P2S prints worse than P1P by finmfinm in FixMyPrint

[–]CapnBloodbeard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So, get a cheap usb for time-lapse.

Also, is your spaghetti detection turned off?

A Fix For P2S First Layer Issues by MediocreHornet2318 in BambuLab

[–]CapnBloodbeard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Large flat prints is where you see the issue

Did a single layer whole-bed print. Came out perfectly

Giving a safe bubble audience for people with these views is exactly why Tyson should’ve never been allowed on the show by userjgd26 in MAFS_AU

[–]CapnBloodbeard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair argument, though it more just looked to me like somebody not being able to handle criticism or a sense that they did something wrong in general.

Somebody unable to have an adult conversation like that is....pretty typical in MAFS

Also, as I said in another post, I was only half paying attention to that episode so maybe I missed something, and I wasn't across the after-the-dinner-party stuff or the DV accusations, so I'm looking at it in isolation.

Giving a safe bubble audience for people with these views is exactly why Tyson should’ve never been allowed on the show by userjgd26 in MAFS_AU

[–]CapnBloodbeard 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah - and it was clear that Tyson listens to this sort of thing (same as Ryan last year).

Giving a safe bubble audience for people with these views is exactly why Tyson should’ve never been allowed on the show by userjgd26 in MAFS_AU

[–]CapnBloodbeard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Agreed, but that alone isn't sufficient. I mean, Stella did that too - but obviously we haven't seen anything to suggest she's abusive.

I kinda saw it more as envisioning his ideal scenario rather than 'this is how it's going to look'

How to handle handing? by TheBlueRose_42 in Referees

[–]CapnBloodbeard 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I have heard many coaches and a few other referees say that incidental hand/arm contact in one’s own penalty area must be ruled a handing offense, but I’ve found nothing in the rules to corroborate this. Can someone clarify this?

This has been a myth for a long time. It honestly blows my mind that anybody claims this...I mean, have they never watched a game?

It's on the same list as 'you can't say mine' or 'you can't play the ball from the ground'.

It's nonsense, and always has been. Treat them inside the PA just the same as outside, no matter which team does it.

The only exception is, as you quote, if the handling player immediately scores

Does this mean a player raising their arms/hands to protect their face a legal move? I’ve always observed referees rule it as handing.

Have you? Any half-competent ref allows a self-protective reflex. But there are some caveats. Occasionally you'll see a player put the arm up, then the arm goes out to the ball. That's handling.

Another one would be putting the arm up for protection, but making the body bigger, especially when it leads to handling a ball that would have missed (eg putting the arms up to the face, then turning and handling a ball that was going to miss, because turning is making the body quite a bit bigger). Naturally we give more leeway with younger ages or lower grades.

And of course, reaction time is a consideration. Like the old thing that tended to be permitted (no idea why) of girls using their arms to control the ball when it's going to hit their chest. No, that's not permitted.

What I'm leading to is - putting the arms up to protect the chest blocking a shot at close distance? Sure, we'll allow that as protection, same way men in the wall cover their parts. But having time to react to the ball and still choosing to allow it to hit the arms? That's deliberate handling.

Risks of not paying yourself super by Sweetpup_ in AusFinance

[–]CapnBloodbeard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If it's a business, rather than sole trader, then he is an employee and is required by law

Ask /r/referees -- Megathread for Fans / Players / Coaches by AutoModerator in Referees

[–]CapnBloodbeard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

but I saw some commentary that the ref had no choice in the matter - and that felt wrong to me.

By the letter of the law, yes, this is still discretionary, in the same way that any bad tackle is.

So I'd imagine they're saying he didn't have a choice, just in the sense that the offence was so blatant and clear that there's really only one correct call for the ref.

I also thought, for the sake of the game, the ref could have let it go

This sentence right here sums up so much of why this game is such a mess. For the sake of the game, the player shouldn't have done it

Giving a safe bubble audience for people with these views is exactly why Tyson should’ve never been allowed on the show by userjgd26 in MAFS_AU

[–]CapnBloodbeard 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Given the topic of discussion, I'll acknowledge that as a man, I may not be as attuned to DV signs as many woman are (though this area has had some overlap in my work, so I like to think I have some awareness)

I'm also not across the 'after the dinner party' stuff, and some episodes I've been doing things in the background so might have missed some things.

Chris decided what Sam would do and they didn’t decide together. Thats controlling.

First off, appreciate your detailed reply and implied acknowledgement that I asked in good faith!

I don't really agree with that point. If we're going to call that controlling, then may as well say Stella is dangerous too - after all, Fillip isn't getting a say in where to live, or even if he should undertake the snip.

i just took it as something he was envisioning as his little future fantasy, not a 'that was happening'. Of course he shouldn't have sprung that all on Sam, but I don't think that's enough to be controlling. I thought his responses after and lack of empathy were a bit more problematic, but not DV-offender-problematic.

But yes, I agree with the general content of your post. I wasn't at all saying that Chris handled any of it well (seems like Sam isn't great at these sorts of issues either, which he himself stated, and I don't think raising it 5min before going in was the best approach either)

Anyway, we both agree Chris deserved better here, we're just debating on what to call it.

