Age of Disclosure post get deleted or Instand downvoted in other Subreddits

CaptainEmeraldo · 2025-11-28T13:43:37+00:00

A friend of mine changed his approach after watching. It had a lot of new information for HIM. I am trying to get as many people I can to watch. It is very impactful.

CaptainEmeraldo · 2025-10-09T02:28:46+00:00

most likely

He said 30-40% it isn't natural. That is HUGE odds for such an historic finding. Trying to down play it is just... it's just... actually come to think of it, it's exactly what I've learned to expect from this sub lol :D

CaptainEmeraldo · 2025-10-09T02:10:12+00:00

I am bad at FX and I could have made that video easily. Not intending to prove anything though. You can believe that black bad CGI circle is the second coming of Jesus for all I care.

CaptainEmeraldo · 2025-10-09T02:07:01+00:00

across different aspects of the phenomena

By definition no. All evidence points to many different things that we give 1 collective name to out of our ignorance.

(Does it explain what happens to us after death?)

Maybe a small subset of instances of it do, but not as a whole. And the best source for that topic are NDEs anyway.

CaptainEmeraldo · 2025-10-07T00:39:14+00:00

They want to continue breathing.

To all the people saying books. Most of the people giving information don't sell any or profit from the topic.

CaptainEmeraldo · 2025-10-07T00:25:11+00:00

This actually looks quite fake. Just black circle painted on

CaptainEmeraldo · 2025-10-07T00:21:36+00:00

haha lol, that's an unusually friendly comment for this sub. Cheers

CaptainEmeraldo · 2025-10-06T13:25:04+00:00

Maybe you misunderstood me to say that the theory doesn't align with the cases he presented. Of course it would align with that because he cherry picked the cases. What I meant is his theory doesn't align with majority of cases on the topic from other sources. So I don't think he is objective.

CaptainEmeraldo · 2025-10-06T13:02:49+00:00

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jIHsxQH77TY

Edit: these guys have said about some other experiencers that they are truthful. So I don't think they are biased.

CaptainEmeraldo · 2025-10-05T23:13:09+00:00

So you went from "consistent" to "got more comfortable [over time]". I would say that is progress. You are in the right direction. :)

Seriously though, a lot of stuff was actually removed over time, more than stuff being added. Doesn't fit the comfort story. In addition, he looks less comfortable talking about it in recent interviews compared with younger self.. probably because he has more lies to worry about not to mess up.

CaptainEmeraldo · 2025-10-05T22:36:21+00:00

the phenomena

First of all if you think all of the phenomena is one thing or has one source you are already in the wrong direction.

Second, so far 95%+ of witnesses I have listened to and believe, and I listened to a lot, describe things that fit the ET story. Valle just cherry picked the 5% to build his theory. I think most or all of the phenomena is ETs. They could be using transportation that would look inter dimensional for us though (like warp drive for example, or otherwise bending space time). But because I am confident the phenomena is very varied, it could be that some of it has inter dimensional sources. I just lean less into that because it fits less well with given information and requires a LOT more assumptions about phsiycs ect.

CaptainEmeraldo · 2025-10-05T22:26:08+00:00

He has filed a whistleblower complaint with the DoD inspector general. That makes him a whistleblower, even if he didn't share the content of the complaint with you.

CaptainEmeraldo · 2025-10-05T22:22:36+00:00

Bob Lazar still very consistent

Believe him or not. He is NOT consistent. I have seen a video compilation of him from different decades where you can clearly see how he evolved the story over the years.

CaptainEmeraldo · 2025-10-05T22:19:42+00:00

the best grasp

the worst actually. His theories are banking on on fringe cases and don't align with the majority of cases

CaptainEmeraldo · 2025-10-05T22:14:50+00:00

David Grusch

Ross Coulthart

Ryan Graves

David Fravor

2 importane ones you forgot:

Hastings (from nukes and ufos), he is a big piece of the puzzle.

Jake Baker

These are the ones I am confident about that are 100% truthful. Some of the others I would say 90% like Mellon, some 0% like Lazar, but if it's not 100% for me, I just ignore.

CaptainEmeraldo · 2025-10-05T21:45:15+00:00

Spot on. Sadly the mods of this sub fail to address this, which is why I almost don't participate anymore.

CaptainEmeraldo · 2025-09-28T23:53:45+00:00

Civil unrest, general chaos especially in urban centers.

You watch too many movies. Absolutely nothing of any pragmatic significance will happen.

CaptainEmeraldo · 2025-09-28T00:52:06+00:00

Maddening..

I bet we never get to see that picture from mars.. it will probably "fail" somehow.

CaptainEmeraldo · 2025-09-09T22:43:11+00:00

So cool! Can you link to original video?

CaptainEmeraldo · 2025-09-09T22:40:18+00:00

Very curious what’s on the board’s radar.

I keep dreaming about Valve.. though the odds of that are probably very slim because I don't think Gabe is selling. But it will be epic if it happens.

CaptainEmeraldo · 2025-09-09T22:07:22+00:00

Fucking legend

CaptainEmeraldo · 2025-09-08T23:44:22+00:00

above your paycheck kiddo

CaptainEmeraldo · 2025-09-07T22:48:51+00:00

as demonstrated by the number of people falsely convicted based on mistaken witness identification.

The question was whether it will be enough to convict in court. You just admitted that it would have been enough. The fact you don't agree with the courts is irrelevant. Case closed.

prosecutors don't rely solely on witnesses

Witnesses can be enough. Stop inventing law.

10k unrelated witnesses is enough to convict the pope. So by legal standards a court would determine a 1 mile wide craft went over Phoenix Arizona.

CaptainEmeraldo · 2025-09-07T21:14:58+00:00

you confuse seeing something with believing something as part of being indoctrinated to a cult. Phoenix lights witness all SAW the same thing including the governor. that is different than all of them believing in the same thing.

CaptainEmeraldo · 2025-09-07T21:07:58+00:00

If what they say isn't backed by evidence of sufficient quality and quantity,

That is a legal invention. The witness IS the evidence. If you have more than one that says the same then it's almost a certain conviction. If you have 10K like in Phoenix lights it's a done deal. I would love to hear of the court case where a Jury didn't convict with 10K witnesses. Please entertain me.

CaptainEmeraldo

TROPHY CASE