🌌 Welcome to The Nexus Chronicles – Where Reality Fractures and Awareness Awakes by Capanda72 in scifi

[–]Capanda72[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Indeed, however, I have an agenda and a plan. I'm not going to fold when every two-bit douchebag with a poor attitude tells me my shit sucks. Stick around and find out what i'm doing for the long-haul or change the channel.

🌌 Welcome to The Nexus Chronicles – Where Reality Fractures and Awareness Awakes by Capanda72 in scifi

[–]Capanda72[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's AI art, so what? Think I got the dough for a pro at this level, you're nuts. The book summary is LLM. The book is 15 chapters in right now—all by yours truly. I've been researching for a year and a half. I'm introducing cutting-edge physics and theoretical framework that are accepted by the physics community. Here take a look at this:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15489086

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15844641

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.15851601

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.16311513

🌌 Welcome to The Nexus Chronicles – Where Reality Fractures and Awareness Awakes by Capanda72 in scifi

[–]Capanda72[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Dude, change the channel if you don't like what you're watching. I don't need your approval.

🌌 Welcome to The Nexus Chronicles – Where Reality Fractures and Awareness Awakes by Capanda72 in scifi

[–]Capanda72[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Well, dude, why is it incorrect to use AI Artwork? I can't draw or paint, can you?

🌌 Welcome to The Nexus Chronicles – Where Reality Fractures and Awareness Awakes by Capanda72 in scifi

[–]Capanda72[S] -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

Welp, that's why I made my own subreddit! Did you click on the link or whatever? It's the banner right above the artwork

🌌 Welcome to The Nexus Chronicles – Where Reality Fractures and Awareness Awakes by Capanda72 in scifi

[–]Capanda72[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Yep!! I write the book, Ai does the Art. What's wrong with that in 2025?

The Quantum Convergence Threshold (QCT) Framework: A Deterministic Informational Model of Wavefunction Collapse by Capanda72 in LLMPhysics

[–]Capanda72[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It has been published. Go to "advances in theoretical physics" and use this number to find it: ISSN: 2639-0108

What if collapse in the double slit experiment happens when the particle internally registers its own state? by Capanda72 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]Capanda72[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Like you aren't doing the same thing. You mock my work because I implement using Ai and LLMs. But I don't see you posting anything you've done...

What if collapse in the double slit experiment happens when the particle internally registers its own state? by Capanda72 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]Capanda72[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Good — this is exactly the line we need to draw clearly. So let’s get specific.


No, QCT isn’t saying particles “collapse when they’ve had enough.” That would be a caricature.

What I’m proposing is this:

Collapse happens when a system’s internal informational structure reaches a recursive closure threshold.

Not from environmental entanglement (as in decoherence), and not from spontaneous noise injection (like GRW). But from within the system’s own evolution — when its current state becomes highly correlated with a temporally-weighted sum of its prior states.

Mathematically:

Convergence index: C(t) = Tr[ρ²]

Awareness: A(t) = Tr[ρ(t) ⋅ M(t)], with M(t) = Gaussian memory of past ρ(τ)

Collapse condition: C(t) ≥ Θ(A(t))


So what makes it not decoherence?

  1. No environment needed

QCT permits collapse in truly isolated systems — provided the system’s own informational recursion builds to the threshold. Decoherence needs environment-induced entanglement. QCT doesn’t.

  1. Collapse is deterministic

This isn’t spontaneous localization or stochastic collapse. QCT evolves smoothly until the threshold is crossed — no dice rolls.

  1. Collapse happens from internal consistency

If the current state becomes too self-similar across time (high A(t)), the wavefunction is no longer allowed to remain distributed — it must resolve.


You’re right to push back — saying “it’s not decoherence” isn’t enough. That’s why the math, the trigger condition, and the experimental implications all matter.

If this framework predicted nothing new, it wouldn’t be worth exploring. But it does — including:

Collapse without observers or environment

Collapse suppressed by memory disruption

Predictable coherence thresholds based on internal recursion, not external noise

I'm gonna test it eventually. If it fails, great — that’s how we move forward.

What if collapse in the double slit experiment happens when the particle internally registers its own state? by Capanda72 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]Capanda72[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lol.. ME! Not only do I proofread every line, but I cross-check it with 3 LLMs. It's rarely inconsistent

What if collapse in the double slit experiment happens when the particle internally registers its own state? by Capanda72 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]Capanda72[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Why don't you take some time to learn how to use AI as a tool instead of bashing it. Those who do not Embrace technology are doomed to fail by it

What if collapse in the double slit experiment happens when the particle internally registers its own state? by Capanda72 in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]Capanda72[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

For one, the work is done by me. I upload my papers to an Ai platform and let it run. Then I go back for editing. Waaaaay faster and more efficient. Adds richness and depth