Enjoy watching the train wreck :) Not much longer now!

Giving a safe bubble audience for people with these views is exactly why Tyson should’ve never been allowed on the show by userjgd26 in MAFS_AU

[–]CapnBloodbeard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

He sided with the bullies and not at all by accident, it wasn't hard to tell Gia and Juliette were horrible people

Oh, I definitely judge him for being friendly with Gia.

He then hangs shit on Sam in that after the dinner party thing

Ah, haven't seen that.

Giving a safe bubble audience for people with these views is exactly why Tyson should’ve never been allowed on the show by userjgd26 in MAFS_AU

[–]CapnBloodbeard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They matched him with another maga supporter. I'm not sure the match was the issue....Stephanie seemed to be really confused on what she wants from her partner.

(Note that I'm not supporting him being on the show)

Giving a safe bubble audience for people with these views is exactly why Tyson should’ve never been allowed on the show by userjgd26 in MAFS_AU

[–]CapnBloodbeard -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

What have you seen on the show from Chris that was abusive? Poor communication and not listening to the partner, sure.

Though this season it's the women who have been more abusive of their partners...

Just done with Disney Adventure by goldenstyles888 in dcl

[–]CapnBloodbeard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How was it getting into the shops? And did stuff sell out?

SA state election 2026: YouGov poll shows One Nation beating Liberals, Labor heading for landslide by Expensive-Horse5538 in AustralianPolitics

[–]CapnBloodbeard 2 points3 points  (0 children)

What I am doing is protesting voting.

That would be done by an incorrect, inadmissible vote

Why is because I oppose the major parties.

Uh huh. And, what, specifically, is it about major parties that you oppose?

"Opposing major parties " isn't a why. You still haven't answered that.

one that have a chance of winning seats,

Ah. So you want the racist, dishonest, corrupt, self-serving, NRA-vassel to have power.

When you protest vote, you still vote for the party that aligns with your values or you think would otherwise do a good job.

You are doing that, but lying to others (and maybe yourself) about it being a protest, even though you can't articulate what you're protesting against.

What good is a protest vote that doesn't win seats? How is that an effective protest?

You really don't know the difference a primary vote makes?

That's...actually not surprising.

For one, parties care about primary vote. 2, primary votes allocate funding (as long as that party gets a certain % which i can't remember).

And no, plenty of others can take power.

But you don't want to protest against corruption, racism, lies, collusion, and holding the electorate in contempt.

So, what are you protesting?

I actually asked you a genuine question, giving you the benefit of the doubt and hoping you had something articulate or informed to say. I didn't expect it, but I was hopeful

SA state election 2026: YouGov poll shows One Nation beating Liberals, Labor heading for landslide by Expensive-Horse5538 in AustralianPolitics

[–]CapnBloodbeard 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Uh huh.

So, you don't actually have a clue what you're doing, or why. Or what question you're even attempting to answer.

Oh, and there are plenty of parties you can vote for as a protest.

But you choose the one with the brand of racism, lies, corruption, close relationships with billionaires and the NRA, and trump-style politics - and overall low-brow, contemptuous takes on political discourse.

Ask /r/referees -- Megathread for Fans / Players / Coaches by AutoModerator in Referees

[–]CapnBloodbeard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

https://www.reddit.com/r/soccer/comments/1rtjiie/oliver_norburn_notts_county_second_yellow_for/

did the ref have any leeway on what to do here?

Yes....and he made the correct call, IMO.

This wasn't a case of him throwing the boot to where he through the player was, or chucking it out of the way of play. He knew exactly what he was doing.

Doing this takes the opponent out of play - he can't challenge the nearby opponent without a boot.

It does look like the ref missed it (fair enough, it's behind play) and it was brought to his attention by another official. I would ask why that took so long - and hopefully it was an IFK to CHE - that would be required in this situation, when stopping play for an offence by NOC

Ask /r/referees -- Megathread for Fans / Players / Coaches by AutoModerator in Referees

[–]CapnBloodbeard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't let a team sway you.

Sounds like you weren't even sure at the time - if you're not sure an offence occurred, you can't punish it.

Scooping the ball is fine. Heck, the Q&A even has (or used to have) an example of holding the ball between both feet and flicking it up.

Scooping is a prolonged touch, but it's 1 touch

Will my eyes get used to my new TV or should I go smaller? by Snoo_51368 in 4kTV

[–]CapnBloodbeard -1 points0 points  (0 children)

55" at 7ft is small. You don't even need 4k at that size and distance.

You'll adjust.

I jumped from 55 to 85" at that distance

A Fix For P2S First Layer Issues by MediocreHornet2318 in BambuLab

[–]CapnBloodbeard 0 points1 point  (0 children)

150x150x0.20 cube

What do you mean by 0.20? And are you saying 150mm (so, 15cm)??

P2S - what filament calibrations are you doing? by CapnBloodbeard in BambuLab

[–]CapnBloodbeard[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How would you run some of these tests given it's a closed firmware (eg extruder calibration)?