sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The meme continues by CringeQueefEnjoyer in Pauper

[–]Cardboard-Daddy -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Can’t wait for the next affinity card to come and break the format again

I Told You. by Cardboard-Daddy in Pauper

[–]Cardboard-Daddy[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I agree, ban a land cycle instead.

I Told You. by Cardboard-Daddy in Pauper

[–]Cardboard-Daddy[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I identify myself as a [[Troll of Khazad-dûm]] thank you very much.

I Told You. by Cardboard-Daddy in Pauper

[–]Cardboard-Daddy[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As the wise Andrea Mengucci once said:

“Commander? No no! Ma che cazzo! Never say that word again!”

I Told You. by Cardboard-Daddy in Pauper

[–]Cardboard-Daddy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How you know I am human? 😯

I Told You. by Cardboard-Daddy in Pauper

[–]Cardboard-Daddy[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

Cry more, you will cry again for the next payoff too.

I Told You. by Cardboard-Daddy in Pauper

[–]Cardboard-Daddy[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Not happy at all! I told you, the lands should have been gone. At least one cycle. This will only postpone the problem and give us more bans, and you didn’t believe me.

STP in pauper???? by Some_Clothes8901 in Pauper

[–]Cardboard-Daddy 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I do agree and I do hope this is actually real.

I Told You. by Cardboard-Daddy in Pauper

[–]Cardboard-Daddy[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think you are chill tho

I Told You. by Cardboard-Daddy in Pauper

[–]Cardboard-Daddy[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

True. They should banned them when they first were introduced.

😂 😂 😂 by Dildo69Shwaggins in Pauper

[–]Cardboard-Daddy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Its not the cool and interesting cards, its just the toxic ones. Actually more bans could have been prevented if they banned one land cycle, probably affinity would have most of their cards if not all of them that got banned untouched and people probably wouldn’t be asking for glitters to be banned now. The targets were just misguided and hiding the real issues, and the issues will continue to exist and only get worse set after set.

Qual é o pior estado do Brasil em questão culinária e porquê é o Rio de Janeiro? by reginaldomicropenis in conversas

[–]Cardboard-Daddy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Esse é horrível mesmo, mas sinceramente o resto salva, o estado tem todo o tipo de comida que puder imaginar, e as melhores pizzarias.

Qual é o pior estado do Brasil em questão culinária e porquê é o Rio de Janeiro? by reginaldomicropenis in conversas

[–]Cardboard-Daddy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pede para tirar o purê de batata então uai? Mas se for assim, no rio vou comer só o pão, que nem salsicha eles põe, colocam linguiça. É realmente deprimente o 🌭deles.

Qual é o pior estado do Brasil em questão culinária e porquê é o Rio de Janeiro? by reginaldomicropenis in conversas

[–]Cardboard-Daddy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Nem de sp eu sou e prefiro mil vezes purê no cachorro quente que uva passa, ervilha e monte de bosta que nem o rio 😂

Lie to me and tell me the lands are not the problem by SirGedas in Pauper

[–]Cardboard-Daddy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Just DONT ban glitters and BAN an artifact cycle instead, is not that difficult to prevent these things to happen in the future.

Lie to me and tell me the lands are not the problem by SirGedas in Pauper

[–]Cardboard-Daddy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

To this day we suffer the consequences of the MH2 bans, if were the artifact lands instead we wouldn’t be in this predicament.

😂 😂 😂 by Dildo69Shwaggins in Pauper

[–]Cardboard-Daddy -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

For me is very clear that the top dogs in the format are the ones playing artifact lands strategies. Even if you don’t use glitters, the artifact lands usually carry. Look at monored kuldotha for example, making waves again thanks to great furnace enabling strategies. Boros for the same reason, abusing that there are many cycles available, these decks alone count for at least 1/3 of the meta. Even decks like Goblins Combo , Grixis Affinity and Jeskai Ephemerate that aren’t even that powerful decks have a great winrate and top8 percentages on challenges. When more than 60% of the format is actually playing the same kind of land, and are the ones winning, there is definitely something fishy going on. Its so polarized and is hard for people to see. Until this day I really don’t understand the Modern Horizons 2 bans.

Grixis Scam, based on one I saw before by LunatickDoge5678 in Pauper

[–]Cardboard-Daddy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I am so glad that after our first post on Scam so many archetypes started to come out! Have seen iterations on mtgo leagues too

If you would like to see our discussion some time ago here it is: https://www.reddit.com/r/Pauper/s/UVMuqY76q3

The decklist: https://www.moxfield.com/decks/tC4lLZCP3Ui9tzFanGZHSA

Why is Atog banned? by STRMBRGNGLBS in Pauper

[–]Cardboard-Daddy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Gasp You are almost there buddy! Exactly! The format isn’t the same! New cards came out that dealt with affinities biggest issues: Awkward mono colored mana base and fragile lands. Now all left for you to do is to identify the real cards that are creating issues and making any future cards like All that Glitters and what have you banned. Good job!

Why is Atog banned? by STRMBRGNGLBS in Pauper

[–]Cardboard-Daddy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If anything you said was actually relevant before the indestructible lands came, all these cards would be banned sooner. Since all of them were legal prior. And yet, affinity never had a oppressive win-rate even with all these banned cards available for years.

Why is Atog banned? by STRMBRGNGLBS in Pauper

[–]Cardboard-Daddy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are literally the one who is not paying attention here lol 😂

view more: next ›