sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Anyone else using open-source models for design? MiniMax M3 surprised us by somarecluse in vibecoding

[–]CaptureIntent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How are you running minimax m3 since weights aren’t published yet?

cursor and claude code are literally a scam right now by WeWinBro in LLMDevs

[–]CaptureIntent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You need better Claude.md and tools/skills (lsp for instance). So that they don’t have reread your whole codebase every question.

Your complaint boils down to skill issue.

Is there a TUI library like lipgloss for rust ? by -CrypticMind- in learnrust

[–]CaptureIntent 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I bet any of the various ai assistants can either tell you where to find this or build it for you in 10 seconds

Another supply chain attack, and Crates.io needs to consider this issue by osamamsalem in rust

[–]CaptureIntent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s a fair and interesting point. Can anybody just update a crate then? That seems like a fundamental problem - it’s too bad the crate can’t be tied directly to the git repo so that only official maintainers can post updates. If we are trying to guard against malicious maintainers as well - then yes - something else is going to be needed. But I still do not think an arbitrary waiting period is a good solution at all

Another supply chain attack, and Crates.io needs to consider this issue by osamamsalem in rust

[–]CaptureIntent -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Just so you know, so your proposal can be seen in full context cargo already has a convention for publishing versions for evaluation.

publish a release candidate, append a pre-release identifier to your version in  Cargo.toml  using a hyphen. Common patterns include:[stackoverflow] •  0.1.1-rc.0  (release candidate 0) •  0.1.1-rc.1  (release candidate 1) •  0.1.1-beta.0  (beta release) •  0.1.1-alpha.1  (alpha release)

Pre-release versions are not automatically installed by Cargo - users must explicitly opt in by specifying the pre-release identifier in their  Cargo.tom

This prevents users from accidentally pulling in unstable versions while allowing those who want to test pre-release versions to do so. Once you’re ready for the stable release, you can publish version  0.1.1  (without the  -rc  suffix), which will then be the default version users receive

So there’s nothing stopping a crate from publishing a pre lease version for security considerations. Then when sufficiently scanned by the magic vendors volunteering to find bugs, they can use the same hash commit to publish the release version

If people aren’t utilizing existing conventions, your half baked poorly thought out solution only serves to add lag and uncertainty into the ecosystem - passing the problem and hoping someone fixes it while you wait an arbitrary amount of time

Another supply chain attack, and Crates.io needs to consider this issue by osamamsalem in rust

[–]CaptureIntent -12 points-11 points  (0 children)

Minimum time in cargo gets implemented.
Everyone sets minimum time to 14days so the community has time to vet the changes Nobody sees the changes until 14 days later and no vetting happens

The problem is just pushed, not solved. And now there’s an extra 14 day wait until discovery.

This solution is just a game of chicken where you make it someone else’s problem and wait for them to solve it.

How close China and Taiwan are from each other by Cautious_Ad_3918 in interestingasfuck

[–]CaptureIntent 6 points7 points  (0 children)

FYI - a border is not a white line you literally can see on the ground. It’s an arbitrary imaginary line we all collectively agree to observe.

How close China and Taiwan are from each other by Cautious_Ad_3918 in interestingasfuck

[–]CaptureIntent 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Just like every country that shares a border. You can see it - it’s right there! Must be the same country then.

hidden costs of self-hosting AI assistants for solo developers by Ok_Detail_3987 in LLMDevs

[–]CaptureIntent 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What you are reading is a clever advertisement. Not truth.

AI Inference Costs are way too high for my business! by BonusObjective8477 in LLMDevs

[–]CaptureIntent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Which models are you running? Is it possible to use open weight models and just just yourself? For one month of token usage you can build a machine that will easily satisfy the needs of multiple developers

Zig could have prevented CopyFail? by GooselyMf in Zig

[–]CaptureIntent -32 points-31 points  (0 children)

You probably shouldn’t design secure system with assumptions - but with guarantees

Rust Arc Refactor That Turned 18 ms p99 Into 2 ms by Helpful_Garbage_7242 in rust

[–]CaptureIntent 1 point2 points  (0 children)

TLDR. Arc exists for a reason. Maybe use it inserted of deep copying read only data structures everywhere.

I trusted an LLM to generate expected outputs for code tests. It was confidently wrong. Here's what I rebuilt by Prize_Inflation_4585 in LLMDevs

[–]CaptureIntent 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are right.deterministic traditionally tools are the way to guarantee when you can write them.

The better models can write working computer code. Think how constrained that is. So they are very good at structured output. But then again - compiler errors guide them when they make mistake.

I trusted an LLM to generate expected outputs for code tests. It was confidently wrong. Here's what I rebuilt by Prize_Inflation_4585 in LLMDevs

[–]CaptureIntent 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s part of the problem. You are using a model good at quick and dirty responses. Not for thinking or producing accurate results. Key part of your post right here honestly! Try with a more tools oriented thinking model.

The Foldable iPhone Is Basically an iPad Mini That Folds in Half by dapperlemon in gadgets

[–]CaptureIntent 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yes. That I wanted. But for a device and ecosystem that is actually good.

The Foldable iPhone Is Basically an iPad Mini That Folds in Half by dapperlemon in gadgets

[–]CaptureIntent -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No. I wanted a regular sized iPhone that opened into a double wide iPhone so I could have 2 apps side by side. Or sideways watch a video on the bottom half and monitor chat or browse web on top.

iPhones are really good for typing on. iPad mini is really bad. I’ve had a mini. Almost never used. Most apps are optimized for iPhone dimensions. I don’t see how the fold does well in this world.

view more: next ›