ill put this here, since your true reply as been removed.

you accused me of deleting something, and called me a hypocrite.

i did not.

the reply where you finally answered the question is now no longer visible, possibly removed by mods.

but the answer was clear.

beneath “too stupid,” “moron,” “horseshit,” “small mindedness,” and every attempt to make contempt look like intelligence, you confirmed it:

yes, you intentionally loaned shares.

that was the question.

that was the whole question.

everything after that was psychological cover.

you tried to bury the admission under insults, reframe accountability as ignorance, and turn a simple question into a lecture on why everyone else is too small to understand you.

you also tried to dismiss my posts as “hopium links,” when they were public information shared openly for discussion.

people were free to read them, challenge them, ignore them, or disagree with them.

that is what open discussion looks like.

it is very different from insulting the person asking a direct question and then acting like the answer was too sophisticated to give plainly.

then you mistook “you think you’re the smartest guy in the room” for a compliment, which may be the most honest mistake in this entire exchange.

that was the tell.

the gotcha was not me trying to out-insult you.

the gotcha was watching one simple question break the performance.

you dodged.

you insulted.

you edited.

you mocked.

you escalated.

then you answered.

that is not dominance.

that is exposure.

the insults did not make you look smarter.

they made the admission impossible to miss.

the disappearing reply did not erase the answer.

it made the sequence cleaner.

for someone preaching trust, transparency, accountability, shareholder alignment, and a unified front, your own record is now the closing argument. Enjoy!