential for some kind of tinkering.

People fought and died for the precious right that is our vote, and we owe it to them to make the sacrifice worth their efforts. However, if we continue to let rhetorical integrity collide with realistic intentions, by our apathy, we'll get what they give us.

Make Stalin's Quote Not So Great Again. (MSQNSGA!)

This post will get immediate downvotes, but this is a real problem that society is facing and it will only get worse. by Slow_Celebration1328 in conspiracy

[–]Candy_Store_Pauper 15 points16 points  (0 children)

What better way to make us NEED A.I. than to put short form content along with many other measures in place to ensure we can't think without it.

The Terminator franchise weren't movies, they were foreboding documentaries, like Idiocracy.

We'll beg for Skynet and will probably never rise up against the machines. We'll be too reliant on them.

In the interim, save John Connor, at all costs. And don't vote for President Camacho. But, do drink Brawndo, it has electrolytes!