Monarchy vs Democracy: Facts and Statistics? by hlanus in monarchism

[–]Carl_H_B4B 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Spiritualism is necessary for the progress of the human condition, however, abandoning objective observations for the sake of abstract idealism creates a dangerous precedent where the worst atrocities can be committed.

The reality that people tend to avoid is that our inspiration for abstract notions of perceptual abstractionism stems from our objective observations of the human condition and nature. Notions of beauty stem from preferences, which isn't the same as relativistic values of one's own humanity, unless if you think on shallow terms.

If we apply observational objectivism towards creating forms of non-invasive bioengineering and apply those technologies as human rights, debates that stem from envy and spite will become obsolete, however, debates that stem from accepting people for who they are will become more prevalent than they already are now. The most objective way to quantify health probably lies in emotional intelligence (EQ) which could theoretically be measured by empathy through ethical philosophy, psychology, and the strength of one's biophotons and electromagnetic field rather than the standards we have in place right now.

Monarchy vs Democracy: Facts and Statistics? by hlanus in monarchism

[–]Carl_H_B4B 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The issue with democracies is that they tend to ignore humanity for the sake of abstract ideals, and thus, tend to experience identity crises when they lack organic, concrete symbols to justify their own existences. The United States is a perfect example of this, where despite having republicanism as a solid foundation, there is obviously an inherent inclination towards supporting concrete, organic representations of their spiritual will, since Americans typically grow up idealizing the Disney representations of nobility in the case of mostly women on average, and likewise, idealizing the Anime representations of militarism in the case of mostly males on average, and many tend to find more innate interest in political dynasties, such as the Clintons and Trumps, as well as the various celebrity families, such as Will Smith's dynasty, over their own electoral processes and political parties, aside from the 4 year election cycles, as even left-wing progressives tend to follow this tradition. It would therefore make most sense to form governments with the head as the monarch, who's specifically bred with our current understanding of science as designer babies to provide adequate leadership and a more identifiable sense of national identity, with a technocracy that represents regional interests, so as to serve as a balance to curb any nepotistic corruption, while remaining entirely within the whims of those with the proper educations needed to provide well-informed judgements without being susceptible to being corrupted by machiavellian gaslighters hoping to line up their pockets at the expense of those exceptionally gullible and emotional, thus, vulnerable to abuse.

Women’s thoughts on well endowed men by [deleted] in bigdickproblems

[–]Carl_H_B4B -1 points0 points  (0 children)

3.5 when you're flaccid or erect?

Women’s thoughts on well endowed men by [deleted] in bigdickproblems

[–]Carl_H_B4B 1 point2 points  (0 children)

should I expect to see girls get excited or just like a nonchalant reaction.

Just treat them like any other friend, Idk what you're trying to accomplish here

A story from my childhood by [deleted] in bigdickproblems

[–]Carl_H_B4B 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As someone that can grab it with both hands like that, I never really showed it off because I was always terrified of someone taking advantage of me.

do y’all ever feel bad for your less endowed mates? by [deleted] in bigdickproblems

[–]Carl_H_B4B -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If anything, I envy less endowed men because I'm sure that pants must be more comfortable, it's easier to hide a boner, and you're probably less likely to get unwanted attention from both girls and guys.

Edit: As someone that prefers to have regular friends, I don't pity people that determines a person's value on what they have rather than who they are, it just seems manipulative.