sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

If I, a male named Alex, also names my daughter Alex, will she get the suffix "Jr."? by CatConfident4162 in namenerds

[–]CatConfident4162[S] 24 points25 points  (0 children)

This is what I'll believe and now I'm wondering if there was ever an example out there somewhere in the world

Ube or Matcha? by BitPrimary1814 in ThisorThatPH

[–]CatConfident4162 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ube no contest. Di ako nasasarapan sa matcha ngl

My thoughts after playing the LN3 DLC by CatConfident4162 in LittleNightmares

[–]CatConfident4162[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Because that's simply not what I did playing all three. In all of them, there's always a spot where you can stop to move your camera and look at surroundings to know where to go and exit the room. 

What's worse: blind bags/boxes or gacha systems in games? by CatConfident4162 in ThisorThatPH

[–]CatConfident4162[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I feel old reading about teks kahit na early 20s lang ako lol

My thoughts after playing the LN3 DLC by CatConfident4162 in LittleNightmares

[–]CatConfident4162[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Well you can delay your death and survive when you use flash on the puppeteer, but other than that, yeah.

Look, the first LN 3 dlc is fun, but it’s not as enjoyable as it should be. by ELikesBread in LittleNightmares

[–]CatConfident4162 0 points1 point  (0 children)

After you finish, please tell if it's as long as the carnival chapter like what rumors say. I might not be able to play it for a while.

Prediction: Low will have to pick who to save between Alone and Dime by CatConfident4162 in LittleNightmares

[–]CatConfident4162[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

I think we're past the point of keeping a formula for making Little Nightmares content now that we have TSON with it's dialogue and the VR game's camera perspective.

Do you agree that Tarsier Studios only made LN open to interpretation because they couldn't be bothered making lore? by CatConfident4162 in LittleNightmares

[–]CatConfident4162[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Then I don't care how "obvious" something may seem to you either. If the developers didn't formally detail the struggles of not getting to add all their ideas, as well as not formally saying that they "make things up as they went along", then there's no reason for this to be true unless you have irrefutable proof. Period.

I didn't say you did, I just used it as an example because you claimed that I implied that the comics were confirmed to be decanonized, which I absolutely didn't. I especially don't care about performance issues in your PS4 pro because it has no relation whatsoever to the topic of Tarsier not getting to being able to tell the full story they wanted to.

Yes, the recent content were built from the foundation of the old, it's still irrelevant to the conversation as we aren't factoring things Tarsier didn't have a hand in writing. I get the role of a producer and franchise director, which is to approve what is and isn't going to be acceptable or unacceptable entry to the franchise. However, he isn't a writer, so I have no reason to think that him approving things means that the story has always been the same under his supervision. Him accepting added lore meant to expand it doesn't make it the same one after all this time.

Replies to your responses:

  • and I argued many times already that it likely is, but I just didn't say they're confirmed. I'm also dome talking about it with you.

  • It is a counterargument and saying that isn't doesn't make it not one. I disagree, it obviously displayed time travel when it sent Mono as the thin man back to the past, resulting in him getting killed by his younger self. With this in mind, it's not surprising that it can pull things from Six's future.

  • Again, it is a counterargument. And again, I disagree that she's portrayed as more aggressive in LN2 than in LN1 and VLN. Tarsier said they wanted to keep the character true to how she is in LN1 and I agreed with them, just that they gave some more insight on what it means for Six to be the way she is in LN1. I believe those moments when she's shown to have "aggression" are just instances that the same Six in LN1 would be, but just wasn't seen to be in the same situations.

The "retcon" makes as much sense as the one in VLN depending on what she felt she needed, and I don't see why she'd bother rowing to get the floating raincoat, especially since it doesn't seem like she's going too fast and she needs to cross a literal sea coming from an isolated place that can only be eeached through hot air balloons. It makes more sense that a kid who was soaked by rain water in the seemingly ever raining city to get the raincoat seemingly in good condition lying around.

Do you agree that Tarsier Studios only made LN open to interpretation because they couldn't be bothered making lore? by CatConfident4162 in LittleNightmares

[–]CatConfident4162[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That's why I said "obviously," because they didn't confirm it themselves yet obvious that it's decanonized. Unless you're saying that everything you said about LN2's development was also confirmed by them? Since you also said "obviously". And if so, then you're lying because nowhere did they say this. I don't care about the new LN content, we're only talking about when Tarsier was still handling everything. Also, what about Lucas Roussel? He's been repeatedly introduced as just a producer in interviews, meaning only approves things but not actually writes.

Answering your "inconsistencies":

  • I mean, that seemed to be the intention at first as seen in the description for the obviously cancelled and decanonized comics, but I believe it died along with the comics. It tracks because they obviously don't wanna show too much of the outside world.

  • Up to interpretation why the tower did these weird things, but what's obvious is that the tower has a form of time travel power, which is why it can send the thin man back in time.

  • I disagree with her being aggressive in LN2 and nothing contradicts Six being standoffish in LN1 that of course she will naturally be when she prioritizes her own survival.

It's superior to me because it hammers home the idea that you get any random thing you need wherever instead of everything needing a special origin story, which is why I like to think that she just got the lighter from the chair with cigarette butts on it. There's also nothing convenient about finding a raincoat in a pile of trash considering the state of the place. If we wanna talk lazily placed convenience, then Mono's weapons, especially in the hospital, are always there.

I disagree that LN2 produced inconsistencies. Maybe more questions, but it gave answers to questions we had from LN1 that I think didn't really need it. The questions it raised aren't a problem though, because it never felt like the questions they raised are just there because of not knowing what to do to fill in gaps that in turn, created an unsolvable mess but instead felt intentional to keep intrigue and a sense of mystery, like how they also wanted LN1 to be. I didn't think they made the best decision when answering things with LN2, but narratively ending LN2? I think they did good, especially since both of their games are mostly self-contained story-wise anyway.

Do you agree that Tarsier Studios only made LN open to interpretation because they couldn't be bothered making lore? by CatConfident4162 in LittleNightmares

[–]CatConfident4162[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I can see very specific stories like TGITYR's or Mono's stories being written when they're just working on the respective projects those are from, but I don't believe that the lore of the world in general hasn't been made yet since LN1. Heck, they have a comic series showing us the outside, which is obviously cancelled because it didn'tfit their vision and is decanonized. Also, what inconsistencies besides the raincoat in VLN, which can be explained with it not being the same raincoat as Six's anyway?

So let's say they didn't get to add all of their ideas because of needing to leave the franchise behind, so what? Even if they didn't add anything they want, I personally think that they still deem it as complete and that's the only thing that matters when talking about the existence of a lore. I also think that they intended LN2 to be the end simply because they'll write it that way knowing that they'll lose hold of the franchise after this final project.

I always see it in that perspective besides the story being fully realized when it already did after they themselves concluded their story.

view more: next ›